Oppo Find X3 Neo vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 19, 2021 April 11, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 92.74 cm³ 101.21 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.56 "/g 3.31 "/g
Weight 184 g 201.8 g
Height 159.9 mm 164.2 mm
Width 72.5 mm 76.1 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Galactic Silver
  • Starlight Black
  • Polar White
  • Graphite Gray
  • Star Blue
  • Ice blue

Display

Screen Size 6.55 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.3 % 86 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 700 nits
Peak Brightness 1100 nits 1100 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.89 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.52 mAh/cm³ 49.4 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G (8 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver)
GPU Adreno 650 Adreno 618

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 11
Maximum OS Version 12

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoXiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions159.9 × 72.5 × 8 mm164.2 × 76.1 × 8.1 mmXiaomi is taller & wider, slightly less pocketable; Oppo feels more compact.
Weight184g201.8gOppo is noticeably lighter, better for comfortable one-handed use.
Display
Size6.55"6.67"Xiaomi offers slightly more screen real estate for media consumption.
Resolution1080x24001080x2400Both provide sharp visuals with similar clarity.
Pixel Density402 PPI395 PPIVery similar sharpness, negligible difference in daily use.
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors, deep blacks, and good contrast.
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzXiaomi has smoother scrolling and animation transitions.
Brightness1100 nits1200 nitsXiaomi is slightly better for outdoor visibility in bright sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+)Snapdragon 732G (8 nm)Oppo offers significantly faster processing, smoother multitasking & better gaming.
AnTuTu Score743,500397,200Oppo is much faster for demanding apps and heavy gaming.
GPUAdreno 650Adreno 618Oppo provides much better graphics performance, especially for gaming.
Battery
Capacity4500mAh5020mAhXiaomi has a larger battery, likely providing longer battery life.
Charging65W67WBoth provide fast charging with very similar speeds.
FeaturesReverse chargingReverse chargingBoth can charge other devices.
Camera
Rear Main Camera50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56", Sony IMX766108MP, f/1.9, 1/1.52", Samsung S5KHM2Xiaomi captures more detail, Oppo excels in low light with larger sensor and wider aperture
Front Camera32MP, f/2.4, 1/2.74", Sony IMX61516MP, f/2.45, 1/3.13", Sony IMX471Oppo has higher resolution selfies.
Telephoto Lens13MP, f/2.4N/AOppo offers optical zoom for better quality zoomed shots.
Wide Angle Lens16MP, f/2.28MP, f/2.2Oppo captures more detailed wide-angle shots.
Portrait LensN/A2MP, f/2.4Xiaomi has a dedicated depth sensor for better bokeh effect
Macro Lens2MP, f/2.45MP, f/2.4Xiaomi takes slightly higher resolution macro shots
VideoUp to 4K 60fps with HDR, EISUp to 4K 30fpsOppo offers more advanced video capabilities.
DXOMark Score106N/AOppo has a tested and better rated camera setup
Software
OSAndroid 11, upgradable to 12Android 11, no information on upgradesOppo might have a more up-to-date OS, but only one extra update.
Connectivity
WiFiWiFi 6, MiMOWi-Fi 5Oppo has faster and more stable WiFi connection.
Bluetooth5.1 with AptX, LDAC, SBC, AAC5.1 with A2DP, EDR, HIDOppo offers better audio codecs for higher quality wireless audio.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoOppo has slightly more precise location tracking.
Storage
Internal128/256 GB128/256 GBBoth have the same storage options
RAM12 GB6/8 GBOppo enables much smoother multitasking and app handling.
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone supports additional storage.
Audio
QualityHi-Res Audio, Stereo SpeakersHi-Res Audio, Stereo SpeakersBoth offer good audio quality.
Security
FeaturesBasic fingerprint sensorSide-mounted fingerprint sensorXiaomi offers a more convenient and modern fingerprint sensor location
Build Quality
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5Corning Gorilla Glass 5Both devices have the same screen protection.
Sensors
SensorsFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, GyroscopeFingerprint, Ultrasonic proximity virtual, Accelerometer, Compass, GyroscopeBoth have all the essential sensors for general daily usage.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Find X3 Neo Advantages:

  • Significantly Superior Performance: Snapdragon 865 chipset offers much faster processing and better gaming capabilities compared to the Snapdragon 732G in the Xiaomi. This leads to smoother app usage and better gaming.
  • Better Camera System: Although Xiaomi has higher megapixel count for main and macro cameras, the Oppo has higher quality sensors, a telephoto lens, optical image stabilization, and better video recording features overall leading to more versatile and higher-quality photos and videos. Oppo is also the only tested one.
  • Faster and More Stable WiFi: With WiFi 6 and MiMO, the Oppo has a more robust connection ideal for modern networks.
  • Better Bluetooth Audio: Supports higher quality audio codecs like AptX and LDAC for superior wireless audio quality.
  • More RAM: 12GB of RAM is better for multitasking and smoother performance.
  • More Precise Location Tracking: Supports more satellite systems for better location accuracy.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G Advantages:

  • Larger Battery: 5020mAh battery offers more battery life than the Oppo's 4500 mAh, ideal for users with heavy usage.
  • Slightly Larger Display: The 6.67" display offers slightly more screen real estate.
  • Higher Refresh Rate: The 120Hz refresh rate offers smoother animations and scrolling.
  • Side-Mounted Fingerprint Sensor: More convenient access.
  • Lower Price: The Xiaomi is usually priced lower.
  • Dedicated Depth Sensor: For more accurate portrait shots

Significant Trade-offs:

  • The Oppo sacrifices battery capacity for a lighter and more powerful device.
  • The Xiaomi compromises on performance and camera quality for a longer battery life and a lower price point.
  • Oppo lacks a dedicated depth sensor.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Ideal User for Oppo Find X3 Neo:

  • Power Users/Gamers: Individuals who prioritize high performance, fast app loading times, and a smoother experience.
  • Photography Enthusiasts: Users who want a versatile camera system with high-quality photo and video capabilities.
  • Tech-Savvy Users: Those who appreciate advanced features such as Wi-Fi 6, Hi-Res audio and better bluetooth codecs
  • Users who require fast performance: For work and content creation.

Specific Use Cases for Oppo Find X3 Neo:

  • High-end gaming with demanding graphics
  • Video editing and content creation on the go
  • Capturing high-quality photos and videos in diverse scenarios.
  • Multitasking between demanding applications with ease
  • Users who use headphones often.

Ideal User for Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G:

  • Budget-Conscious Users: Individuals who want a feature-rich device at a more affordable price point.
  • Casual Users: People who prioritize battery life over high-end performance.
  • Media Consumers: Users who enjoy watching videos and movies on their phone.
  • Users who want a comfortable fingerprint sensor: Prefers a side-mounted fingerprint sensor.
  • Users who want more portrait-focused photography: A depth sensor for better background blur.

Specific Use Cases for Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G:

  • Streaming movies and videos for extended periods.
  • General social media browsing and communication.
  • Casual mobile gaming
  • Everyday photography
  • Users who need a phone to last a full day without recharging.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions to Consider:

  1. What is your budget? The Xiaomi is likely more affordable.
  2. Do you prioritize performance or battery life? Oppo excels in performance; Xiaomi in battery endurance.
  3. How important is camera quality to you? Oppo has a more versatile and higher-quality camera setup.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • If you are a heavy gamer or need a high-performance phone: The Oppo Find X3 Neo is the clear choice.
  • If you prioritize battery life and value: The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G is a good choice.
  • If you want the best camera quality within the options: The Oppo is the better option.
  • If you need a better portrait photography: The Xiaomi is the only option that features a dedicated depth sensor.

My Choice

If I were choosing between these two phones, I would personally pick the Oppo Find X3 Neo. Despite the slightly smaller battery, the significantly superior processing power, better camera system, and faster WiFi make it the better overall device for my needs. I value smooth performance, versatile photography, and good quality wireless audio, and the Oppo delivers on all those fronts. While the Xiaomi offers a bigger battery, its performance lags behind, and the camera differences are too big to ignore for my photography needs. I also value a more comprehensive WiFi experience. Ultimately, for me, the Oppo offers a more premium and powerful experience, even with the trade-off in battery size, and a higher price point, which I would be willing to pay.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.