Oppo Find X3 Neo vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 19, 2021 December 1, 2021
Release Year 2021 2021

Physical

Volume 92.74 cm³ 108.86 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.56 "/g 3.59 "/g
Weight 184 g 181 g
Height 159.9 mm 162 mm
Width 72.5 mm 75.5 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Galactic Silver
  • Starlight Black
  • Carbon Gray
  • Pebble White
  • Sea Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.55 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.3 % 83.4 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 405 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1100 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.89 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.52 mAh/cm³ 45.93 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 650 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 11
Maximum OS Version 12

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Oppo Find X3 Neo vs. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoXiaomi Redmi Note 11 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions159.9 × 72.5 × 8 mm162 × 75.5 × 8.9 mmXiaomi is slightly larger, might be less comfortable for single-handed use. Oppo is more compact.
Weight184g181gNegligible difference in weight.
Display
Size6.55"6.5"Almost identical display size; negligible difference for most users.
Resolution1080x24001080x2400Same level of sharpness.
PPI402405Virtually indistinguishable sharpness.
TechnologyAMOLEDUnknownOppo has better contrast, deeper blacks, and potentially better power efficiency with dark themes. The Xiaomi's display technology is not specified.
Refresh Rate90Hz90HzBoth are equally smooth in scrolling and animations.
Brightness1100 nits0 nitsOppo offers significantly better outdoor visibility under bright sunlight. The Xiaomi's brightness is not specified so it's impossible to say how it compares.
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+)Mediatek Helio G88 (12 nm)Oppo has much faster processing, app loading, and gaming performance. Xiaomi is slower and less suitable for intensive tasks.
AnTuTu Score743,500253,100Oppo is significantly more powerful; suitable for heavy multitasking and gaming.
GPUAdreno 650Mali-G52 MC2Oppo has a more powerful GPU, translating to better gaming and graphic-intensive app performance.
Camera
Standard50MP f/1.8, 1/1.56" Sony IMX76650MP f/1.8, Sensor Model: UnknownSimilar resolution; Oppo has a larger sensor size for potentially better low-light performance and the exact model is known. Xiaomi's sensor details are missing.
Selfie32MP f/2.4, 1/2.74" Sony IMX6158MP f/2.0, Sensor Model: UnknownOppo offers higher resolution selfies. Xiaomi has a wider aperture for better low-light selfies, but without sensor information, a full comparison is not possible.
Telephoto13MP f/2.4, 1/3.4" Samsung S5K3M5NoneOppo has a telephoto lens for optical zoom capabilities; a major advantage.
Wide Angle16MP f/2.2, Sensor Model: Unknown8MP f/2.2, Sensor Model: UnknownOppo has higher resolution for wide-angle shots; a likely improvement in detail.
Macro2MP f/2.4, 1/5" GalaxyCore GC02M12MP f/2.4, Sensor Model: UnknownBoth have similar macro lenses; basic macro capabilities.
VideoUp to 4K@60fps with HDR, EIS1080p@30fpsOppo can record higher quality videos; great for vlogging or capturing important memories. Xiaomi has limited video recording capabilities.
DXOMarkOverall: 106, Photo: 104, Video: 106Not testedOppo's camera is objectively better based on DXOMark scores (though this is a single data point); Xiaomi has no publicly available scores.
FeaturesOIS, PDAF, etc., Quadruple CameraTriple Camera, RAWOppo has optical zoom and stabilization, enhancing photo and video quality, and more camera lens flexibility. Xiaomi has a RAW capture mode.
Battery
Capacity4500mAh5000mAhXiaomi has a larger battery for potentially longer battery life.
Charging65W fast charging18W fast chargingOppo charges much faster, allowing you to quickly top up your phone battery.
FeaturesReverse chargingReverse charging, 9W reverse wired chargingBoth support reverse charging; Xiaomi can charge other devices via a wired connection, though at a slow speed.
Software
OSAndroid 11, upgradable to 12Android 11, Max Version: UnknownOppo has confirmed OS upgrades; Xiaomi's future OS support is uncertain.
Connectivity
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), MIMO802.11acOppo provides faster and more efficient Wi-Fi speeds in compatible networks; Xiaomi is less capable in crowded networks.
Bluetooth5.1 LE, LDAC, SBC, AAC5.1 LEOppo supports higher quality audio codecs for wireless headphones, like LDAC and SBC and AAC, resulting in richer sound quality.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoOppo offers better GPS accuracy via more satellite systems.
Storage
Internal128GB or 256 GB128 GBOppo offers an option for double the internal storage; more space for apps, photos, and videos.
RAM12 GB4 GB or 6 GBOppo has significantly more RAM for much better multitasking.
ExpandableNoNoNeither device offers expandable storage; a potential limitation for power users.
Audio
QualityHi-Res Audio, Stereo SpeakersStereo SpeakersOppo offers better sound quality via Hi-Res Audio certification and its stereo speakers; better suited for audiophiles.
Security
FeaturesBasic Fingerprint SensorSide-mounted fingerprint sensorXiaomi features a potentially more convenient and faster side-mounted sensor.
Build Quality
Screen ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5Corning Gorilla Glass 3Oppo is less susceptible to scratches and accidental damage.
Sensors
FeaturesProximity, Accelerometer, Compass, GyroscopeUltrasonic Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, GyroscopeBoth have basic sensors; Oppo adds Proximity and more (Pedometer and gravity); Xiaomi has ultrasonic Proximity.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Find X3 Neo Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 865 chipset offers much better CPU and GPU performance, leading to smoother app loading, multitasking, and gaming.
  • Better Display: AMOLED display provides vibrant colors, deep blacks, and excellent outdoor visibility thanks to the higher brightness.
  • Enhanced Camera System: Offers a versatile quad-camera setup with a dedicated telephoto lens, higher-resolution selfie and wide-angle cameras and 4K video recording.
  • Faster Charging: 65W fast charging significantly reduces charging times.
  • Better Audio: Includes Hi-Res Audio and superior Bluetooth codec support, resulting in higher quality sound.
  • More RAM: 12GB of RAM provides better multitasking capabilities.
  • Faster Wifi: With the inclusion of Wifi 6, it is much faster than the Xiaomi.
  • Better GPS: With the inclusion of QZSS, the device is more accurate.
  • Better Build Quality: With Gorilla Glass 5, the device offers greater protection from scratches and accidents.
  • More Sensors: Includes the gravity sensor, and Pedometer.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G Advantages:

  • Larger Battery: 5000mAh provides slightly better battery life.
  • Wired Reverse Charging: Can charge other devices via wired connection, though at 9W.
  • Side-mounted Fingerprint Sensor: More convenient and faster for some users
  • Raw Photo Capture: Provides more control for photography enthusiasts.

Significant Trade-offs:

  • Oppo: Lacks a larger battery and is more expensive than the Redmi Note 11.
  • Xiaomi: Significantly inferior performance, lower-quality display and camera system, slower charging, and uncertain future OS updates.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Find X3 Neo:

  • Ideal User: Gamers, heavy multitaskers, photography enthusiasts, users who value premium features and performance, those who want a high-quality screen and fast charging.
  • Use Cases:
    • Mobile Gaming: Smooth gameplay on demanding titles, thanks to its powerful processor and GPU.
    • Photography & Videography: High-quality photos and 4K videos with diverse shooting options and features like OIS.
    • Content Consumption: Enjoying HDR content and high-fidelity audio with the vibrant display and Hi-Res Audio.
    • Heavy Multitasking: Seamlessly switching between multiple apps with 12GB of RAM.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G:

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users, individuals seeking a phone with a larger battery, and those with basic smartphone usage requirements.
  • Use Cases:
    • Basic Daily Use: Web browsing, social media, messaging, and calls, with a focus on battery life.
    • Budget Photography: Capturing everyday photos and videos.
    • Users needing a phone that can function as a power bank via wired reverse charging.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Budget: How much are you willing to spend on a new smartphone?
  2. Primary Use Cases: What tasks do you perform most frequently on your phone (e.g., gaming, photography, browsing, etc.)?
  3. Performance vs. Battery: Do you prioritize raw power or battery life, or do you want both?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: High Performance & Camera Are Critical - If you prioritize gaming, photography, and smooth multitasking, the Oppo Find X3 Neo is the clear choice despite the higher price. Its processing power, superior camera system, faster charging and high quality display are a must.
  • Scenario 2: Budget is the Primary Concern - If your budget is tight, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G is an adequate option for basic use, providing a large battery, but this comes at the expense of a much lower-performing device and a less capable camera setup.
  • Scenario 3: Need a good balance of features but prioritize battery - The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G may be the option in this scenario, with its slightly bigger battery. However, it is necessary to accept the trade off in other departments.

My Choice

I would choose the Oppo Find X3 Neo. The substantial performance difference between the two phones is a major factor. As someone who uses a phone for a variety of tasks, including some mobile gaming, video editing, and photography, the Oppo's Snapdragon 865 chipset, high-quality display, and advanced camera system offer a much smoother and more enjoyable experience. While the Redmi Note 11 4G has a larger battery, the 65W fast charging on the Oppo makes up for it. The higher quality audio and superior connectivity features are also appealing. Though it is more expensive, the Oppo Find X3 Neo justifies the investment with significantly better performance, a superior display, and a much more capable camera system, making it a far more versatile device for a range of use cases.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.