Oppo Find X3 Neo vs Xiaomi Redmi 13 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 19, 2021 June 3, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 92.74 cm³ 106.77 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.56 "/g 3.31 "/g
Weight 184 g 205 g
Height 159.9 mm 168.6 mm
Width 72.5 mm 76.3 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Galactic Silver
  • Starlight Black
  • Midnight Black
  • Pink
  • Ocean Blue
  • Sandy Gold

Display

Screen Size 6.55 " 6.79 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2460
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.3 % 85.1 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 550 nits
Peak Brightness 1100 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.89 mAh/in² 109.10 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.52 mAh/cm³ 47.11 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5030 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) Mediatek Helio G91 Ultra (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 650 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 12

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Here's a detailed comparison of the Oppo Find X3 Neo and Xiaomi Redmi 13:

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoXiaomi Redmi 13Practical Impact
Design
Launch Date2021-03-192024-06-03Xiaomi is significantly newer, potentially longer software support
Size159.9 x 72.5 x 8 mm168.6 x 76.3 x 8.3 mmOppo is more compact and pocketable
Weight184g205gOppo feels lighter and more comfortable for extended use
Display
Size6.55"6.79"Xiaomi offers slightly larger screen for immersive viewing
Resolution1080x24001080x2460Both offer similar sharpness, no major difference
Pixel Density402 PPI396 PPIMinimal difference in sharpness; visually indistinguishable
TechnologyAMOLEDIPS LCDOppo has superior contrast, colors and deeper blacks
Refresh Rate90Hz90HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations
Brightness1100 nits0 nitsOppo offers significantly better outdoor visibility in bright sunlight
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+)MediaTek Helio G91 Ultra (12 nm)Oppo has a much more powerful processor for demanding tasks and gaming
AnTuTu Score743,500269,266Oppo offers far superior overall performance and speed
GPUAdreno 650Mali-G52 MC2Oppo provides better graphics for gaming and video editing
Camera
Main Camera50MP (f/1.8, 1/1.56", Sony IMX766)108MP (f/1.8)Xiaomi has higher resolution, but Oppo has a larger sensor and a more advanced sensor model
Selfie Camera32MP (f/2.4, 1/2.74", Sony IMX615)13MPOppo has higher resolution front camera
Telephoto Lens13MP (f/2.4, 1/3.4", Samsung S5K3M5)NoneOppo has optical zoom capability for better close-ups
Wide Angle Lens16MP (f/2.2)NoneOppo has a wide angle camera for group photos and landscapes
Portrait LensNone2MP (f/2.4)Xiaomi has dedicated portrait depth camera for bokeh effect
Macro Lens2MP (f/2.4, 1/5", GalaxyCore GC02M1)NoneOppo can capture close-up details
Video Recording4K@60fps, HDR, EIS1080p@30fpsOppo has higher-resolution and more advanced video capabilities
DxOMark Score106 (Main)Not testedOppo's camera performance is objectively rated higher
Battery
Capacity4500mAh5030mAhXiaomi has a larger battery for longer usage
Charging65W Fast Charging33W Fast ChargingOppo charges significantly faster
Software
OSAndroid 11 (upgradable to 12)Android 14Xiaomi has the latest Android version with newer features and potential updates
Connectivity
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)Oppo has faster Wi-Fi for quicker downloads and online gaming
Bluetooth5.1 LE5.3 LEXiaomi has a newer Bluetooth version for better connectivity and power management
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoOppo offers more accurate location tracking
Storage
Internal128 GB or 256 GB128 GB or 256 GBBoth provide same internal storage options
RAM12 GB6 GB or 8 GBOppo has more RAM for smoother multitasking
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither support memory expansion
Audio
QualityHi-Res Audio, Stereo SpeakersBasic audio featuresOppo provides superior sound quality with stereo speakers
Security
Fingerprint SensorBasicSide-mountedXiaomi has more convenient fingerprint sensor location
Build Quality
Screen ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5UnknownOppo has stronger screen protection against scratches and drops

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Find X3 Neo Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 865 chipset provides significantly higher processing power, making it faster for gaming, multitasking, and demanding apps.
  • Better Display: The AMOLED screen offers better contrast, color accuracy, and deeper blacks, plus much higher brightness for better outdoor use.
  • Advanced Camera System: Offers a versatile camera setup with a telephoto lens, wide-angle lens, and superior video recording capabilities (4K at 60fps), higher-resolution front camera, and a proven camera quality with dxoMark.
  • Faster Charging: 65W charging allows for quicker battery top-ups.
  • Better Audio: Offers a higher quality audio experience with hi-res audio and stereo speakers.
  • Stronger Build: Features Corning Gorilla Glass 5 for better screen protection.
  • More RAM: 12GB of RAM ensures smooth multitasking even with demanding applications.

Practical Implications for Oppo Find X3 Neo:

*  Better for users who need a phone for gaming or media consumption
*  Significantly better for those that want a capable camera
*  Great for users who value quality audio.
*  Faster charging allows users to top up their phone quickly.

Xiaomi Redmi 13 Advantages:

  • Newer Software: Android 14 provides the latest features and security updates.
  • Larger Battery: 5030mAh battery provides longer usage between charges.
  • More Convenient Fingerprint Sensor: A side-mounted fingerprint sensor offers more intuitive access.

Practical Implications for Xiaomi Redmi 13:

*  Newer software offers long-term support and better features
*  Ideal for users who prioritize long battery life

Trade-offs:

  • Oppo: Older Android version and significantly higher cost, although its better performance and camera might make this worth it.
  • Xiaomi: Significantly weaker performance and camera performance.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Find X3 Neo Ideal User:

  • Power User: Those who need fast performance for gaming, video editing, and heavy multitasking.
  • Photography Enthusiasts: Users who value image quality, versatile camera options, and superior video recording capabilities.
  • Multimedia Consumers: Users who value higher quality audio and want the best possible audio experience on a smartphone
  • Users who value display quality: Prefer AMOLED's superior blacks, contrast, and color.
  • Professionals: Those who need reliable performance and a good camera for work.

Oppo Find X3 Neo Use Cases:

  • Mobile gaming at high settings
  • High-quality content creation (photos and videos)
  • Demanding work tasks
  • Enjoying high-quality media with great audio
  • Outdoor use in bright sunlight.

Xiaomi Redmi 13 Ideal User:

  • Budget-Conscious Users: Those looking for a phone with good value at a lower price point.
  • Casual Users: Those who primarily use a phone for communication, social media, and basic apps.
  • Users who value long battery life: Users who do not like charging their phones often
  • Users who need up to date Android: Users that want the latest security patches.

Xiaomi Redmi 13 Use Cases:

  • Everyday communication and social media.
  • Basic web browsing.
  • Light gaming.
  • Long periods between charging.
  • Users who want a modern Android experience on a budget.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is performance and speed to you? (Gaming, app loading, multitasking).
  2. How much do you prioritize camera quality? (Photo quality, video recording).
  3. How important is battery life vs fast charging? (Do you prefer longer use, or faster charging?).

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Power User/Gamer: If you need maximum performance, a high-quality display and camera, the Oppo Find X3 Neo is a significantly better choice.
  • Scenario 2: Budget-Conscious Buyer: If you need an affordable phone with a long battery life, the Xiaomi Redmi 13 is a more suitable option, though with significant sacrifices to speed, display quality, and camera performance.
  • Scenario 3: Casual User: If your priority is an up to date Android version and decent battery life the Xiaomi is a better option, although you will sacrifice on other aspects.

My Choice

I would choose the Oppo Find X3 Neo.

While the Xiaomi Redmi 13 is newer and has a larger battery and a side-mounted fingerprint sensor, these benefits are overshadowed by the significant performance, display, camera, and audio advantages of the Oppo Find X3 Neo. The Oppo Find X3 Neo offers a superior user experience in critical areas such as performance, photography, and multimedia consumption, making it worth the extra investment. For my personal needs, which includes mobile gaming, demanding applications, and quality photography, the Find X3 Neo's capabilities better suit those needs, and I am willing to compromise on having a slightly older Android version. The significantly superior display on the Oppo would make it more enjoyable to use, especially outdoors. Also, the much faster charging on the Oppo makes the smaller battery capacity less of an issue, as I can quickly charge it during the day. The overall superior performance is a huge deciding factor as well.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.