Oppo Find X3 Neo vs Xiaomi Poco X4 GT - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 19, 2021 June 27, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 92.74 cm³ 108.18 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.56 "/g 3.3 "/g
Weight 184 g 200 g
Height 159.9 mm 163.6 mm
Width 72.5 mm 74.3 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Galactic Silver
  • Starlight Black
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.55 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2460
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.3 % 85.1 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 407 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 144 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 650 nits
Peak Brightness 1100 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.89 mAh/in² 116.62 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.52 mAh/cm³ 46.96 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5080 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 650 Mali-G610 MC6

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 12

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Design

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoXiaomi Poco X4 GTPractical Impact
Dimensions159.9 x 72.5 x 8 mm163.6 x 74.3 x 8.9 mmThe Poco X4 GT is noticeably larger and thicker, potentially feeling less comfortable in hand.
Weight184g200gThe Oppo is significantly lighter, making it more comfortable to hold for extended periods.
Build(No data given)(No data given)Without details, a build quality comparison isn't possible.

Display

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoXiaomi Poco X4 GTPractical Impact
Size6.55"6.6"Negligible difference; both offer ample screen real estate.
Resolution1080x24001080x2460Both are sharp; slight difference is practically unnoticeable.
PPI402407Both have good pixel density for sharp images.
TechnologyAMOLEDIPS LCDOppo offers superior blacks, contrast, and potentially more vibrant colors, better for media consumption.
Refresh Rate90Hz144HzPoco has significantly smoother scrolling and animations, better for gaming and fast-paced content.
Brightness1100 nits0 nitsOppo is much better for outdoor visibility under direct sunlight due to higher peak brightness.

Performance

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoXiaomi Poco X4 GTPractical Impact
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 865 5G (7nm+)Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5nm)Poco's chipset is newer and more efficient, leading to better sustained performance in demanding tasks.
AnTuTu Score743,500820,061Poco has a better raw performance, translating to better experience in gaming and heavy app usage.
GPUAdreno 650Mali-G610 MC6Poco has a more modern GPU that is suitable for high end gaming.

Camera

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoXiaomi Poco X4 GTPractical Impact
Main Camera50MP f/1.8, 1/1.56" IMX76664MP f/1.89, 1/1.72" S5KGW1Oppo has a larger sensor, potentially better low-light performance; Poco has higher resolution.
Selfie Camera32MP f/2.4, 1/2.74" IMX61516MP f/2.45, 1/3.06" OV16A10Oppo has higher resolution, larger sensor, potentially better quality selfies.
Telephoto Lens13MP f/2.4Not AvailableOppo has a dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom, allowing for better zoomed pictures.
Wide Angle Lens16MP f/2.28MP f/2.2Oppo has higher resolution wide angle lens, resulting in more detailed wide angle photos .
Macro Lens2MP f/2.4 1/5"2MP f/2.4 1/5"Comparable macro lenses with same resolution and sensor size.
Video4K@60fps HDR, EIS4K@30fpsOppo can shoot HDR at 60fps for better video recording and uses EIS for stabilization, but Poco records 4k at 30fps.
DxoMarkMain: 106, Photo: 104, Video: 106Not AvailableOppo's camera scored decently, suggesting good image quality; Poco is not tested by DxoMark.
Camera FeaturesOIS, Optical Zoom, Quad camera, CDAFUltra stable video, triple camera, Manual focus, RAWOppo has better hardware features like OIS and optical zoom, Poco has RAW and "Ultra stable video" feature .

Battery

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoXiaomi Poco X4 GTPractical Impact
Capacity4500mAh5080mAhPoco likely offers longer battery life due to larger capacity.
Charging65W Fast Charging67W Fast ChargingSimilar charging speeds, both allow quick top-ups, Poco is negligibly faster.
FeaturesReverse ChargingNo Specific FeaturesOppo can act as a power bank, useful in some situations.

Software & Other

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoXiaomi Poco X4 GTPractical Impact
OSAndroid 11 (Upgradable to 12)Android 12Poco has a newer version of Android out of the box; Oppo needs an update to get the same version.
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6Both support the latest Wi-Fi standards for fast wireless connections.
Bluetooth5.15.3Poco has the latest Bluetooth version, potentially offering better efficiency, stability, and new features.
GPSMultipleMultipleBoth have good support for location services.
RAM12GB8GBOppo has significantly more RAM, better for heavy multitasking and app switching.
Storage128/256GB128/256GBBoth offer the same storage options; sufficient for most users, but there is no expandable storage option for either of them.
Audio QualityHi-Res, Stereo SpeakersHi-Res, Stereo Speakers, Dolby AtmosPoco has additional audio enhancements, for a richer audio experience.
SecurityBasic in screen FingerprintSide Mounted FingerprintPoco provides faster and more intuitive fingerprint sensor, and has a better location on the device.
Build QualityGorilla Glass 5 ScreenGorilla Glass 5 ScreenBoth use similar protection for the screen; they are equally durable against scratches and drops.
SensorsMultipleMultipleBoth have comprehensive sensor suites, but the Oppo additionally has proximity, gravity and pedometer sensors while the Poco has RGB and ultrasonic proximity sensors.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Find X3 Neo Advantages

  • Superior Display: AMOLED screen with 1100 nits brightness offers better contrast, colors, and outdoor visibility.
  • Better Camera Hardware: Larger main camera sensor, dedicated telephoto lens, OIS, and high-resolution selfie camera enhance photo versatility.
  • More RAM: 12GB RAM is better for heavy multitasking.
  • Reverse Charging: can act as a power bank.
  • More comprehensive sensor set: Provides a more advanced sensor set.
  • Video recording: Higher frame rate video recording

Xiaomi Poco X4 GT Advantages

  • Smoother Display: 144Hz refresh rate for a more fluid visual experience, especially for gaming.
  • Higher Performance: Newer and more efficient chipset offers better performance and sustained workload capabilities.
  • Larger Battery: Offers potentially longer battery life.
  • Newer Bluetooth: Bluetooth 5.3 for potentially improved connectivity.
  • Better Audio Features: Dolby Atmos and Dual microphones enhance the audio experience.
  • Faster Side Mounted Fingerprint Scanner
  • Newer OS: Latest Android version out of the box, with guaranteed update support.

Trade-offs

  • Oppo: Loses on raw performance and display fluidity compared to the Poco, is slightly older and has a smaller battery.
  • Poco: Sacrifices camera versatility and screen quality for performance and fluidity.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Ideal Users for Oppo Find X3 Neo

  • Photography Enthusiasts: Users who prioritize camera quality and versatility, enjoy capturing photos in various scenarios, including zoom capabilities.
  • Media Consumers: People who frequently watch videos or enjoy vibrant colors and high-contrast displays.
  • Heavy Multitaskers: Those who run multiple apps simultaneously and need ample RAM.
  • Users who prioritize lighter devices
  • Users who want the ability to reverse charge other devices

Specific Use Cases:

  • Capturing detailed photos in various lighting situations.
  • Enjoying high-quality video content and detailed pictures.
  • Quickly switching between multiple apps without lag.

Ideal Users for Xiaomi Poco X4 GT

  • Gamers: Users who value high refresh rates and top-tier performance for smooth gameplay.
  • Power Users: Those who need a long-lasting battery and excellent processing power.
  • Audio Enthusiasts: People who value great audio quality with Dolby Atmos.
  • Users who prefer newer operating systems
  • Users who prioritize speed

Specific Use Cases:

  • Playing demanding mobile games with smooth, responsive gameplay.
  • Long days away from a charger without needing to worry about battery life.
  • Immersive audio experiences while watching videos or gaming.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What do you value more - camera capabilities or gaming performance?
    • If you prioritize photography and display quality, the Oppo is better. If you prioritize gaming and overall performance, the Poco is better.
  2. Is battery life or screen quality more critical?
    • The Poco has a larger battery, while the Oppo has a brighter AMOLED screen.
  3. How important is the latest version of Android and fastest fingerprint sensor?
    • The Poco has a newer OS and a side-mounted fingerprint sensor while the Oppo has an in screen sensor.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Casual User - If you use a smartphone for social media, browsing, and light gaming, both phones will suffice. But if a user wants a better screen quality the Oppo is better; or if the user prioritizes performance, then the Poco is better.
  • Scenario 2: Travel Photographer - The Oppo's versatile camera system and brighter screen make it more suitable for travel photography.
  • Scenario 3: Hardcore Gamer - The Poco's high refresh rate display and powerful chipset make it the better option for serious gaming.

Personal Choice

If I had to choose, I would lean towards the Xiaomi Poco X4 GT. While I appreciate the Oppo's excellent display and camera versatility, the Poco's combination of a smoother 144Hz screen, better chipset for more demanding games, a bigger battery for longer gaming sessions and better audio features, are more in line with my primary needs. While the camera might not be as versatile as the Oppo’s, it is still very capable, while providing features like RAW shooting. The difference in performance and display fluidity would make a much bigger impact on my daily experience, along with the improved fingerprint sensor for quicker unlocking, and Dolby Atmos for a richer audio experience.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.