Smartphone Comparison: Oppo Find X3 Neo vs. Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Oppo Find X3 Neo | Xiaomi Poco F4 GT | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 159.9 × 72.5 × 8 mm, 184g | 162.5 × 76.7 × 8.5 mm, 210g | The Find X3 Neo is more compact and significantly lighter, making it more comfortable for one-handed use and prolonged holding. The F4 GT is larger and heavier. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.55" | 6.67" | The F4 GT has a slightly larger screen, potentially offering a more immersive experience for media consumption, although the difference is marginal. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | Both offer the same sharpness of the display, making the display quality similar on both phones. |
| Pixel Density | 402 PPI | 395 PPI | Both have similar pixel density, ensuring a sharp display. The negligible difference won't be noticeable in practical use. |
| Technology | AMOLED | AMOLED | Both offer vibrant colors, deep blacks, and excellent contrast. |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 120Hz | The F4 GT provides smoother scrolling and animations, enhancing the overall visual experience, especially for gaming and fast-paced content. |
| Brightness | 1100 nits | 0 nits | The Find X3 Neo is much brighter, making it significantly more usable in direct sunlight. This specification for the Poco F4 GT is missing, but assumed to be lower, likely closer to 500-600 nits given typical AMOLED performance. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Snapdragon 865 (7 nm+) | Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | The F4 GT has a much newer and more powerful chipset, leading to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance. |
| AnTuTu Score | 743,500 | 1,178,365 | The F4 GT significantly outperforms the Find X3 Neo in benchmarks, indicating a substantial difference in processing power and overall speed. |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 730 | The Adreno 730 in the F4 GT provides superior graphics performance, crucial for graphically demanding games and applications. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 4500mAh | 4700mAh | The F4 GT has a slightly larger battery, potentially providing slightly longer battery life, but the difference is not substantial. |
| Charging | 65W Fast Charging, Li-Polymer | 120W Fast Charging, Li-Ion | The F4 GT charges much faster, enabling significantly quicker battery top-ups. |
| Features | Reverse charging, Non-removable | Non-removable | The Find X3 Neo can charge other devices wirelessly, while both feature non-removable batteries. |
| Camera | |||
| Main Camera | 50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56", Sony IMX766 | 64MP, f/1.73, 1/1.7", Sony IMX686 | The Find X3 Neo has a larger sensor for better low-light performance, while the F4 GT has a higher resolution sensor. |
| Selfie Camera | 32MP, f/2.4, 1/2.74", Sony IMX615 | 20MP, f/2.4, 1/2", Sony IMX596 | The Find X3 Neo has higher resolution on its selfie camera, while the F4 GT has a slightly larger sensor. |
| Telephoto Lens | 13MP, f/2.4 | None | The Find X3 Neo offers a dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom, a feature missing on the F4 GT. |
| Wide Angle Lens | 16MP, f/2.2 | 8MP, f/2.2, 1/4" | The Find X3 Neo has a higher resolution wide angle lens which allows for capturing more detail in wide angle photography. |
| Macro Lens | 2MP, f/2.4 | 2MP, f/2.4 | Both have a basic macro lens, providing comparable quality. |
| Video Recording | Up to 4K@60fps with HDR, EIS | Up to 4K@60fps with HDR | Both offer similar video capabilities. Find X3 Neo also offers 1080p at 60fps, which can be useful for creating smooth videos. F4 GT offers more slow motion capabilities and options up to 720p@960fps |
| DXOMark (Mobile) | 106 | Not tested | The Find X3 Neo camera scored 106 in DXOMark tests, with separate scores for photo and video at 104 and 106. The F4 GT lacks these results. |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11, Max 12 | Android 12, Max 13 | The F4 GT ships with a newer OS and a higher version upgrade, offering the latest features and security updates. |
| Connectivity | |||
| WiFi | WiFi 6 | WiFi 6 | Both support the latest WiFi standards. |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 | The F4 GT has a slightly newer Bluetooth version for potentially better connectivity. |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo | A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BeiDou (B1), Galileo (E1+E5a), BeiDou (B2) | The F4 GT has a more accurate GPS, offering a more accurate location. |
| SIM | Dual Nano SIM | Dual Nano SIM | Both support dual SIMs. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal | 128GB/256GB | 128GB/256GB | Both offer the same storage options. |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB/12GB | Both offer 12GB variants, though the F4 GT also provides a lower spec 8GB model. |
| Expandable | No | No | Neither supports expandable storage. |
| Audio | |||
| Quality | Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers | Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers, 3 microphones | The F4 GT has a more immersive audio experience through Dolby Atmos and 3 microphones for better recording quality. |
| Security | |||
| Features | Basic fingerprint sensor | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor | The F4 GT has more modern side mounted fingerprint sensor, whereas the Find X3 Neo has a basic sensor. |
| Build Quality | |||
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | The F4 GT has superior screen protection using Gorilla Glass Victus, providing better scratch and drop resistance. |
| Sensors | Biometric, Proximity, Motion | Biometric, Motion, Ultrasonic proximity virtual | Both have standard sensors, though the F4 GT has an Ultrasonic proximity sensor and additional RGB sensor, while the Find X3 Neo has a standard proximity sensor and features Pedometer and Gravity sensor. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Oppo Find X3 Neo Advantages
- Lighter and more compact: Easier to handle and carry, better for one-handed use.
- Brighter Display: Significantly better visibility in direct sunlight.
- Telephoto Lens: Offers optical zoom capabilities, which the F4 GT lacks.
- Reverse Charging: Can charge other devices wirelessly.
- Better wide angle camera Higher resolution and better image quality
- More flexible video recording options: Offers 1080p at 60 fps which can be very useful for specific use cases.
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Advantages
- More Powerful Processor: Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 offers substantially better performance.
- Higher Refresh Rate: 120Hz provides smoother animations and gaming.
- Faster Charging: 120W charging significantly reduces charging times.
- Newer OS: Ships with Android 12 and has a higher update version available.
- Improved audio: Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers with 3 microphones for better audio quality, sound immersion, and voice recording.
- Superior Screen Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass Victus provides better durability.
- More accurate GPS More accurate location.
- Better fingerprint sensor: more modern side-mounted fingerprint sensor
- More Advanced sensors: Has more modern sensors.
- More slow motion recording options: Has more recording options and higher framerate available.
Trade-offs
- The Find X3 Neo prioritizes a more premium build, with a brighter screen and useful features like reverse charging. However, it sacrifices raw performance and charging speeds.
- The Poco F4 GT prioritizes performance, fast charging, and an immersive media experience. However, it has a heavier design and lacks a telephoto camera and reverse charging. It also has a lower screen brightness and less flexible video recording options.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Oppo Find X3 Neo
- Ideal Users: Users who value a comfortable, premium design, a bright display, and good all-around camera performance. Suitable for general users who take photos and videos, and want a phone that is easy to handle.
- Use Cases:
- Outdoor photography in bright conditions.
- Daily use for social media and content consumption.
- Users who appreciate a lightweight phone.
- Occasional use of the optical zoom.
- Users who want the ability to reverse charge.
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
- Ideal Users: Gamers, performance enthusiasts, and those who prioritize the latest hardware and fast charging.
- Use Cases:
- Mobile gaming with high graphics settings.
- Heavy multitasking and demanding applications.
- Users who value fast charging.
- Streaming content with immersive audio.
- Users who prefer the latest software version.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions to Consider
- How important is raw performance for you? If you're a gamer or power user, the F4 GT is much better. If you're a casual user, the Find X3 Neo is likely sufficient.
- Do you often use your phone outdoors? The significantly brighter display of the Find X3 Neo might be crucial for outdoor visibility.
- Is a telephoto lens important for you? If you use optical zoom often, the Find X3 Neo is better. The F4 GT doesn't have one.
- How important is charging time? If you value quick charging, the 120W charging of the F4 GT makes a big difference.
Scenario-Based Recommendations
- Scenario 1: Casual user, focuses on comfort and camera: Choose the Oppo Find X3 Neo for its lighter weight, brighter display, and versatile camera setup with telephoto capabilities.
- Scenario 2: Gaming and performance enthusiast: The Xiaomi Poco F4 GT is the clear choice due to its more powerful processor, higher refresh rate, and faster charging.
- Scenario 3: High brightness: Choose the Oppo Find X3 Neo for its higher screen brightness.
- Scenario 4: Battery charging time is very important: Choose the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT due to its much faster 120W charging.
My Choice and Explanation
If I were choosing between these two phones, I would personally pick the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT. My reasoning is as follows:
While the Oppo Find X3 Neo has some compelling advantages like a lighter design and a telephoto lens, the performance difference between the two phones is too large to ignore. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 in the Poco F4 GT is significantly more powerful and provides a much smoother experience, especially when it comes to gaming and multitasking, and is a better "future-proof" choice. This is crucial for ensuring longevity and fluid performance. Additionally, the 120W fast charging is very appealing to me as it drastically cuts down on the charging time. I would be able to charge my phone in about 20 minutes, and for me that is important as I would often leave my house without having my phone at full charge.
I also value the enhanced audio experience the F4 GT provides with Dolby Atmos, along with the updated security from a side mounted fingerprint sensor, and improved durability due to the Gorilla Glass Victus screen. The slightly heavier design is a compromise that I am willing to make to gain the performance, fast charging, and other advantages the F4 GT offers, and I think that the differences are substantial enough to make it the better choice for me.
Ultimately, it comes down to priorities, but in my case, the faster charging, better performance and newer features outweigh the advantages of the Find X3 Neo.
