Oppo Find X3 Neo vs Xiaomi Poco F3 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 19, 2021 March 27, 2021
Release Year 2021 2021

Physical

Volume 92.74 cm³ 97.55 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.56 "/g 3.4 "/g
Weight 184 g 196 g
Height 159.9 mm 163.7 mm
Width 72.5 mm 76.4 mm
Thickness 8 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Galactic Silver
  • Starlight Black
  • Arctic White
  • Night Black
  • Deep Ocean Blue
  • Moonlight Silver

Display

Screen Size 6.55 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.3 % 85.9 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1100 nits 1300 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.89 mAh/in² 101.60 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.52 mAh/cm³ 46.33 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 4520 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585)
GPU Adreno 650 Adreno 650

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 11
Maximum OS Version 12 13

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Design

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoXiaomi Poco F3Practical Impact
Physical Size159.9 × 72.5 × 8 mm163.7 × 76.4 × 7.8 mmPoco F3 is taller and wider, potentially less comfortable for one-handed use; Oppo Find X3 Neo is slightly thicker but may feel more compact overall.
Weight184g196gOppo Find X3 Neo is lighter, making it more comfortable for longer usage.

Display

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoXiaomi Poco F3Practical Impact
Size6.55"6.67"Poco F3 offers a slightly larger viewing area, better for media consumption.
Resolution1080x24001080x2400Identical sharpness; Both screens will appear equally crisp.
PPI402395Negligible difference, both are very sharp.
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth have vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzPoco F3 has smoother scrolling and animations, enhancing the user experience.
Brightness1100 nits1300 nitsPoco F3 is more visible in bright sunlight due to higher peak brightness.

Performance

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoXiaomi Poco F3Practical Impact
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+)Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm)Poco F3 has a slightly newer and faster chipset, translating to better overall performance and faster app loading times.
Antutu Score743,500800,216Poco F3 scores slightly higher in benchmarks, indicating a more powerful device for demanding tasks.
GPUAdreno 650Adreno 650Identical graphics performance, both devices will handle games similarly.

Camera

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoXiaomi Poco F3Practical Impact
Main Camera50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56", Sony IMX76648MP, f/1.79, 1/2", Sony IMX582Oppo Find X3 Neo has a larger sensor for potentially better low-light performance and slightly better detail.
Selfie Camera32MP, f/2.4, 1/2.74", Sony IMX61520MP, f/2.45, 1/3.4", Samsung S5K3T2Oppo Find X3 Neo has higher resolution and larger sensor for better quality selfies, especially in low light.
Telephoto Lens13MP, f/2.4Not AvailableOppo Find X3 Neo has a dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom capabilities.
Wide Angle Lens16MP, f/2.2Not AvailableOppo Find X3 Neo has a dedicated wide-angle lens for capturing landscape and group photos.
Macro Lens2MP, f/2.4Not AvailableOppo Find X3 Neo has a dedicated macro lens for taking close-up photos.
Video Recording4K@60fps with HDR, EIS, 1080p@480fps slow-mo4K@30fps with EIS, 1080p@960fps slow-moOppo Find X3 Neo can shoot 4K at 60fps with HDR and offers 480fps slow motion, while Xiaomi Poco F3 is limited to 4K at 30fps and 960fps slow motion. Both phones offer video stabilization technologies: Oppo Find X3 Neo uses Yes while Xiaomi Poco F3 uses No
DxOMark ScoreMain: 106 (Photo 104, Video 106)Not AvailableOppo Find X3 Neo’s camera performance is rated with DxOMark, Xiaomi Poco F3 is not.

Battery

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoXiaomi Poco F3Practical Impact
Capacity4500mAh4520mAhBoth phones have similar battery capacities, suggesting similar battery life.
Charging65W Fast Charging33W Fast ChargingOppo Find X3 Neo charges much faster, reducing downtime.
FeaturesReverse ChargingQC3+/PD3.0Oppo Find X3 Neo can act as a power bank, charging other devices; Xiaomi Poco F3 has standard fast charging protocols.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Find X3 Neo Advantages

  • Superior Camera System: Features a more versatile quad-camera setup with a higher-resolution main sensor, telephoto, wide-angle and macro lenses, providing better image quality and zoom capabilities compared to Poco F3. It has a higher selfie resolution and larger sensor for low light conditions.
  • Faster Charging: 65W fast charging significantly reduces charging time compared to Poco F3's 33W.
  • Reverse Charging: Allows the phone to charge other devices, adding convenience.
  • Better Video: Supports 4K 60fps with HDR and EIS.

Xiaomi Poco F3 Advantages

  • Smoother Display: 120Hz refresh rate provides a smoother visual experience than the 90Hz display of the Oppo Find X3 Neo.
  • Slightly Better Performance: The Snapdragon 870 chipset offers a minor edge in benchmarks and slightly better real-world performance compared to the 865 in the Oppo.
  • Brighter Screen: The 1300 nits brightness means better outdoor visibility compared to Oppo’s 1100 nits screen.
  • More Advanced GPS: Enhanced satellite support for better location accuracy.
  • More OS Updates: Xiaomi Poco F3 is confirmed to receive updates to Android 13.

Significant Trade-offs

  • Oppo Find X3 Neo: Loses out on higher refresh rate display and slightly slower chipset, but gains significantly in camera versatility and charging speed.
  • Xiaomi Poco F3: Compromises on camera quality and versatile lens options in favor of a smoother display and slightly more performance power.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Find X3 Neo - Ideal Users

  • Photography Enthusiasts: Users who prioritize camera quality and versatility, needing different focal lengths and optical zoom capabilities.
  • Users who value Quick Charging: Individuals needing fast charging times to minimize downtime.
  • Content Creators: Those needing better video quality, 4K at 60fps, telephoto lens, and wide-angle capabilities for content creation.

Xiaomi Poco F3 - Ideal Users

  • Gamers: Users who prioritize smooth gameplay with the higher refresh rate display, and who desire a slightly more powerful processor.
  • Media Consumers: Users who watch a lot of videos and prefer a brighter, larger display.
  • Value Seekers: Users looking for a device with flagship-level performance at a more competitive price point.

Specific Use Cases

  • Oppo Find X3 Neo:
    • Traveling: Capture high-quality landscape photos with wide-angle lens, detailed close-ups using the macro lens, and distant scenes with telephoto.
    • Content creation on the go: Shoot high-quality videos with OIS.
    • Daily photography for social media: Versatile camera setup will suit most user needs.
  • Xiaomi Poco F3:
    • Mobile gaming: Enjoy smoother gameplay with the 120Hz refresh rate and slightly faster processor.
    • Watching movies and TV shows: Enjoy the larger and brighter screen.
    • General daily usage with good performance: The faster processor ensures smooth performance, with better outdoor visibility.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions

  1. Do you prioritize camera versatility and quality over display smoothness? (If yes, Oppo Find X3 Neo; if no, Xiaomi Poco F3)
  2. Is fast charging a must-have feature for you? (If yes, Oppo Find X3 Neo; if not, either)
  3. Do you prefer a smoother display and gaming experience over advanced camera features? (If yes, Xiaomi Poco F3; if not, Oppo Find X3 Neo)

Scenario-Based Recommendations

  • Scenario 1: The Frequent Traveler/Content Creator: If you travel a lot and capture lots of photos and videos, the Oppo Find X3 Neo is a better choice due to its superior camera versatility, telephoto, wide-angle and macro lens, higher resolution selfie camera, video recording, and fast charging.
  • Scenario 2: The Mobile Gamer/Media Enthusiast: If gaming and media consumption are your main priorities, the Xiaomi Poco F3 will be more suitable due to the smoother 120Hz display, slightly better processor, and brighter screen.
  • Scenario 3: The Budget Conscious User: If price to value is important the Xiaomi Poco F3 offers great performance at a lower price point.

My Choice

If I were to choose between these two phones, I would pick the Oppo Find X3 Neo.

Here's why:

  1. Camera Versatility: As a user who values photography, the telephoto, wide-angle, and macro lens in the Oppo Find X3 Neo make it more appealing. Having all these lens options opens more possibilities, and the higher resolution and larger sensors give an advantage in terms of low-light performance.
  2. Video Quality: The ability to record at 4K 60fps with HDR is a significant benefit.
  3. Fast Charging: The 65W charging is a huge convenience, especially for users who are always on the go.
  4. Performance: While the Snapdragon 870 in the Poco F3 is marginally faster on paper, the real-world difference is unlikely to be significant for my needs.
  5. Practicality: Having a more versatile camera, faster charging, and reverse charging features simply outweigh the 120Hz display and slightly better performance of the Xiaomi Poco F3.

While the Xiaomi Poco F3 offers better value and a smoother display experience, the camera versatility and much faster charging of the Oppo Find X3 Neo suit my personal preferences and use cases.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.