Oppo Find X3 Neo vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 19, 2021 April 16, 2021
Release Year 2021 2021

Physical

Volume 92.74 cm³ 82.62 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.56 "/g 4.17 "/g
Weight 184 g 157 g
Height 159.9 mm 160.5 mm
Width 72.5 mm 75.7 mm
Thickness 8 mm 6.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Galactic Silver
  • Starlight Black
  • Boba Black (Vinyl Black)
  • Peach Pink (Tuscany Coral)
  • Bubblegum Blue (Jazz Blue)

Display

Screen Size 6.55 " 6.55 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.3 % 85.3 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 402 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1100 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.89 mAh/in² 99.06 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.52 mAh/cm³ 51.44 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 4250 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G (8 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver)
GPU Adreno 650 Adreno 618

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 11
Maximum OS Version 12

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Oppo Find X3 Neo vs. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite

1. Specifications Comparison

Design

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoXiaomi Mi 11 LitePractical Impact
Dimensions159.9 x 72.5 x 8 mm160.5 x 75.7 x 6.8 mmMi 11 Lite is slightly taller and wider but significantly thinner, offering a more slender feel. The Find X3 Neo has a larger overall volume.
Weight184g157gMi 11 Lite is noticeably lighter, making it more comfortable for prolonged use and single-handed operation.

Display

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoXiaomi Mi 11 LitePractical Impact
Size6.55"6.55"Both offer the same screen real estate, suitable for media consumption and multitasking.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2400Both provide a sharp and detailed viewing experience with identical pixel densities.
Pixel Density402 PPI402 PPIBoth provide identical clarity; differences in perceived sharpness will be minimal.
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors, deep blacks, and good contrast.
Refresh Rate90Hz90HzBoth provide a smoother visual experience compared to standard 60Hz displays; suitable for gaming and scrolling.
Brightness1100 nits0 nitsOppo Find X3 Neo is much better for outdoor use, easily visible under bright sunlight.

Performance

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoXiaomi Mi 11 LitePractical Impact
ChipsetSnapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+)Snapdragon 732G (8 nm)Find X3 Neo has a significantly more powerful chipset, offering faster processing and better performance for demanding tasks.
AnTuTu Score743,500355,871Find X3 Neo has a much higher benchmark score, translating to noticeably faster app launches and smoother multitasking.
GPUAdreno 650Adreno 618Find X3 Neo offers better graphics performance for gaming and other graphically intensive applications.

Camera

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoXiaomi Mi 11 LitePractical Impact
Main Camera50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56" Sony IMX766, 1.00 µm pixels64MP, f/1.79, 1/1.97" Samsung GW3, 0.70 µm pixelsMi 11 Lite offers higher resolution but Find X3 Neo's larger sensor and bigger pixels generally means better low-light performance.
Selfie Camera32MP, f/2.4, 1/2.74" Sony IMX615, 0.80 µm pixels16MP, f/2.45, Unknown sensor, unknown pixelsFind X3 Neo's higher resolution and wider aperture may result in more detailed and brighter selfies.
Telephoto Lens13MP, f/2.4, 1/3.4" Samsung S5K3M5, 1.00 µm pixelsNot AvailableFind X3 Neo provides optical zoom capabilities for capturing detailed images of distant subjects.
Wide Angle Lens16MP, f/2.2, Unknown sensor, unknown pixels8MP, f/2.2, Unknown sensor, 1.12 µm pixelsFind X3 Neo has a higher resolution for wide angle shots, which might result in more detail in landscape and group photos.
Macro Lens2MP, f/2.4, 1/5" GalaxyCore GC02M1, 1.75 µm pixels5MP, f/2.4, Unknown sensor, 1.12 µm pixelsMi 11 Lite offers a higher resolution macro lens, capturing finer details in close-up shots.
Video Recording4K@60fps, 1080p@60fps with HDR, EIS, Slow-motion: Yes, 480 fps4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps with EIS, 1080p@120fps, Slow-motion: Yes, 960 fpsBoth offer 4K recording, but Find X3 Neo offers 60fps. Mi 11 Lite offers higher slow-motion recording.
Camera FeaturesOIS, PDAF, CDAF, Quadruple camera, Dual shotTriple camera, Digital zoomFind X3 Neo offers more advanced camera features for higher quality images and versatile shooting options.
DXOMark Score106 (Mobile), 104 (Photo), 106 (Video)Not AvailableOppo Find X3 Neo has a higher overall rating (106), photo score (104), and video score (106).

Battery

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoXiaomi Mi 11 LitePractical Impact
Capacity4500mAh4250mAhFind X3 Neo has a slightly larger battery, potentially resulting in longer battery life.
Charging65W Fast Charging33W Fast ChargingFind X3 Neo charges much faster, reducing downtime and keeping the device ready faster.
FeaturesReverse ChargingNoneOppo Find X3 Neo can charge other devices wirelessly, a handy feature.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Find X3 Neo Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 865 chipset offers significantly better processing and gaming performance compared to the Snapdragon 732G.
  • Brighter Display: 1100 nits peak brightness ensures excellent visibility even in direct sunlight.
  • Faster Charging: 65W fast charging significantly reduces charging time, more convenient for on-the-go usage.
  • Better Camera System: Offers OIS, better low-light performance with a larger sensor, a telephoto lens, and higher resolution on the front and wide-angle cameras.
  • Advanced Audio: Provides Hi-Res Audio, resulting in better audio quality and separation when using headphones.
  • Reverse Charging: Ability to wirelessly charge other devices, adding convenience.
  • Better Connectivity: Faster WiFi speeds and more satellite support.

Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite Advantages:

  • Lighter and Thinner: More portable and comfortable for prolonged use.
  • Higher Resolution Main Camera: 64MP main camera might be preferred by some users for more detailed images.
  • Higher Resolution Macro Lens: Might be better for capturing very detailed close-up shots
  • More Advanced Slow-Motion Video: Offers up to 960fps slow motion recording.
  • Side Mounted Fingerprint Sensor: Some may prefer the convenience of a side mounted fingerprint sensor over a basic sensor.

Trade-offs:

  • Oppo Find X3 Neo: Heavier and thicker, and is more expensive.
  • Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite: Significantly lower performance, less capable main camera sensor, lacks a telephoto lens, lower brightness screen, and slower charging.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Find X3 Neo:

  • Ideal User: Performance-focused users who value fast processing, gaming, camera capabilities, and outdoor visibility.
  • Use Cases:
    • Mobile gamers requiring smooth graphics and quick loading.
    • Photographers who want a versatile camera system with good zoom capabilities.
    • Users who often use their phone in bright sunlight.
    • Professionals needing a fast and responsive device for multitasking.
    • Users that prioritize audio quality, and convenience.

Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite:

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users who prioritize a lightweight design and are not too demanding with performance.
  • Use Cases:
    • Casual users who want a stylish and easy to carry phone.
    • Users who prioritize main camera resolution, macro, and slow-motion video.
    • Users who do not require high-end gaming or multitasking capabilities.
    • Users who want an affordable phone that still has essential features.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Performance Needs: How important is high-end performance for gaming and multitasking?
  2. Camera Priorities: Is versatility and low light performance more important than main camera resolution, and slow-motion?
  3. Form Factor: Do you prioritize a lightweight and thin phone or are you willing to trade this off for better features?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1 (Performance & Gaming): If you prioritize smooth gaming, fast app loading, and high-end processing, the Oppo Find X3 Neo is the clear choice.
  • Scenario 2 (Budget & Portability): If you want a lightweight and stylish phone and are on a tighter budget, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite is more suitable.
  • Scenario 3 (Balanced User): If you prioritize a well-rounded device with a great display, good performance, and camera with more features then the Oppo Find X3 Neo is the better choice, as the Xiaomi has too many trade offs.

My Choice

If I were choosing between these two phones, I would pick the Oppo Find X3 Neo.

Here's why:

  • Performance is paramount for me. The Snapdragon 865 in the Oppo Find X3 Neo is significantly more powerful than the Snapdragon 732G in the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and a better gaming experience, which are all important for my daily use.
  • I prioritize a versatile camera system. The telephoto lens, OIS, and larger main camera sensor on the Oppo Find X3 Neo are significant advantages for me over the Xiaomi.
  • The higher display brightness of the Oppo Find X3 Neo is a necessity. I often use my phone outdoors, and the higher brightness makes it much more convenient.
  • Faster charging is also a big plus since it minimizes the time I spend tethered to a power outlet.
  • While the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite is more lightweight and portable, the performance benefits of the Oppo Find X3 Neo are more valuable to me. The minor size difference is a worthy trade-off for the vastly superior performance.

While the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite has its appeal, especially for those on a budget and those who are focused on the macro and slow-motion features, the Oppo Find X3 Neo better suits my needs and preferences due to its more robust performance, camera system, display brightness, and faster charging. I think its feature set is worth the difference in price, and the weight difference is a good trade-off.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.