Oppo Find X3 Neo vs Xiaomi 11T Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 19, 2021 October 5, 2021
Release Year 2021 2021

Physical

Volume 92.74 cm³ 111.05 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.56 "/g 3.27 "/g
Weight 184 g 204 g
Height 159.9 mm 164.1 mm
Width 72.5 mm 76.9 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Galactic Silver
  • Starlight Black
  • Meteorite Gray
  • Moonlight White
  • Celestial Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.55 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.3 % 85.1 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits 800 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1100 nits 1000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.89 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.52 mAh/cm³ 45.02 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 650 Adreno 660

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 11
Maximum OS Version 12 13

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Here's a detailed comparison of the Oppo Find X3 Neo and Xiaomi 11T Pro, focusing on real-world implications:

Design & Build

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoXiaomi 11T ProPractical Impact
Dimensions159.9 × 72.5 × 8 mm164.1 × 76.9 × 8.8 mmXiaomi 11T Pro is larger and may be less comfortable for one-handed use. Find X3 Neo is more compact.
Weight184g204gOppo Find X3 Neo is lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use and portability.
BuildStandardStandardBoth are standard smartphone builds, not foldable.
Screen ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5Corning Gorilla Glass VictusXiaomi 11T Pro offers superior drop and scratch resistance.

Display

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoXiaomi 11T ProPractical Impact
Size6.55"6.67"Xiaomi 11T Pro has a slightly larger screen for a more immersive viewing experience; Find X3 Neo is slightly more pocketable.
Resolution1080x24001080x2400Both provide sharp visuals at Full HD+ resolution.
PPI402395Both have very similar pixel density, so differences in sharpness will be nearly imperceptible.
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors, deep blacks, and excellent contrast.
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzXiaomi 11T Pro has smoother scrolling and animations, making it feel more fluid.
Brightness1100 nits1000 nitsOppo Find X3 Neo is brighter, providing better visibility under direct sunlight.

Performance

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoXiaomi 11T ProPractical Impact
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 865 5G (7nm+)Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (5nm)Xiaomi 11T Pro has a more powerful and efficient chipset, resulting in faster app launches and better gaming performance.
AnTuTu Score743,500863,489Xiaomi 11T Pro offers notably better performance in demanding tasks, although both are flagship tier.
GPUAdreno 650Adreno 660Xiaomi 11T Pro's GPU provides better graphics performance for gaming and demanding applications.

Camera

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoXiaomi 11T ProPractical Impact
Main Camera50MP (f/1.8, 1/1.56" Sony IMX766)108MP (f/1.75, 1/1.52" Samsung S5KHM2)Xiaomi 11T Pro's main sensor captures higher detail, while Oppo excels in low light.
Selfie Camera32MP (f/2.4, 1/2.74" Sony IMX615)16MP (f/2.45, 1/3.06" Omnivision OV16A10)Oppo Find X3 Neo takes higher resolution selfies, the Xiaomi has larger pixel size.
Telephoto13MP (f/2.4, 1/3.4" Samsung S5K3M5)NoneOppo Find X3 Neo offers optical zoom capabilities.
Wide-Angle16MP (f/2.2)8MP (f/2.2, 1/2.8" Sony IMX355)Oppo Find X3 Neo captures higher resolution wide-angle shots.
Macro2MP (f/2.4, 1/5" GalaxyCore GC02M1)5MP (f/2.4, 1/5" Samsung S5K5E9)Xiaomi 11T Pro offers slightly better macro detail.
Video Recording4K@30/60fps with HDR, EIS; Slow-motion 480fps8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps with HDR, EIS; Slow-motion 960fpsXiaomi 11T Pro can record higher resolution videos and has superior slow-motion capabilities.
DXOMARK ScoreMobile: 106 (Photo: 104, Video: 106)Mobile: 108 (Photo: 110, Video: 126) Selfie: 121 (Photo: 111, Video: 137)Xiaomi 11T Pro has better overall camera performance and significantly superior video. Selfie scores only available for Xiaomi.
FeaturesOptical zoom, OIS, Quadruple camera8K Video, Triple Camera, Ultra Stable VideoThe Oppo excels in zoom capabilities, while the Xiaomi focuses on high quality video.

Battery

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoXiaomi 11T ProPractical Impact
Capacity4500mAh5000mAhXiaomi 11T Pro likely offers longer battery life, especially for heavy users.
Charging65W120WXiaomi 11T Pro charges significantly faster, reducing charging times dramatically.
Battery FeaturesReverse chargingTwo 2500mAh cellsOppo Find X3 Neo can wirelessly charge other devices, while Xiaomi uses a dual-cell configuration for faster charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Find X3 Neo Advantages:

  • Lighter and More Compact: Easier to handle and carry.
  • Brighter Display: Better outdoor visibility.
  • Telephoto Lens: Offers optical zoom for better close-up shots.
  • Higher Resolution Front Camera: Captures more detailed selfies.
  • Reverse Wireless Charging: Can charge other devices wirelessly.

Practical Implications: The Find X3 Neo is ideal for users who value portability, good daylight visibility, and versatile camera capabilities with optical zoom.

Xiaomi 11T Pro Advantages:

  • More Powerful Chipset: Faster overall performance, better for gaming and demanding apps.
  • Higher Refresh Rate Display: Smoother animations and scrolling.
  • Larger Battery: Longer usage time between charges.
  • Faster Charging: Significantly reduces charging time.
  • Higher Resolution Video Recording: Records 8K video, suitable for high-quality content creation.
  • Superior Video Performance: Better scores in video recordings and stability.
  • Newer Bluetooth Version: Slightly improved connection.
  • Enhanced Audio: Dolby Atmos and dual microphones.
  • Superior Screen Protection: Greater resistance to damage.

Practical Implications: The Xiaomi 11T Pro is better for users who prioritize performance, smooth display, battery life, fast charging and high-quality video recording.

Significant Trade-offs:

  • The Oppo Find X3 Neo sacrifices processing power and battery for a more compact design and a telephoto lens.
  • The Xiaomi 11T Pro is larger and heavier but offers better overall performance and battery life. The telephoto lens is missing

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Find X3 Neo:

  • Ideal User:
    • Users who prioritize a sleek, lightweight design.
    • Photography enthusiasts who want the versatility of a telephoto lens and excellent selfie quality.
    • Users who value a very bright screen for outdoor use.
    • Those who want reverse wireless charging capability.
  • Use Cases:
    • Everyday carry where pocketability is key.
    • Travel photography with the optical zoom.
    • Outdoor usage in bright environments.
    • Charging other devices on the go.

Xiaomi 11T Pro:

  • Ideal User:
    • Gamers and power users who demand top-tier performance.
    • Video creators who want high-resolution 8K recording.
    • Users who prioritize a long battery life and fast charging.
    • Those who want a smooth and fluid display with 120Hz refresh rate.
    • Those who want top-notch video recording capabilities and quality.
  • Use Cases:
    • Mobile gaming and demanding applications.
    • Filming high-quality video.
    • Daily heavy usage without needing frequent charging.
    • Enjoying a visually smoother experience.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Do you prioritize a compact design and optical zoom, or top-tier performance, a large battery, fast charging and video quality?
  2. How important is battery life and charging speed for your typical usage?
  3. Which camera features are most important to you, particularly zoom or high-quality video recording?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Photography Enthusiast (General Use): If you value versatile photography, the Oppo Find X3 Neo's telephoto lens and high-resolution front camera might be more appealing, despite the Xiaomi having a better camera overall, it lacks an optical zoom.

  • Scenario 2: Power User/Gamer: If you need top-tier performance, long battery life, fast charging, and high video quality the Xiaomi 11T Pro is the clear choice.

  • Scenario 3: Everyday User: If you want a good all-around smartphone with a focus on portability and good display, the Oppo Find X3 Neo is an adequate choice. However, the Xiaomi offers better performance, battery, and charging, so it is an excellent choice.

My Choice

I would choose the Xiaomi 11T Pro.

Here's why:

  • Future-Proof Performance: The Snapdragon 888 offers a significant performance advantage over the Snapdragon 865. This means better app performance, more fluid multitasking, and a longer usable lifespan.
  • Battery and Charging: The combination of a larger battery and ultra-fast 120W charging is a huge convenience for heavy users, which I am.
  • Superior Display: While both have excellent AMOLED panels, the 120Hz refresh rate of the Xiaomi 11T Pro provides a noticeably smoother and more responsive user experience.
  • Camera: Although the Oppo has some advantages, the Xiaomi has superior video performance, including 8K capabilities. The overall scores on DXOMARK support this, making it the clear better overall camera.
  • Video: Having superior video recording and stability capabilities will be better for my usage.

While the Oppo Find X3 Neo is more compact and offers a telephoto lens, the Xiaomi 11T Pro's benefits in performance, battery, charging, display fluidity, and video capabilities align more closely with my priorities. The slightly larger size is a trade-off I'm willing to make for the performance benefits and significantly better video recording.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.