Oppo Find X3 Neo vs Sony Xperia 5 III - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 19, 2021 October 8, 2021
Release Year 2021 2021

Physical

Volume 92.74 cm³ 87.54 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.56 "/g 3.63 "/g
Weight 184 g 168 g
Height 159.9 mm 157 mm
Width 72.5 mm 68 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Galactic Silver
  • Starlight Black
  • Black
  • Green
  • Pink

Display

Screen Size 6.55 " 6.1 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2520
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.3 % 81.4 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 449 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1100 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.89 mAh/in² 120.94 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.52 mAh/cm³ 51.4 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 4500 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 650 Adreno 660

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.1
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, Video Output

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 11
Maximum OS Version 12 13

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoSony Xperia 5 IIIPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions159.9 x 72.5 x 8 mm157 x 68 x 8.2 mmThe Oppo is slightly taller and wider, while the Sony is a bit thicker, potentially affecting single-handed use.
Weight184g168gThe Sony is noticeably lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use.
Display
Size6.55"6.1"The Oppo has a larger screen, better for media consumption and multitasking, while the Sony is more compact.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2520The Sony has a slightly sharper display, leading to marginally more detail.
Pixel Density (PPI)402449The Sony has a moderately sharper display, resulting in crisper text and images.
TechnologyAMOLEDOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzThe Sony's higher refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations.
Brightness1100 nits0 nitsThe Oppo is significantly brighter, offering better outdoor visibility, while the Sony's nits are not specified.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+)Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm)The Sony has a newer and more powerful chipset, translating to better overall performance in demanding tasks and gaming.
AnTuTu Score743,500880,000The Sony scores higher in benchmarks, suggesting superior performance.
GPUAdreno 650Adreno 660The Sony's more powerful GPU allows for better gaming performance with more graphic details.
Camera
Standard Camera Resolution50MP12MPThe Oppo's higher megapixel count may lead to more detailed photos in good lighting.
Standard Camera Aperturef/1.8f/1.7The Sony's wider aperture allows more light, which is helpful in low-light conditions.
Standard Camera Sensor Size1/1.56"Not SpecifiedThe Oppo's larger sensor should provide better light sensitivity for higher dynamic range photos.
Selfie Camera Resolution32MP8MPThe Oppo's higher megapixel selfie camera allows for more detailed selfies.
Selfie Camera Aperturef/2.4f/2.0The Sony's wider aperture allows more light, which can help in low-light selfies.
Telephoto Camera Resolution13MP12MPBoth phones offer similar telephoto resolutions.
Telephoto Camera Aperturef/2.4f/2.2The Sony's slightly wider aperture will allow more light for better zoom quality.
Wide Angle Camera Resolution16MP12MPThe Oppo has a slightly higher wide-angle resolution.
Wide Angle Camera Aperturef/2.2f/2.3The Oppo's wider aperture will allow slightly more light to enter the lens.
Macro Lens2MPNot AvailableOppo includes a dedicated macro lens for close-up shots.
Video RecordingUp to 4K@60fpsUp to 4K@120fpsThe Sony offers significantly more recording options, including a higher frame rate for slow motion.
DXOMark Score106 (Mobile)Not AvailableOppo received a DxOMark score of 106.
Battery
Capacity4500mAh4500mAhBoth have the same battery capacity, indicating comparable battery life.
Charging Speed65W30WThe Oppo charges much faster, minimizing downtime.
FeaturesReverse ChargingBypass ChargingThe Oppo can charge other devices; The Sony can be powered directly while gaming, reducing heat build up from charging.
Software
OSAndroid 11 (Upgradable to 12)Android 11 (Upgradable to 13)The Sony has an edge with a guaranteed update to a newer version of Android.
Connectivity
WiFiWi-Fi 6, MIMOWi-Fi 6Both support modern Wi-Fi standards; Oppo has MIMO
Bluetooth5.15.2The Sony has a more recent version, potentially better range and efficiency.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, L1+L5, E1+E5aThe Sony offers more accurate location tracking with dual-band GPS.
SIMDual Nano SIMDual Nano SIMBoth support two SIM cards.
Storage
Internal Storage128/256GB128/256GBBoth have the same maximum storage, but neither offer storage expansion.
RAM12GB8GBThe Oppo's additional RAM is better for heavy multitasking and demanding games.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither offer microSD card support.
Audio
Audio QualityHi-Res Audio, Stereo SpeakersDolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo SpeakersThe Sony offers better audio with Dolby Atmos and Hi-Res Audio.
Security
Fingerprint SensorBasicSide-mountedThe Sony's side-mounted fingerprint scanner is typically more ergonomic.
Build Quality
Screen ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5Corning Gorilla Glass 6The Sony offers a more robust layer of protection against scratches.
Sensors
SensorsBiometric, Proximity, Motion, Gravity, PedometerBiometric, Proximity, Motion, Barometer, HallThe Sony has a barometer for altitude measurement.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Find X3 Neo Advantages:

  • Larger Display: A bigger 6.55" screen makes it better for media consumption and multitasking.
  • Faster Charging: 65W charging significantly reduces the time spent plugged into a wall.
  • Brighter Display: 1100 nits brightness greatly improves outdoor visibility in bright sunlight.
  • More RAM: 12GB of RAM provides an advantage for heavy users, multitasking and gaming.
  • Higher Resolution Selfie Camera: 32MP front camera captures more detailed selfies.
  • Macro Camera: A dedicated macro lens enables detailed close-up photos.
  • Reverse Charging: Can charge other devices wirelessly.
  • Higher Resolution Main Camera: 50MP main camera captures more detailed photos under good lighting.

Sony Xperia 5 III Advantages:

  • More Powerful Chipset: The Snapdragon 888 offers better overall performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Higher Refresh Rate: 120Hz display provides smoother scrolling and animations.
  • Better Video Recording: Captures 4K video at up to 120fps for smoother playback and slow motion effects, with advanced OIS and EIS features.
  • More Refined Main Camera: Offers a wider aperture (f/1.7) for better low-light performance and larger pixel sizes, which will aid with low-light shots.
  • Better Audio: Includes Dolby Atmos for enhanced spatial audio and immersion.
  • Better Bluetooth: More advanced 5.2 version, with potentially better connectivity.
  • More Accurate GPS: Dual-band GPS offers greater positional accuracy.
  • Side-mounted Fingerprint Sensor: More ergonomic than a basic one.
  • Better Screen Protection: Gorilla Glass 6 provides enhanced scratch resistance.
  • Bypass Charging: Allows to power the device directly while gaming to mitigate heat generated by charging.
  • More up-to-date OS Support: One additional Android OS update (up to Android 13).
  • Lighter Weight: 16g lighter than the Oppo, contributing to better comfort for long periods.

Trade-offs:

  • The Oppo sacrifices the higher refresh rate and more powerful chipset for a brighter display and faster charging.
  • The Sony sacrifices a larger display and some charging speed for higher performance, a better camera system, and more advanced features.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Find X3 Neo Ideal Users:

  • Media Consumers: Those who watch videos, browse content, and multitask, and need a large, bright display.
  • Fast Paced Users: Users who need their phone to charge quickly to avoid long charging times.
  • Selfie Enthusiasts: Users who take many selfies and need high-resolution images.
  • Everyday Photographers: Casual photographers who will benefit from the 50MP main camera.

Use Cases:

  • Watching movies and TV shows on a bright, large screen.
  • Multitasking between apps with the 12GB of RAM.
  • Taking lots of selfies.
  • Quickly charging the phone for use throughout the day.
  • Capturing everyday moments in detail.

Sony Xperia 5 III Ideal Users:

  • Performance Seekers: Gamers and users who need smooth performance.
  • Multimedia Creators: Those who record and edit videos and appreciate high-quality footage.
  • Audiophiles: Those who prioritize high-quality audio playback.
  • Photography Enthusiasts: Users who need a refined camera system with better low-light performance.

Use Cases:

  • Playing graphic-intensive games with a smooth refresh rate and strong GPU.
  • Recording high-quality video footage for vlogs and videos.
  • Listening to music with enhanced audio.
  • Taking photos and videos in low-light environments.
  • Using the phone for extended periods with its lightweight design and bypass charging.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • The Oppo focuses more on display and charging capabilities.
  • The Sony focuses more on processing power, camera performance, and audio quality.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Do you prioritize a large, bright display or the best performance? (Oppo excels in the former, Sony in the latter)
  2. Is fast charging a necessity or is advanced camera performance more important? (Oppo has faster charging, Sony has a better camera system)
  3. Do you need the convenience of a Macro camera or is high quality audio a must-have? (Oppo offers a macro lens, Sony offers superior audio with Dolby Atmos)

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • For the casual user, mostly using the phone for social media, watching videos, and taking occasional photos: The Oppo Find X3 Neo may be more suitable with its larger screen and faster charging.
  • For the user who values gaming, higher performance, video quality, and audio: The Sony Xperia 5 III would be the better choice.
  • For photography enthusiasts needing a refined camera system and versatility: the Sony Xperia 5 III with its more flexible and adaptable camera system is the best choice.
  • For users who need maximum display visibility in direct sunlight: the Oppo Find X3 Neo will excel.

My Choice

If I were choosing between these two phones, I would personally pick the Sony Xperia 5 III.

Here's Why:

  1. Performance: As a user who often engages in mobile gaming and uses multiple applications, I highly value the more advanced chipset. The Snapdragon 888 offers a more noticeable improvement in day-to-day performance.

  2. Camera Quality: I place a high value on camera quality. While the Oppo has a higher megapixel count in some cases, the Sony’s wider aperture and overall refined image processing makes it better for my needs. The 4k@120fps video recording is a significant advantage.

  3. Audio Experience: I enjoy music and movies. The Dolby Atmos support on the Sony makes the viewing experience more enjoyable, making it superior for my use case.

  4. Long-Term Use: With an additional promised Android update, the Sony provides better long-term software support.

While I appreciate the Oppo's larger display and faster charging, the Sony's performance, camera, and audio capabilities align better with my priorities. The slightly smaller size of the Sony also makes it more pocketable, while not making the screen size too small.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.