1. Specifications Comparison
Design
| Feature | Oppo Find X3 Neo | Sony Xperia 1 IV | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Size | 159.9 × 72.5 × 8 mm | 165 × 71 × 8.2 mm | Sony is taller, Oppo is wider; slight difference in hand feel, pocketability. |
| Weight | 184g | 185g | Virtually identical, no noticeable difference in hand. |
Display
| Feature | Oppo Find X3 Neo | Sony Xperia 1 IV | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Size | 6.55" | 6.5" | Negligible difference; Both offer ample screen real estate. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1644x3840 | Sony's higher resolution means sharper images and text, more detail especially for media consumption and viewing detailed content. |
| PPI | 402 | 643 | Sony has a noticeably sharper display, individual pixels are harder to see on Xperia. |
| Technology | AMOLED | OLED | Similar display quality. Both offer vibrant colors and deep blacks. |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 120Hz | Sony has smoother scrolling and animations. More fluid experience for gaming and general usage. |
| Brightness | 1100 nits | 0 nits | Oppo offers significantly better outdoor visibility under bright sunlight, however, the lack of nits in the provided data for Sony might be an oversight. |
Performance
| Feature | Oppo Find X3 Neo | Sony Xperia 1 IV | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Sony offers better overall performance, faster app loading, smoother multitasking; also more future-proof. |
| AnTuTu Score | 743,500 | 1,076,100 | Sony demonstrates noticeably faster performance, especially for demanding tasks like gaming. |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 730 | Sony offers superior graphics performance; Better gaming experience and smoother rendering of graphical content. |
Camera
| Feature | Oppo Find X3 Neo | Sony Xperia 1 IV | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main Camera | 50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56", 1.00µm, Sony IMX766 | 12MP, f/1.7, 1.80µm, Sony Exmor RS | Oppo has higher resolution, potentially more detail in good light; Sony has larger pixels and wider aperture, potentially better low-light performance. |
| Selfie Camera | 32MP, f/2.4, 1/2.74", 0.80µm, Sony IMX615 | 12MP, f/2.0 | Oppo has higher resolution; Sony has wider aperture for better low light performance. |
| Telephoto Lens | 13MP, f/2.4, 1/3.4", 1.00µm, Samsung S5K3M5 | 12MP, f/2.3, 1/3.5", 1.00µm, Sony IMX650 Exmor RS | Similar capabilities. Oppo has a slightly larger sensor. Sony has a slightly wider aperture. |
| Wide Angle Lens | 16MP, f/2.2 | 12MP, f/2.2, Sony Exmor RS | Oppo provides slightly more detail with its higher resolution. |
| ToF 3D Sensor | None | Present | Sony offers depth sensing for potentially better portrait mode effects and AR applications. |
| Macro Lens | 2MP, f/2.4, 1/5", 1.75µm, GalaxyCore GC02M1 | None | Oppo allows you to take detailed close-up shots |
| Video | 4K@60fps HDR, EIS; 480fps slow-motion | 4K@120fps HDR, OIS, EIS; 960fps slow-motion | Sony offers higher framerate 4K recording with OIS and superior slow-motion capabilities. |
| DXOMark Score | Main: 106 (Photo 104, Video 106) | Main: 105 (Photo 107, Video 92) | Oppo wins on overall score, but has a slightly worse photo score, but a superior video score |
| Features | OIS, EIS, CDAF, Dual shot, Night Mode | OIS, EIS, Ultra stable video, RAW | Oppo has features that might appeal to casual users, Sony has professional-level features. |
Battery
| Feature | Oppo Find X3 Neo | Sony Xperia 1 IV | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4500mAh | 5000mAh | Sony has a larger battery, likely longer battery life. |
| Charging | 65W fast charging | 30W fast charging | Oppo charges significantly faster, reducing charging time. |
| Features | Reverse charging | Bypass Charging | Oppo can charge other devices wirelessly; Sony can bypass battery charging for direct power during prolonged gaming. |
Other
| Feature | Oppo Find X3 Neo | Sony Xperia 1 IV | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| OS | Android 11 (upgradable to 12) | Android 12 (upgradable to 13) | Sony has a newer OS version with more up-to-date features and potentially longer software support. |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 6, MIMO | Wi-Fi 6 | Similar performance, Oppo offers slightly better wifi performance with MIMO. |
| Bluetooth | 5.1, aptX, LDAC, AAC | 5.2, aptX, LDAC, AAC, AVRCP, DIP, GAVDP, GAP, HFP, HID, HSP, MAP, PAN, SPP, OPP, PBAP/PAB, HDP | Sony has newer version and broader set of features, better connectivity with different devices, specifically audio accessories. |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, GPS (L1+L5), Galileo (E1+E5a) | Sony offers greater accuracy in GPS location, especially in challenging environments due to dual-band GPS support. |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano + Nano) | Dual SIM (Nano + eSIM) | Sony's eSIM support provides more flexibility for managing multiple mobile plans; Oppo uses dual physical SIM cards. |
| Internal Storage | 128/256GB | 256/512GB | Sony offers more storage capacity, providing space for more files, apps and media. |
| RAM | 12GB | 12/16GB | Sony offers more ram on higher end model, providing better multitasking performance for heavy users. |
| Expandable Storage | No | No | Neither phone supports expandable storage, limiting the amount of media you can carry. |
| Audio Quality | Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers | Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers | Sony offers superior audio, with Dolby Atmos; both provide quality sound reproduction. |
| Security | Basic Fingerprint sensor | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor | Sony offers faster and more convenient unlocking with a side-mounted sensor. |
| Build Quality | Gorilla Glass 5 | Gorilla Glass Victus | Sony has better scratch/impact resistance. |
| Sensors | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Barometer, Hall | Sony offers more sensors suitable for advanced features and gaming. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Oppo Find X3 Neo Advantages
- Faster Charging: 65W charging is significantly faster than Sony's 30W, getting you back up and running quicker.
- Higher Main Camera Resolution: 50MP main camera captures more detail in good lighting conditions.
- Brighter Display: 1100 nits brightness is crucial for outdoor visibility.
- Reverse Charging: Ability to charge other devices wirelessly.
- Better Video DxoMark score: Better video performance compared to the Sony Xperia 1 IV.
- Macro Lens: Dedicated macro lens for close up detailed shots.
Sony Xperia 1 IV Advantages
- Higher Performance: Newer Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 provides a significant performance boost in all tasks.
- Sharper Display: Higher resolution and PPI provides a visibly crisper and more detailed display.
- Smoother Display: 120Hz refresh rate results in smoother animations and scrolling.
- Larger Battery: Offers improved battery life.
- Advanced Camera Features: Offers professional features like 4K video recording at 120fps, RAW capture and a ToF 3D sensor for better portrait photos.
- Better Audio: Dolby Atmos provides a slight edge in audio features.
- eSIM Support: Greater flexibility in managing multiple mobile plans.
- Better Connectivity: Newest Bluetooth version and dual-band GPS.
- Better Build Quality: Corning Gorilla Glass Victus screen protection
- More RAM: Higher ram model gives even better multitasking performance.
Trade-offs
- Oppo Find X3 Neo: Trade-off between slightly older tech and better charging speeds and a brighter display.
- Sony Xperia 1 IV: Trade-off between the better tech, slightly worse charging speeds, slightly less bright screen and worse video score.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Oppo Find X3 Neo
- Ideal User: Those who prioritize fast charging, a brighter display, a good main camera, and are less demanding in terms of raw performance and multimedia.
- Use Cases:
- General daily use, social media, and casual photography.
- Users who often need to charge their phones multiple times a day.
- Outdoor enthusiasts who need a bright, visible screen.
- Users who like to take macro photos.
- Price-to-Value: Offers a balance of features at a slightly more affordable price point.
Sony Xperia 1 IV
- Ideal User: Performance-focused users who want the best possible display quality, advanced camera capabilities, and cutting edge audio.
- Use Cases:
- Mobile gamers who need maximum performance.
- Photography enthusiasts who want manual camera controls and post-processing flexibility.
- Media consumers who value a high-quality, immersive display.
- Users who need robust connectivity and accurate location tracking.
- Professional videographers who need 120fps 4k recording.
- Price-to-Value: Higher price for top-tier performance and features.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions:
What do you prioritize most: Charging speed or raw performance?
- Fast charging users, look at Oppo; for high-performance look at Sony.
How important is display quality for your specific use case?
- If the sharpest screen is vital, go with Sony; if you need a brighter screen outdoors go with Oppo
Are you primarily a casual user, or do you need advanced features?
- If you are a casual user, go with Oppo; for advanced use cases look at the Sony.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Outdoorsy photographer: The Oppo Find X3 Neo's brighter screen is better for outdoor visibility.
- Scenario 2: Mobile Gamer: The Sony Xperia 1 IV's superior performance and 120Hz display offer a smoother gaming experience.
- Scenario 3: On the Go user: Oppo's faster charging, is more appealing.
- Scenario 4: Professional content creator: The Sony Xperia 1 IV's superior video recording and audio capabilities, make it the better choice.
What I Would Choose and Why
If I were choosing between these two phones, I would select the Sony Xperia 1 IV. While the Oppo Find X3 Neo has its strengths, particularly its faster charging and brighter display, the overall package offered by the Sony Xperia 1 IV is more compelling for my needs.
Here’s why:
- Performance: I prioritize performance and the newer Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 in the Sony is a huge draw. The higher AnTuTu score translates to a smoother overall experience and is more future-proof, which is important for me.
- Display Quality: The higher resolution and PPI of the Sony's display will make a noticeable difference for media consumption and general use. I prefer a sharper and more detailed image.
- Camera Capabilities: Although Oppo excels in general video quality, the Sony's overall camera array, featuring professional features like RAW capture, 120fps 4k video recording, is preferable and future proof, since I appreciate manual camera controls and flexibility.
- Battery Life: I need a reliable battery life that will last me a full day of heavy use.
- Build Quality: I prefer better scratch protection, as offered by Gorilla Glass Victus, and I am not worried about fast charging, since I usually charge overnight.
While I acknowledge the convenience of Oppo's fast charging and the value of its brighter screen, the superior overall performance, better screen quality, greater feature set, and better overall build offered by the Sony Xperia 1 IV aligns more closely with my needs, which is a top-tier performing, camera-centric phone, which will last for years to come.
