Oppo Find X3 Neo vs Samsung Galaxy M32 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 19, 2021 June 28, 2021
Release Year 2021 2021

Physical

Volume 92.74 cm³ 99.02 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.56 "/g 3.56 "/g
Weight 184 g 180 g
Height 159.9 mm 159.3 mm
Width 72.5 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Galactic Silver
  • Starlight Black
  • Black
  • Light Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.55 " 6.4 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.3 % 83.9 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 411 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 800 nits
Peak Brightness 1100 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.89 mAh/in² 122.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.52 mAh/cm³ 50.49 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 650 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 11
Maximum OS Version 12 13

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Here's a detailed comparison of the Oppo Find X3 Neo and Samsung Galaxy M32, focusing on practical implications:

Design

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoSamsung Galaxy M32Practical Impact
Physical Size159.9 x 72.5 x 8 mm159.3 x 74 x 8.4 mmOppo is slightly taller, narrower, and thinner. Samsung is wider and thicker. Overall they are similar size
Weight184g180gNegligible difference; both are relatively lightweight and comfortable for daily use.
Build MaterialNot providedNot providedHard to compare build quality due to missing data, but both are likely to use a mix of plastic and glass.

Display

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoSamsung Galaxy M32Practical Impact
Size6.55"6.4"Oppo offers a slightly larger viewing area, better for media consumption and multitasking.
Resolution1080x24001080x2400Both have sharp displays, with ample pixel density for detailed content.
PPI402411Both displays are very sharp; negligible difference in perceived sharpness.
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors, deep blacks, and excellent contrast, beneficial for watching videos and gaming.
Refresh Rate90Hz90HzSmooth scrolling and animations, making daily interactions feel fluid.
Brightness1100 nits0 nitsOppo is dramatically brighter, offering much better visibility in direct sunlight. The Samsung is likely to be hard to see in bright outdoor conditions

Performance

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoSamsung Galaxy M32Practical Impact
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+)Mediatek Helio G80 (12 nm)Oppo's chipset is significantly more powerful, resulting in faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and higher gaming performance.
AnTuTu Score743,500204,000The Oppo delivers a dramatically superior performance across all aspects of the phone experience, with significantly higher score.
GPUAdreno 650Mali-G52 MC2Oppo's GPU is far more capable, leading to better gaming graphics and performance.

Camera

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoSamsung Galaxy M32Practical Impact
Standard Camera50MP (f/1.8, 1/1.56", Sony IMX766, 1.0µm)64MP (f/1.8)Samsung's higher megapixel count doesn't necessarily mean better photos. Oppo's larger sensor and higher quality sensor tends to capture more light and offer better image quality.
Selfie Camera32MP (f/2.4, 1/2.74", Sony IMX615, 0.8µm)20MP (f/2.2)Oppo's selfie camera has a higher resolution; Samsung has a slightly wider aperture, possibly better in low-light. Oppo uses higher quality Sony sensor
Telephoto Lens13MP (f/2.4, 1/3.4", Samsung S5K3M5, 1.0µm)Not AvailableOppo has a dedicated telephoto lens, enabling optical zoom for better zoomed photos, while Samsung lacks this feature, relying on digital zoom, which reduces quality.
Wide Angle Lens16MP (f/2.2)8MP (f/2.2)Oppo offers a significantly higher resolution wide-angle camera, capturing more detail in wide shots.
Portrait LensNot Available2MP (f/2.4)Samsung has a dedicated depth sensor to improve bokeh/portrait mode, which Oppo is lacking
Macro Lens2MP (f/2.4, 1/5", GalaxyCore GC02M1, 1.75µm)2MP (f/2.4)Both phones offer a similar 2MP macro lens for close-up shots, but image quality isn't the greatest on either phone.
Video RecordingUp to 4K@60fps, HDR, EIS1080p@30fpsOppo records higher-quality video with higher resolutions and frame rates. Oppo also supports EIS (Electronic Image Stabilization) for smoother videos.
DXOMark Score106Not AvailableOppo has good camera performance. Samsung camera performance unknown.

Battery

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoSamsung Galaxy M32Practical Impact
Capacity4500mAh5000mAhSamsung has a larger battery, likely offering longer battery life on a single charge.
Charging65W fast charging25W fast chargingOppo charges much faster, meaning less time plugged in; Oppo uses Li-Polymer while Samsung uses Li-Ion
Additional FeaturesReverse charging15W inbox chargerOppo's ability to charge other devices is convenient. Samsung includes a charger in the box, which is always welcome

Software & Connectivity

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoSamsung Galaxy M32Practical Impact
OSAndroid 11 (upgradeable to 12)Android 11 (upgradeable to 13)Both offer modern Android functionality. Samsung's slightly newer software upgrade support offers longer-term support.
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6, 802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ax, Dual-band, Hotspot, Direct, Display, MiMO802.11a/b/g/n/ac, Dual-band, Hotspot, Direct, DisplayOppo's supports the newest Wi-Fi 6 technology, offering faster speeds and more efficient connections. Samsung has older standard.
BluetoothBluetooth 5.1 LE, A2DP, aptX, LDAC, SBC, AACBluetooth 5.0, A2DP, AVRCP, DIP, HFP, HID, HSP, MAP, PAN, OPP, PBAP/PAB, HOGPOppo has a newer Bluetooth version with a wider variety of audio codecs that offer higher quality and lower latency, while Samsung supports a wider range of Bluetooth protocols.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoOppo offers a wider range of satellite navigation, enabling higher precision.
SIMDual Nano-SIMDual Nano-SIMBoth support dual SIM capabilities, enabling the use of two numbers on one device.

Storage & Audio

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoSamsung Galaxy M32Practical Impact
Internal Storage128/256 GB64/128 GBOppo offers a larger storage option, good for storing more files and media, especially for the 256GB version.
RAM12 GB4/6/8 GBOppo offers significantly more RAM, allowing for better multitasking, especially for heavier apps and games.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone has expandable storage, so users should buy enough from the start.
Audio QualityHi-Res Audio, Stereo SpeakersBasic audioOppo has higher quality audio and stereo speakers which offers a more immersive audio experience.

Security & Build Quality

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoSamsung Galaxy M32Practical Impact
Fingerprint SensorBasicSide-mountedSamsung's side-mounted sensor can be more ergonomic. Fingerprint type on the Oppo is unknown.
Screen ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5UnknownOppo uses Gorilla Glass 5, which offers superior screen protection against scratches and drops.
SensorsProximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Gravity, PedometerProximity, Accelerometer, Compass, GyroscopeOppo offers two additional sensor: Gravity and Pedometer.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Here's a summary of the major advantages of each phone:

Oppo Find X3 Neo Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 865 chipset provides a significant performance advantage, resulting in much faster overall speeds and smoother operation.
  • Better Display: Higher brightness for excellent sunlight visibility
  • Higher Quality Camera System: Better sensors, a dedicated telephoto lens, higher resolution selfie camera, and 4K recording capability provide a much more versatile photography and video experience.
  • Faster Charging: 65W charging is much faster than Samsung's 25W
  • Premium Features: Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers, Wi-Fi 6, newer Bluetooth version, and reverse charging provide a more premium experience.
  • Better build quality: Gorilla Glass 5 protection

Samsung Galaxy M32 Advantages:

  • Larger Battery: 5000mAh provides slightly longer battery life
  • Newer Android Upgrade: Provides support for newer OS
  • Included Charger: Ships with a 15W in-box charger

Trade-offs:

  • The Oppo sacrifices battery capacity for significantly better performance, a superior camera, and faster charging.
  • The Samsung prioritizes battery life and a newer Android OS over performance and camera quality.
  • Samsung has a portrait camera, which the Oppo is missing

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Find X3 Neo is Ideal for:

  • Power Users: Those who need the fastest performance for heavy multitasking, gaming, or demanding apps.
  • Photography Enthusiasts: Users who want a versatile camera system with high-quality images and video.
  • Media Consumers: Those who want a great display for watching videos with good outdoor visibility and high-fidelity audio.

Specific Use Cases:

  • Gaming: High-end gaming with fast load times, high framerates and smooth graphics.
  • Photography/Videography: Capturing detailed images and high-quality 4K video.
  • Multitasking: Running multiple apps and switching seamlessly with 12GB RAM.
  • Frequent travelers: Good outdoor visibility and fast charging
  • Audio enthusiasts: better audio experience

Samsung Galaxy M32 is Ideal for:

  • Budget-Conscious Users: Those seeking a reliable smartphone with good battery life at an affordable price.
  • Casual Users: Those who mainly use their phone for social media, calls, and light web browsing.
  • Users who prioritize battery life: Those who would rather have more time between charges.
  • Users who want the latest android OS.
  • Users that are more familiar with Samsung

Specific Use Cases:

  • Daily tasks: Basic phone usage, social media, email.
  • Long days away from a charger: Extended battery life for all-day usage.
  • Casual photography: Decent photos in good lighting for sharing.
  • Price conscious users.

4. Decision Framework

Here are three key questions for buyers to consider:

  1. Performance vs. Battery: Do you prioritize fast performance for gaming and heavy apps, or longer battery life for all-day usage?
  2. Camera Quality: Is a high-quality, versatile camera system important to you?
  3. Budget: Are you willing to pay more for superior performance and features, or is a budget-friendly option more important?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: High-Performance User: If you play graphics-intensive games, edit videos on your phone, or use other demanding applications, the Oppo Find X3 Neo is the clear choice.
  • Scenario 2: Battery-Conscious User: If you need a phone that lasts all day on a single charge and don't need the best performance, the Samsung Galaxy M32 is the better option.
  • Scenario 3: Casual User: If your phone usage is limited to basic tasks and you prefer the latest version of Android, the Samsung Galaxy M32 would be sufficient. However, the benefits of the Oppo's superior performance and camera for the same price cannot be ignored.

My Choice

If I had to choose, I would pick the Oppo Find X3 Neo. The significantly better performance, camera system, and faster charging outweigh the benefits of the Samsung's larger battery for my personal use case. While the Samsung does offer a newer OS, the difference is marginal, and the hardware advantages of the Oppo make it the superior choice. Additionally, the display quality and outdoor visibility of the Oppo is a huge plus. The improved audio quality is a feature that I would appreciate as well. Overall, I believe the better display, camera and processing power is well worth the trade-off in battery.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.