1. Specifications Comparison
Design
Feature | Oppo Find X3 Neo | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Practical Impact |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | 159.9 × 72.5 × 8 mm | 165 × 77.4 × 8.4 mm | The Galaxy A72 is noticeably larger and bulkier, potentially less comfortable for one-handed use. The Find X3 Neo is more compact and easier to handle. |
Weight | 184g | 203g | The Find X3 Neo is 19g lighter, making it more comfortable to hold for extended periods. The A72 is heavier which might be noticeable during prolonged use. |
Build Quality (Screen Protection) | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Unknown | Find X3 Neo has superior screen protection which provides better scratch and impact resistance. |
Display
Feature | Oppo Find X3 Neo | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Practical Impact |
---|---|---|---|
Size | 6.55" | 6.7" | The Galaxy A72 has a slightly larger screen, which could be preferred for media consumption. The difference is marginal. |
Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | Both offer the same level of sharpness; no significant difference in display clarity. |
Pixel Density (PPI) | 402 | 394 | Both have excellent pixel density; minimal difference in perceived sharpness. |
Technology | AMOLED | AMOLED | Both offer vibrant colors, deep blacks, and excellent contrast ratios. |
Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 90Hz | Both offer smooth scrolling and animations. |
Brightness | 1100 nits | 800 nits | The Find X3 Neo is significantly brighter, making it much more usable in direct sunlight. The A72 will be harder to see in bright conditions. |
Performance
Feature | Oppo Find X3 Neo | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Practical Impact |
---|---|---|---|
Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (7 nm+) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | The Find X3 Neo's flagship-level chipset provides significantly faster processing, better gaming performance, and smoother multitasking. The A72 has a mid-range chipset, adequate for everyday tasks but struggles with heavy use. |
AnTuTu Score | 743,500 | 285,000 | The Find X3 Neo has a drastically higher AnTuTu score, indicating much faster performance. Expect noticeably quicker app launching and better responsiveness overall. |
GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 618 | The Find X3 Neo has a superior GPU, leading to better graphics performance in games and other GPU-intensive tasks. |
Camera
Feature | Oppo Find X3 Neo | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Practical Impact |
---|---|---|---|
Main Camera Resolution | 50MP | 64MP | The Galaxy A72 has slightly higher megapixel count, but the Find X3 Neo uses the higher quality Sony IMX766 sensor, which translates into better image quality. |
Telephoto + Portrait Camera | None | 8MP | The A72 has a dedicated telephoto camera for portrait shots which provides an additional focal length for flexibility. The Find X3 Neo lacks this feature. |
Selfie Camera Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.2 | The A72's wider aperture might result in slightly better low-light performance for selfies. |
Telephoto Lens Camera | 13MP | None | The Find X3 Neo features a telephoto camera with optical zoom providing better zoom capabilities and the flexibility to capture images at a distance. The A72 does not have this feature. |
Wide-Angle Lens Camera | 16MP | 12MP | The Find X3 Neo has a higher-resolution wide-angle lens, which might provide more detail in wide shots. |
Macro Lens Camera | 2MP | 5MP | The A72 has a higher-resolution macro lens, potentially offering slightly better detail in close-up photos. |
Video Recording | Up to 4K@60fps with HDR & EIS | Up to 4K@30fps with EIS | The Find X3 Neo offers more versatile video options, with higher frame rates and HDR support, which results in a higher level of details and more natural color reproduction. |
DXOMARK Score | Main: 106, Photo: 104, Video: 106 | Main: 92, Photo: 100, Video: 78 | The Find X3 Neo significantly outperforms the A72 in video quality and has a higher overall camera score on DXOMARK. |
Battery
Feature | Oppo Find X3 Neo | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Practical Impact |
---|---|---|---|
Capacity | 4500mAh | 5000mAh | The Galaxy A72 has a larger battery capacity, which is likely to provide longer battery life. |
Charging Speed | 65W Fast Charging | 25W Fast Charging | The Find X3 Neo charges much faster, which will be extremely convenient for users who need to top up quickly. |
Battery Type | Li-Polymer | Li-Ion | Li-Polymer is generally considered safer and has longer lifespan |
Additional Features | Reverse charging | 15W charger included | The Find X3 Neo can charge other devices wirelessly. The A72 comes with a 15W charger included. |
Other
Feature | Oppo Find X3 Neo | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Practical Impact |
---|---|---|---|
Operating System | Android 11 | Android 11 | Both devices were launched with Android 11, with updates to Android 12 available. |
Wi-Fi | WiFi 6 (802.11ax) | 802.11ac | The Find X3 Neo has newer Wi-Fi technology that results in higher connection speed and lower latency on compatible networks |
Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.1 LE | Bluetooth 5.0 | The Find X3 Neo uses a newer version of Bluetooth technology which generally results in better connectivity and lower power consumption. |
RAM | 12 GB | 6 GB or 8 GB | The Find X3 Neo comes with more RAM, resulting in smoother multitasking and better performance under heavy loads. |
Expandable Storage | No | No | Both phones lack expandable storage meaning that users are limited to the internal storage on either device. |
Audio Features | Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers | Both phones have stereo speakers, with the Find X3 Neo supporting Hi-Res audio for a wider range of frequencies. The A72 supports Dolby Atmos for enhanced surround sound, especially when using headphones. |
Security | Fingerprint | Fingerprint | Basic biometric security is present on both devices. |
Sensors | Gravity, Pedometer, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Proximity | Hall, Geomagnetic, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Proximity | Both devices include an array of sensors; the Find X3 Neo includes Gravity and Pedometer while the A72 includes Hall and Geomagnetic. This will not greatly impact the user experience. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Oppo Find X3 Neo Advantages:
- Significantly Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 865 chipset offers flagship-level performance for demanding tasks, gaming, and smooth multitasking. The AnTuTu score highlights the huge difference.
- Brighter Display: The 1100 nits brightness ensures excellent outdoor visibility, making it much better for use in sunny conditions.
- Faster Charging: 65W charging allows for extremely quick top-ups, which is very convenient for users on the go.
- Better Camera Video Quality: Superior video quality due to the better sensor, and video features.
- Newer Wi-Fi and Bluetooth: Offers higher wireless connection speeds on compatible networks, and lower latency.
- More RAM: With 12GB of RAM, the Find X3 Neo can handle multitasking and heavy applications more smoothly.
- Superior Build Quality: The screen uses Corning Gorilla Glass 5.
Samsung Galaxy A72 Advantages:
- Larger Battery: The 5000mAh battery should offer better battery life, which can be crucial for users who are far from power sources often.
- Dedicated Telephoto Camera: The A72 has an additional telephoto camera for portrait shots which adds flexibility and a better zooming experience.
- Wider Selfie Aperture: Offers slightly improved low-light performance for selfies, which might appeal to social media users.
- Dolby Atmos: Offers an enhanced surround sound experience when using headphones, which can be preferable for watching movies.
- Includes 15W Charger: This can be handy for users who do not have a USB charger already.
- More Sensors: The A72 includes a hall and geomagnetic sensor while the Find X3 Neo includes gravity and pedometer sensors. These differences are not very large, but worth noting.
Significant Trade-offs:
- The Find X3 Neo offers significantly better performance, but the Samsung Galaxy A72 has better battery life and additional telephoto camera.
- The Find X3 Neo charges much faster, but the A72 is likely to last longer on a single charge.
- The Find X3 Neo has a much brighter screen and better camera video recording capabilities while the A72 has more audio features (Dolby Atmos).
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Oppo Find X3 Neo - Ideal User:
- Performance-Focused User: Gamers, power users who require fast and smooth performance for demanding applications, and users who often multitask heavily.
- Outdoor Enthusiasts: Users who frequently use their phone in bright sunlight.
- Content Creators: Users who need high-quality video recording and fast charging.
- Users who value speed: Users who value quick charging times and smooth performance.
Use Cases:
- Playing graphic-intensive games.
- Editing high-resolution photos and videos.
- Running multiple apps simultaneously.
- Using the phone in direct sunlight without screen visibility issues.
Samsung Galaxy A72 - Ideal User:
- Battery-Focused User: Users who prioritize long battery life and don't need the best performance.
- Photography Enthusiasts: Users who enjoy using telephoto and macro lenses for diverse types of photography, or who enjoy a wider selfie aperture for low-light performance.
- Multimedia Consumers: Users who enjoy watching movies and listening to music on their phones.
- Value-Oriented Buyers: Users looking for a reliable phone with decent features at a more affordable price point.
Use Cases:
- Extended periods of media consumption.
- Photography and social media usage where long battery life is valuable.
- Everyday smartphone tasks where performance is not critical.
- Listening to movies or music using headphones
Price-to-Value Ratio:
- The Oppo Find X3 Neo provides a better performance, a superior display, and faster charging. This is likely more expensive but offers superior value for performance-focused users.
- The Samsung Galaxy A72 is a more affordable phone with very good battery life and other more modest performance and camera capabilities, and provides good value for those users.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- How important is performance to you? If you're a gamer, heavy multitasker, or use demanding apps, the Find X3 Neo is the better choice. If you primarily use your phone for basic tasks, the A72 will be adequate.
- How important is battery life and charging speed? If you prioritize longer battery life, the A72 may be preferable. If you need to quickly charge your phone, the Find X3 Neo is the clear winner.
- How much do you use the phone outdoors? If you frequently use your phone in direct sunlight, then the Find X3 Neo will be a much better option due to its 1100 nits brightness display.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Heavy Gamer/Power User: Choose the Oppo Find X3 Neo for its superior processing power and performance.
- Scenario 2: Long Battery Life Enthusiast: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A72 for its larger battery capacity.
- Scenario 3: Casual User on a Budget: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A72 for its more affordable price point while still offering very good battery life and features.
- Scenario 4: Users Who Frequently Use Their Phone Outdoors: Choose the Oppo Find X3 Neo for its superior display brightness.
- Scenario 5: Users who use telephoto lens a lot: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A72 for its included telephoto lens.
My Choice
Given my priorities, I would choose the Oppo Find X3 Neo. Here's why:
- Performance Matters: I value smooth and responsive performance for multitasking, gaming, and overall usage. The Snapdragon 865 in the Find X3 Neo provides a significantly better experience than the Snapdragon 720G in the A72.
- Bright Display: I often use my phone outdoors, so the Find X3 Neo's 1100 nits display will be much more usable in direct sunlight.
- Superior video camera: I prefer the versatility of the Find X3 Neo with 4k@60fps videos over the A72 4k@30fps recording, along with the higher DXOMARK score for video quality.
- Fast Charging is Convenient: I value the convenience of fast charging, the 65W charging is a major advantage over the A72.
While the A72 has a larger battery, I prefer the trade-off for better performance, display, and charging speeds, especially since I usually have access to charging points during the day. The A72 might be a great option for someone with less demanding performance needs but who needs better battery life.