Oppo Find X3 Neo vs Samsung Galaxy A54 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 19, 2021 March 24, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 92.74 cm³ 99.5 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.56 "/g 3.17 "/g
Weight 184 g 202 g
Height 159.9 mm 158.2 mm
Width 72.5 mm 76.7 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Galactic Silver
  • Starlight Black
  • White
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime

Display

Screen Size 6.55 " 6.4 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.3 % 82.9 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 403 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 1100 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.89 mAh/in² 122.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.52 mAh/cm³ 50.25 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 650 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 12 17

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Oppo Find X3 Neo vs. Samsung Galaxy A54

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoSamsung Galaxy A54Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions159.9 × 72.5 × 8 mm158.2 × 76.7 × 8.2 mmOppo is slightly taller and narrower. The A54 is wider, potentially impacting one-handed use for some. Both are similarly thin.
Weight184g202gOppo is noticeably lighter, better for extended use and pocket comfort.
BuildGorilla Glass 5 FrontGorilla Glass 5 FrontSimilar scratch resistance for the screen on both devices.
Display
Size6.55"6.4"Oppo has a slightly larger screen, better for media consumption.
Resolution1080x24001080x2340Both are sharp, slight difference in pixel count is imperceptible.
Pixel Density (PPI)402403Identical sharpness; images will appear equally detailed.
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzSamsung provides smoother scrolling and animations.
Brightness1100 nits0 nitsOppo is significantly better in bright sunlight. A54's brightness spec is missing, but in real world use it does not reach 1100 nits.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 865 (7nm+)Exynos 1380 (5nm)Snapdragon 865 in the Oppo offers stronger raw performance.
Antutu Score743,500578,600Oppo is faster in benchmarks, translating to quicker app launches and smoother overall experience.
GPUAdreno 650Mali-G68 MP5Snapdragon's Adreno 650 typically shows better gaming performance.
Battery
Capacity4500mAh5000mAhSamsung has slightly longer battery life.
Charging65W fast charging25W fast chargingOppo charges much faster, great for quickly topping up.
Battery FeaturesReverse ChargingNoneOppo can charge other devices wirelessly.
Camera
Main Camera50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56" (IMX766)50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56" (IMX766)Both have similar main sensor performance.
Selfie Camera32MP, f/2.4, 1/2.74" (IMX615)32MP, f/2.2, 1/2.8" (IMX616)Oppo has a slightly larger sensor but a smaller aperture.
Telephoto Lens13MP, f/2.4NoneOppo has an additional lens for optical zoom.
Wide-Angle Lens16MP, f/2.213MP, f/2.2, 1/3.1"Oppo has a slightly higher resolution but not sensor size.
Macro Lens2MP, f/2.4, 1/5"5MP, f/2.4Samsung's macro is higher resolution for more detailed close-ups.
Video4K@60fps, HDR, EIS4K@30fps, EISOppo offers higher frame rate 4K recording. A54 does not support HDR video.
DXOMark Mobile Score106107The A54 performs slightly better overall in camera testing.
DXOMark Photo Score104106A54 performs slightly better on still image quality.
DXOMark Video Score106115A54 performs significantly better in video quality.
Camera FeaturesOptical zoom, PDAF, CDAF, Dual shot2x2 OCL, Pro Video Mode, AutoFraming, All Pixel Omni- Directional PDAF, NPU AI Engine, DOL HDROppo offers optical zoom and focus; Samsung offers better video capture features.
Software
OSAndroid 11 (upgradable to 12)Android 13 (upgradable to 17)Samsung has a much newer OS with longer support.
Connectivity
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6Similar Wi-Fi performance.
Bluetooth5.15.3Samsung has a newer Bluetooth standard for potential improved connectivity with certain devices.
SIMDual Nano SIMDual Nano SIM / eSIMSamsung supports eSIM for easier switching between carriers.
Storage
Internal128/256 GB128/256 GBBoth offer the same storage options.
RAM12 GB6/8 GBOppo provides more RAM for smoother multitasking.
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone offers expandable storage.
Audio
Audio QualityStereo Speakers, Hi-ResStereo Speakers, Hi-Res, Dolby AtmosSamsung has enhanced audio quality features.
Security
FingerprintBasic SensorBasic SensorBoth have basic fingerprint sensors.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Find X3 Neo Advantages:

  • Stronger Performance: The Snapdragon 865 chipset provides significantly better performance for demanding apps and games, as supported by the higher Antutu score.
  • Faster Charging: 65W charging is much quicker than the A54's 25W, ideal for those on the go.
  • Brighter Display: 1100 nits brightness is superior for outdoor visibility, making it much better in direct sunlight.
  • Optical Zoom: The inclusion of a telephoto lens offers better zoom capabilities than the A54.
  • Reverse Charging: Ability to charge other devices is a convenient feature.
  • More RAM: 12GB of RAM versus the A54's 6/8GB allows for smoother multitasking and handles more intensive tasks better.

Samsung Galaxy A54 Advantages:

  • Newer Software: Android 13 with longer update support provides a more modern experience and access to new features for longer.
  • Better Video Quality: According to DXOmark, the video capabilities of the A54 is significantly better. The inclusion of features like OCL and NPU AI engine adds further enhancements.
  • Larger Battery: 5000 mAh battery provides slightly better battery endurance.
  • eSIM Support: Offers flexibility to switch carriers easily.
  • Better Audio: Dolby Atmos provides enhanced audio experience.
  • Macro Camera: A 5MP macro sensor allows for more detailed close-up shots.
  • Higher Refresh Rate: 120Hz display provides smoother animations than the 90Hz screen of the Oppo.

Trade-offs:

  • Oppo offers much faster charging and better daylight visibility, but at the cost of a older OS and weaker video recording.
  • Samsung offers longer software support and better video performance but sacrifices display brightness and charging speed.
  • Oppo is the better choice for performance, but the Samsung offers a better experience with video recording and audio.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Ideal User for Oppo Find X3 Neo:

  • Power Users: Individuals who prioritize performance for gaming and resource-intensive apps.
  • Frequent Travelers: Those who need quick charging and the ability to see their screen clearly in bright conditions.
  • Photo Enthusiasts (Zoom): Those who value optical zoom capabilities.

Use Cases for Oppo Find X3 Neo:

  • Playing graphics-intensive games with higher frame rates.
  • Editing videos and photos on the go.
  • Navigating and using phone outdoors in bright sunlight.
  • Quickly topping up the battery during short breaks.

Ideal User for Samsung Galaxy A54:

  • Multimedia Consumers: Individuals who frequently watch videos and listen to music and want good display and sound quality.
  • Software Focused: Those who want the latest Android experience and long-term software updates.
  • Video Creators: Those who prioritize video recording quality and video capture features.
  • Users who prefer modern features: Those who want modern features like eSIM and a 120Hz display.

Use Cases for Samsung Galaxy A54:

  • Watching movies and TV shows with enhanced audio and visual experience.
  • Capturing and editing videos for social media with the best video quality.
  • Using the latest Android features with long-term software support.
  • Switching between different carriers easily with eSIM support.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • The Oppo Find X3 Neo, while older, offers excellent performance at a potentially lower price point.
  • The Samsung Galaxy A54 provides good value for users who prefer newer features. The phone offers a better overall experience in video and is more up to date in terms of software, however, may not be priced as aggressively as the Oppo.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Do you prioritize performance and speed, or software and video features?
    • If performance and quick charging are crucial, the Oppo is the better choice.
    • If you want a more modern OS, long-term software updates, and better video recording capabilities, the Samsung is better suited.
  2. How often do you use your phone outdoors in bright sunlight?
    • If outdoor visibility is critical, the Oppo's brighter display is a significant advantage.
    • If this is not an important factor, the A54 will be suitable.
  3. Do you need a telephoto lens or better video capture features?
    • If you require a telephoto lens for optical zoom, the Oppo has the advantage.
    • If you record a lot of video and care about video quality, the A54's better video performance is preferable.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Performance and speed is of the utmost importance: Choose the Oppo Find X3 Neo.
  • Scenario 2: You heavily rely on your phone for video recording: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A54.
  • Scenario 3: You want a balance between solid performance and modern features: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A54.

My Choice

If I were to choose between these two phones, I would personally opt for the Samsung Galaxy A54. While the Oppo Find X3 Neo boasts impressive performance and faster charging, the Galaxy A54 offers a more compelling overall package for my needs. The longer software support, better video recording capabilities, larger battery, and more modern feature set, including the 120Hz display and eSIM support, make it a better long-term investment. Additionally, the slight improvement in audio quality and camera performance is enough to make it a more enjoyable phone to use on a daily basis. Although the Oppo is very strong in performance, I do not need the extra performance for my daily tasks as a regular phone user. I prefer to have more modern features, better video and audio and a phone with longer software updates and would gladly trade in the extra performance.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.