Oppo Find X3 Neo vs Samsung Galaxy A35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 19, 2021 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 92.74 cm³ 103.42 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.56 "/g 3.16 "/g
Weight 184 g 209 g
Height 159.9 mm 161.7 mm
Width 72.5 mm 78 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Galactic Silver
  • Starlight Black
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.55 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.3 % 84.8 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 1100 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.89 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.52 mAh/cm³ 48.34 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 650 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 12 18

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoSamsung Galaxy A35Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions159.9 x 72.5 x 8 mm161.7 x 78 x 8.2 mmA35 is slightly taller and wider, but both have similar thickness. Find X3 Neo is more pocketable and comfortable for smaller hands.
Weight184g209gFind X3 Neo is significantly lighter, making it more comfortable for prolonged use.
Display
Size6.55"6.6"Negligible difference, both offer ample screen real estate for media consumption and productivity.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2340Very similar, both offer sharp visuals for daily use.
Pixel Density402 PPI390 PPIBoth offer very similar sharpness; users won't notice any significant difference in clarity.
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks; great for media consumption.
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzA35 offers slightly smoother scrolling and animations.
Brightness1100 nits0 nitsFind X3 Neo provides significantly better outdoor visibility in bright sunlight. Samsung Galaxy A35's brightness is not available, making outdoor use difficult to assess.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 865 5G (7nm+)Exynos 1380 (5nm)Find X3 Neo has a faster chipset for better performance in demanding apps and games, but A35 has newer chip with improved power efficiency.
AnTuTu Score743,500578,500Find X3 Neo offers smoother performance, better for gaming.
GPUAdreno 650Mali-G68 MP5Find X3 Neo's GPU offers better graphics performance in demanding games.
Camera
Main Camera50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56", Sony IMX766, 1.0µm50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.96", Samsung GN8, 0.8µmFind X3 Neo's larger sensor captures more light, leading to better low-light performance and more detail.
Selfie Camera32MP, f/2.4, 1/2.74", Sony IMX615, 0.8µm13MP, f/2.2, 1.12µmFind X3 Neo offers higher resolution selfies, A35 has wider aperture for better low-light performance.
Telephoto Lens13MP, f/2.4, 1/3.4", Samsung S5K3M5, 1.0µmNoneFind X3 Neo offers dedicated zoom capabilities, while A35 relies on digital zoom.
Wide-Angle Lens16MP, f/2.28MP, f/2.2Find X3 Neo's wide-angle lens captures more detail in wide shots.
Macro Lens2MP, f/2.4, 1/5", GalaxyCore GC02M1, 1.75µm5MP, f/2.4, 1.12µmA35 offers slightly higher resolution for macro shots.
VideoUp to 4K@60fps with HDR, EISUp to 4K@30fps with EISFind X3 Neo offers slightly better video recording capabilities and framerate.
DxOMarkMain: 106, Photo: 104, Video: 106Main: 104, Photo: 107, Video: 110A35 is better for Video performance, while Find X3 Neo is slightly better overall for mobile performance
Battery
Capacity4500mAh5000mAhA35 offers longer battery life due to larger capacity.
Charging65W fast charging25W fast chargingFind X3 Neo charges much faster, reducing time plugged into an outlet.
FeaturesReverse chargingNoneFind X3 Neo can charge other devices wirelessly.
Software
OSAndroid 11 (upgradeable to 12)Android 14 (upgradeable to 18)A35 has newer software with more updates and features.
Storage
Internal Storage128GB or 256GB128GB or 256GBBoth offer ample storage, but neither are expandable.
RAM12GB6GB or 8GBFind X3 Neo has more RAM, better for heavy multitasking.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Find X3 Neo Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 865 chipset and Adreno 650 GPU offer faster app loading, smoother operation, and better gaming performance, with a higher benchmark score of 743,500 vs 578,500.
  • Faster Charging: 65W fast charging significantly reduces the time spent charging the phone.
  • Better Main Camera Sensor: The larger 1/1.56" sensor captures more light, resulting in better low-light performance and detail.
  • Telephoto Lens: Offers optical zoom capabilities for better zoomed photos, which A35 lacks.
  • Brighter Display: 1100 nits brightness provides superior outdoor visibility and a better experience in bright conditions.
  • More RAM: 12GB is better for multitasking than Samsung's 6GB or 8GB.
  • Reverse Wireless Charging: Allows the phone to charge other devices.

Samsung Galaxy A35 Advantages:

  • Newer Software: Runs Android 14, ensuring longer software support and access to the latest features, with upgrade path to Android 18.
  • Longer Battery Life: Larger 5000mAh battery provides longer usage time between charges.
  • Better Video Score: Higher DxOMark video score indicates better video quality.
  • More Up-to-date Bluetooth: Bluetooth 5.3 provides more features over Oppo's 5.1.
  • Better Screen Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass Victus offers superior screen protection from scratches and drops.
  • Wider Aperture Selfie Camera: f/2.2 offers slightly better low-light performance.
  • Slightly higher macro lens resolution: 5MP vs 2MP of the Oppo.
  • Dolby Atmos: For richer audio experience.

Trade-offs:

  • Oppo Find X3 Neo: Older software, lacks expandable storage, slower battery charging, no water/dust resistance, and may be harder to find as its older.
  • Samsung Galaxy A35: Slower chipset, weaker graphics performance, lacks a telephoto lens, lacks display brightness spec, lacks reverse wireless charging and lower charging speed.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Find X3 Neo is Ideal For:

  • Gamers: The superior chipset and GPU provide better gaming performance and smoother frame rates.
  • Power Users: The larger RAM and faster processor are beneficial for heavy multitasking and demanding applications.
  • Photography Enthusiasts: The larger sensor main camera and telephoto lens offer better image quality and zoom capabilities.
  • Outdoor Users: The 1100 nits brightness makes it easier to use the phone in bright sunlight conditions.
  • Users Needing Fast Charging: The 65W fast charging gets the battery back up quickly.

Specific Use Cases for Find X3 Neo:

  • Playing graphically intensive games at higher settings.
  • Editing videos on the go without significant lag.
  • Taking zoomed photos in good clarity, utilizing the optical zoom.
  • Using the phone outdoors in bright sunlight with good visibility.

Samsung Galaxy A35 is Ideal For:

  • Everyday Users: The A35 is great for social media, web browsing, and everyday tasks due to it's newer software.
  • Users wanting a better video camera: Higher video score means better performance in that category.
  • Users Seeking Longer Battery Life: The larger battery will last longer for users who prioritize battery endurance.
  • Users Wanting the Latest Software: Runs Android 14 out of the box.
  • Users Seeking Superior Screen Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass Victus provides added durability.
  • Audio enthusiasts: Dolby Atmos provides a richer audio experience.

Specific Use Cases for A35:

  • Using the phone as a daily driver for all typical tasks.
  • Watching videos and media for longer periods without worrying about the battery.
  • Having the latest Android features and security updates.
  • Wanting a more durable screen for daily use.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Do you prioritize performance (gaming, heavy apps) or battery life and software updates?
  2. Is camera quality or zoom capabilities more important to you?
  3. How important is screen visibility in bright sunlight and fast charging?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Performance and Camera Priority If you prioritize gaming, running heavy apps, or want a telephoto lens for better photos, the Oppo Find X3 Neo is the better choice.
  • Scenario 2: Battery Life and Latest Software Priority If you prioritize longer battery life, the latest software, and better screen protection, the Samsung Galaxy A35 is the better option.
  • Scenario 3: Mixed Usage with Budget Considerations: If you value performance and have a flexible budget, but don't mind the older software, the Find X3 Neo might be a better value. If you prioritize modern features and want a longer lasting battery and more up-to-date phone, the Galaxy A35 may be better

What I would choose and why!

I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A35. While the Oppo Find X3 Neo boasts superior processing power and camera features, the A35’s combination of newer software, longer battery life, and a more durable screen fits my daily needs better. While the Find X3 Neo is better on paper for camera and gaming, I prefer a more up-to-date and longer-lasting phone, and the A35's video camera performance is also a plus. The superior screen protection is a bonus for me. I am not a heavy gamer, so the raw power difference isn't as crucial. Also, given that the Oppo is an older model, finding one might be difficult and expensive compared to a newer Galaxy A35.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.