Oppo Find X3 Neo vs Samsung Galaxy A34 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 19, 2021 March 24, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 92.74 cm³ 103.3 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.56 "/g 3.32 "/g
Weight 184 g 199 g
Height 159.9 mm 161.3 mm
Width 72.5 mm 78.1 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Galactic Silver
  • Starlight Black
  • Silver
  • Violet
  • Graphite
  • Lime

Display

Screen Size 6.55 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.3 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 1100 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.89 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.52 mAh/cm³ 48.4 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 650 Mali-G68 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 12 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Here's a detailed comparison of the Oppo Find X3 Neo and Samsung Galaxy A34, focusing on real-world implications:

Design

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoSamsung Galaxy A34Practical Impact
Dimensions159.9 x 72.5 x 8 mm161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2 mmOppo is more compact, feels better in hand; A34 is taller and wider, slightly bulkier
Weight184g199gOppo is noticeably lighter, more comfortable for prolonged use
Build QualityCorning Gorilla Glass 5Screen protector (unknown)Oppo has better screen protection, more resistant to scratches and cracks

Display

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoSamsung Galaxy A34Practical Impact
Size6.55"6.6"Similar screen sizes, negligible difference
Resolution1080x24001080x2340Both offer sharp visuals, with minimal difference in pixel count.
PPI402390Both provide very similar pixel density; Sharpness is similar in practice
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth provide vibrant colors, deep blacks, and excellent contrast
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzSamsung has smoother scrolling and animations, a better experience for gaming/fast-paced content
Brightness1100 nits0 nitsOppo is significantly brighter; much better outdoor visibility in direct sunlight. No brightness specified for A34 making it hard to evaluate.

Performance

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoSamsung Galaxy A34Practical Impact
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+)Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm)Oppo has a more powerful chipset, better overall performance in demanding tasks
AnTuTu Score743,500532,300Oppo offers smoother multitasking, faster app loading, higher gaming performance
GPUAdreno 650Mali-G68 MC4Oppo's GPU handles graphics more efficiently, resulting in better gaming performance

Camera

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoSamsung Galaxy A34Practical Impact
Main Camera50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56" Sony IMX76648MP, f/1.8, 1/2" Sony IMX582Oppo's larger sensor captures more light, better low-light performance, detail
Selfie Camera32MP, f/2.4, 1/2.74" Sony IMX61513MP, f/2.2, 1/3.06" Sony IMX258Oppo has higher resolution, more detailed selfies; A34 has slightly wider aperture.
Telephoto Lens13MP, f/2.4, 1/3.4" Samsung S5K3M5Not AvailableOppo has dedicated zoom capabilities; captures more detail in zoomed shots
Wide Angle Lens16MP, f/2.2, sensor model unavailable5MP, f/2.2, Samsung S5K4HAOppo captures significantly more detail in wide-angle shots
Portrait (Depth)Not Available5MP, f/2.4, 1/5" GalaxyCore GC5035Samsung has dedicated depth sensor for better portrait mode
Macro Lens2MP, f/2.4, 1/5" GalaxyCore GC02M1Not AvailableOppo can capture close-up photos
VideoUp to 4K@60fps with HDR, EIS, 480fps slow-moUp to 4K@30fps, 480fps slow-moBoth record high-quality videos; Oppo has more frame rate options and HDR.
DxOMark ScoreMain 106, Photo 104, Video 106Main 92, Photo 99, Video 78Oppo has higher image quality; Superior video performance compared to the A34.

Battery

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoSamsung Galaxy A34Practical Impact
Capacity4500mAh5000mAhSamsung has a slightly larger battery, potentially longer battery life.
Charging65W Fast Charging25W Fast ChargingOppo charges significantly faster, reducing waiting time
FeaturesReverse ChargingNoneOppo can charge other devices wirelessly

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Find X3 Neo Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 865 offers significantly higher processing power and gaming capabilities.
  • Brighter Display: The 1100 nits brightness allows for much better outdoor visibility.
  • More Versatile Camera System: Features a telephoto lens, higher-resolution wide-angle and selfie cameras, a macro lens, and better video recording options.
  • Faster Charging: 65W charging significantly reduces charging times.
  • Reverse Charging: Ability to charge other devices.
  • Better Screen Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass 5 provides better resistance to scratches and damages.

Samsung Galaxy A34 Advantages:

  • Newer Operating System: Ships with Android 13, receives updates for longer.
  • Larger Battery: 5000 mAh offers potentially longer battery life.
  • Slightly Smoother Display: 120Hz refresh rate gives slightly smoother animations.
  • Dedicated Depth Sensor: A dedicated depth sensor improves the quality of portrait photos.
  • Newer Bluetooth Version: Bluetooth 5.3 allows for better connection and compatibility with newer devices.

Significant Trade-offs:

  • Oppo Find X3 Neo: Older OS, slightly smaller battery, larger in size compared to A34.
  • Samsung Galaxy A34: Lower processing power, weaker main and selfie camera performance, significantly lower brightness, slower charging speeds, and missing features like reverse charging and telephoto lens.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Find X3 Neo:

  • Ideal User: Power users, mobile gamers, photography enthusiasts, those who prioritize display brightness and fast charging.
  • Use Cases:
    • Intensive mobile gaming with demanding graphics
    • Capturing high-quality photos and videos in various conditions
    • Using the phone outdoors frequently
    • Those needing a phone that charges quickly
  • Price-to-Value: Offers excellent performance and camera capabilities, but the older OS could be a slight drawback.

Samsung Galaxy A34:

  • Ideal User: Everyday users, those who prioritize battery life, and longer software support, and want a bigger screen, while not requiring high-end performance and camera features.
  • Use Cases:
    • General daily use (social media, browsing, messaging)
    • Users who prioritize battery life for long days
    • Those who prefer the latest software updates
    • Casual photography with decent results.
  • Price-to-Value: Good value for general use with longer software support, but lags in performance, screen brightness, and camera compared to the Oppo.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Performance vs. Battery: Do you need top-tier performance for gaming and heavy tasks, or do you prioritize battery life?
  2. Camera Quality vs. Software Support: Is camera performance more important, or would you rather have a longer-supported device with the latest software?
  3. Display Brightness: Will you use your phone mostly indoors or outdoors in bright sunlight?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Mobile Gamer/Heavy User: Choose the Oppo Find X3 Neo for its superior processing power, better GPU, faster charging, and enhanced camera system. The trade-off is an older OS.
  • Scenario 2: Everyday User with Long Battery Needs: The Samsung Galaxy A34 is a good pick for everyday use with longer software support, bigger battery, and smoother display. However, its camera is not as good as the Oppo, the screen is less bright, and it's performance lags behind the Oppo.
  • Scenario 3: Photography Enthusiast: Choose the Oppo Find X3 Neo for the superior camera system with a telephoto lens, higher resolution wide and selfie cameras, and better video recording capabilities.

My Choice

If I were choosing between these two phones, I would personally opt for the Oppo Find X3 Neo. My reasoning is as follows:

  • Performance Matters: As someone who uses their phone for a variety of tasks, including gaming, video editing, and heavy multitasking, the Snapdragon 865 in the Oppo would provide a significantly smoother and faster experience. The Antutu scores clearly indicate a performance advantage that would translate into noticeable differences in daily use.
  • Display Quality is Key: The 1100 nits brightness is crucial for me as I often use my phone outdoors. The Samsung Galaxy A34 not having a specified value is a major disadvantage.
  • Camera Versatility: The Oppo's camera system, with its telephoto lens, higher resolution wide-angle and selfie cameras, and superior video recording options, is much more appealing for my use cases. I prefer a device that offers flexibility in my photography.
  • Fast Charging Convenience: I value the ability to charge my device quickly, so the Oppo’s 65W charging would be far more convenient than Samsung's 25W.

While the Samsung Galaxy A34 has the benefit of a newer operating system and a slightly larger battery, these benefits don't outweigh the Oppo's advantages in performance, camera, and display, which are key areas I prioritize in a smartphone. The Oppo, while slightly older, still holds a significant edge in the areas that matter most to me.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.