Oppo Find X3 Neo vs Samsung Galaxy A25 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 19, 2021 December 16, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 92.74 cm³ 102.23 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.56 "/g 3.3 "/g
Weight 184 g 197 g
Height 159.9 mm 161 mm
Width 72.5 mm 76.5 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Galactic Silver
  • Starlight Black
  • Brave Black
  • Optimistic Blue
  • Personality Yellow
  • Fantasy Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.55 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.3 % 84.2 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 1100 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.89 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.52 mAh/cm³ 48.91 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) Exynos 1280 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 650 Mali-G68

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 12 18

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Oppo Find X3 Neo vs. Samsung Galaxy A25

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoSamsung Galaxy A25Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions159.9 × 72.5 × 8 mm161 × 76.5 × 8.3 mmA25 is slightly larger and thicker; X3 Neo is more pocketable.
Weight184g197gX3 Neo is noticeably lighter; more comfortable for extended use.
Display
Size6.55"6.5"Negligible size difference in daily use.
Resolution1080x24001080x2340Both offer sharp visuals; minor difference not noticeable.
Pixel Density402 PPI396 PPIBoth displays are sharp; negligible difference.
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth deliver vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzA25 has smoother scrolling and animations.
Brightness1100 nits1000 nitsX3 Neo offers better visibility in bright sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 865 (7nm+)Exynos 1280 (5nm)X3 Neo chipset is faster for demanding apps/games, despite being older.
AnTuTu Score743,500480,688X3 Neo has significantly better performance for gaming and multitasking.
GPUAdreno 650Mali-G68X3 Neo’s GPU is better for high-end gaming and graphics.
Camera
Standard Camera50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56" sensor, Sony IMX76650MP, f/1.8, Sensor model not specifiedX3 Neo's sensor is larger and known to perform better in low light; A25 sensor details are missing.
Selfie Camera32MP, f/2.4, 1/2.74" sensor, Sony IMX61513MP, f/2.2, Sensor model not specifiedX3 Neo has a higher resolution sensor for sharper selfies, A25 has wider aperture for slightly better low light.
Telephoto Lens13MP, f/2.4, 1/3.4" sensorNot availableX3 Neo offers optical zoom capability for better zoomed photos.
Wide Angle Lens16MP, f/2.28MP, f/2.2X3 Neo takes wider and higher quality wide-angle shots.
Portrait ModeNot available2MP, f/2.4A25 has a dedicated depth sensor for portrait photos.
Macro Lens2MP, f/2.4Not availableX3 Neo allows for closeup macro shots.
Video4K@60fps, HDR, EIS4K@30fps, EISX3 Neo has higher video quality (60fps at 4k).
DxOMark (Mobile)Main: 106, Photo: 104, Video: 106Main: 92, Photo: 98, Video: 94X3 Neo has significantly better overall camera performance (especially video).
Battery
Capacity4500 mAh5000 mAhA25 has better battery life, providing longer usage between charges.
Charging65W Fast Charging25W Fast ChargingX3 Neo charges much faster, minimizing downtime.
FeaturesReverse chargingNot availableX3 Neo can act as a power bank for other devices.
Software
OSAndroid 11 (upgradable to 12)Android 14 (upgradable to 18)A25 comes with newer software, ensuring better feature and security support.
Connectivity
WiFiWi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)802.11acX3 Neo offers faster and more efficient Wi-Fi connections.
BluetoothBluetooth 5.1 LEBluetooth 5.3A25 offers a newer version of bluetooth with better energy efficiency.
Storage
RAM12 GB6/8 GBX3 Neo provides smoother multitasking, especially with memory intensive apps and games.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone allows for adding external storage.
Audio
AudioHi-Res Audio, Stereo SpeakersDolby Atmos, Stereo SpeakersX3 Neo supports higher resolution audio; A25 has a Dolby Atmos which delivers more immersive audio.
Security
Fingerprint SensorBasic fingerprint sensorSide-mounted fingerprint sensorA25 has a more convenient and advanced side-mounted sensor.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Find X3 Neo Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 865 chipset provides significantly better CPU and GPU performance, resulting in smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming.
  • Better Camera System: Larger sensor in the main camera, dedicated telephoto lens, and superior video recording capabilities. Higher DxOMark scores confirm superior overall image quality.
  • Faster Charging: 65W fast charging reduces charging time significantly, more convenient for on-the-go users.
  • Reverse Charging: Can act as a power bank for other devices, adding convenience.
  • Better Display Brightness: 100 Nits brighter for better visibility under bright sunlight.
  • Wi-Fi 6: Offers faster and more efficient Wi-Fi than A25's older 802.11ac.
  • More RAM: Comes with 12 GB of ram vs A25's 6/8GB, leading to better performance.

Samsung Galaxy A25 Advantages:

  • Newer Software: Comes with Android 14, guaranteeing longer software support and newer features.
  • Larger Battery: 5000mAh battery offers longer battery life for users who prioritize endurance.
  • Newer Bluetooth: Bluetooth 5.3 offers better energy efficiency and newer features.
  • Side-mounted Fingerprint Sensor: More convenient and faster unlocking compared to older fingerprint sensor on X3 Neo.
  • Depth Sensor for Portraits: Dedicated depth sensor for portrait mode.
  • Dolby Atmos Support: More immersive sound experience
  • More Affordable: Typically, devices in the A series are more affordable than X series devices.

Significant Trade-offs:

  • Oppo Find X3 Neo: Older software (Android 11), and slightly smaller battery.
  • Samsung Galaxy A25: Significantly weaker performance in CPU, GPU, and overall camera performance, slower charging speed.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Find X3 Neo Ideal User:

  • Power Users: Those who need top-tier performance for gaming, video editing, and heavy multitasking.
  • Photography Enthusiasts: Users who value camera quality and versatility (telephoto lens and better main sensor).
  • On-the-Go Professionals: Those who need fast charging and a reliable device with strong performance.
  • Users Who Prefer Performance Over Newer Software: Prefer performance over the latest version of Android.

Specific Use Cases:

  • Playing high-end games with demanding graphics.
  • Capturing high-quality photos and videos for social media or work.
  • Quickly charging the phone between meetings and travel.
  • Using the phone for intensive tasks, such as video editing and data analysis.

Samsung Galaxy A25 Ideal User:

  • Budget-Conscious Users: Those seeking a reliable smartphone with essential features at a more affordable price.
  • Average Users: Individuals who primarily use their phones for social media, web browsing, and basic applications.
  • Users Who Prioritize Battery Life: Those who need a long-lasting battery for all-day usage.
  • Users Who Prioritize the Latest Android: Users who prefer having the latest android version and features.

Specific Use Cases:

  • Daily social media browsing and communication.
  • Watching videos and streaming content.
  • Taking casual photos and videos.
  • Longer battery life during work hours or travel.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • Oppo Find X3 Neo: Offers a premium experience with high performance and a better camera, but may come at a higher price.
  • Samsung Galaxy A25: Provides a balanced experience with good battery life and a more affordable price point, but is less performant.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Performance Needs: How important is smooth, fast performance for your typical usage (gaming, heavy apps, etc.)?
  2. Camera Priorities: How much do you prioritize camera quality, versatility, and video recording?
  3. Battery and Charging: Do you need the longest battery life, or do you prefer fast charging for quick top-ups?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1 (Gaming/Power User): If you prioritize performance, gaming, and camera versatility, the Oppo Find X3 Neo is the clear choice, despite the older OS.
  • Scenario 2 (General Use/Budget): If you seek a reliable, affordable smartphone with good battery life and don't require top-end performance, the Samsung Galaxy A25 is the better option.
  • Scenario 3 (Multimedia/Camera): If you enjoy taking photos and videos with a wide range of options, the Oppo Find X3 Neo will offer much better capabilities.

My Choice

If I were to choose, I would pick the Oppo Find X3 Neo.

Reasoning:

My primary need is for performance and camera versatility. While the Samsung Galaxy A25 offers a newer OS and longer battery life, the X3 Neo's significantly better CPU, GPU, and camera system are more important for my daily use which involves gaming, photo editing, and multitasking with several demanding apps. I am also willing to sacrifice a bit of battery life for faster charging speeds, which the X3 Neo provides. The higher DxOMark scores and the addition of a telephoto lens are also very important for my photo needs. The older software is a trade-off I'm willing to accept considering that the device is still upgradable to Android 12. While price is a factor, the performance and camera improvements of the Oppo Find X3 Neo make it worth the investment for my use case.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.