Smartphone Comparison: Oppo Find X3 Neo vs. Motorola Razr 50
1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Oppo Find X3 Neo | Motorola Razr 50 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Form Factor | Standard | Foldable | Razr 50 is foldable, offering a smaller form factor when closed and a larger display when open; X3 Neo is traditional. |
| Dimensions | 159.9 × 72.5 × 8 mm | 171.3 × 74 × 7.3 mm | Razr 50 is taller and slightly wider but thinner when unfolded; X3 Neo is more compact when in use. |
| Weight | 184g | 188.4g | Both phones are similar in weight; differences are negligible. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.55" | 6.9" | Razr 50 has a larger display, better for media consumption and multitasking, while X3 Neo is slightly smaller and may be more pocketable. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2640 | Razr 50 has a slightly sharper display but the difference is unlikely to be noticeable in daily use. |
| PPI | 402 | 413 | Both phones have very similar pixel densities, resulting in sharp images. |
| Technology | AMOLED | Unspecified | X3 Neo offers superior display technology with deeper blacks, higher contrast, and better power efficiency for dark themes, more vibrant colors (Razr 50 display type is unknown). |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 120Hz | Razr 50 provides slightly smoother scrolling and animations, but the difference may not be significant to all users. |
| Brightness | 1100 nits | 3000 nits | Razr 50 has much higher brightness, offering significantly better visibility in direct sunlight. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Mediatek Dimensity 7300X (4 nm) | X3 Neo’s older flagship chipset has slightly better benchmark scores, while Razr 50 is more power-efficient due to its smaller fabrication process. |
| AnTuTu Score | 743,500 | 620,395 | X3 Neo offers slightly better overall performance according to AnTuTu scores. |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Mali-G615 MC2 | X3 Neo's Adreno 650 is slightly better for gaming performance, however it is only marginal and both GPU's are modern and capable. |
| Camera | |||
| Standard | 50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56" Sony IMX766 | 50MP, f/1.8, Unspecified | X3 Neo has a larger sensor, potentially resulting in better low-light performance; Razr 50's sensor is unknown so its performance cannot be verified. |
| Selfie | 32MP, f/2.4, 1/2.74" Sony IMX615 | 32MP, f/2.4, Unspecified | Both phones have very similar front cameras with unknown sensors in Razr 50. |
| Telephoto | 13MP, f/2.4, 1/3.4" Samsung S5K3M5 | None | X3 Neo includes a telephoto lens for optical zoom capabilities, missing on Razr 50. |
| Wide Angle | 16MP, f/2.2 | 13MP, f/2.2 | X3 Neo has a higher resolution wide-angle lens for slightly more detail. |
| Macro | 2MP, f/2.4, 1/5" GalaxyCore GC02M1 | None | X3 Neo includes a dedicated macro lens for close-up photography. |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps with HDR/EIS | 4K@30fps with EIS | X3 Neo offers more video recording options (60fps) compared to Razr 50, both with video stabilization. |
| DxOMark Mobile Score | 106 | 92 | X3 Neo performs better overall in photo and video tests according to DxOMark |
| Camera Features | Extensive | Extensive | Both have comprehensive features, but X3 Neo has optical zoom, quadruple camera, contrast detection autofocus, dual shot; Razr 50 has time-lapse, laser autofocus, and RAW. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 4500mAh | 4200mAh | X3 Neo has a slightly larger battery, potentially offering marginally longer battery life, but may not be noticeable. |
| Charging | 65W Fast Charging | 30W Fast Charging | X3 Neo charges much faster, reducing the time spent waiting. |
| Features | Reverse charging | Reverse, Wireless 15W charging | Razr 50 offers wireless charging, which X3 Neo lacks, both have reverse charging. |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11 (upgradable to 12) | Android 14 | Razr 50 ships with a newer Android version, offering the latest features and security updates; X3 Neo is one major Android version behind. |
| Connectivity | |||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E | Razr 50 supports Wi-Fi 6E, providing faster speeds and lower latency; access to the 6 GHz band, reduced interference |
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX, LDAC, SBC, AAC | 5.3, A2DP, LE | Razr 50 has a newer Bluetooth version and doesn't have advanced audio codecs, X3 Neo has advanced audio codecs. |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, SUPL, Galileo | X3 Neo supports more satellite systems for slightly better location accuracy, while Razr 50 supports SUPL. |
| SIM | Dual Nano SIM | Dual Nano SIM/eSIM | Razr 50 offers eSIM support for added flexibility, X3 Neo uses two Nano SIM's. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal | 128 GB / 256 GB | 256 GB / 512 GB | Razr 50 offers more storage options (256 GB or 512 GB) compared to X3 Neo (128 GB or 256 GB). |
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB or 12 GB | Both phones come in a 12GB RAM configuration; Razr 50 has an 8GB option, potentially impacting performance for some users. |
| Expandable | No | No | Neither phone offers expandable storage. |
| Audio | |||
| Quality | Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 3 microphones | Razr 50 has a slight edge in audio quality with Dolby Atmos and an additional microphone for better voice capture, X3 Neo has Hi-Res Audio. |
| Security | |||
| Features | Basic fingerprint sensor | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor | Razr 50 features a side-mounted sensor, which is generally considered more reliable and convenient than the basic sensor. |
| Build Quality | |||
| Screen Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Razr 50 has superior scratch and shatter resistance with Victus Glass. |
| Sensors | |||
| Sensors | Biometric, Proximity, Motion, Pedometer | Biometric, Proximity, Motion | Both phones feature a comprehensive suite of sensors for various applications and use cases, X3 Neo has an additional pedometer. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Oppo Find X3 Neo Advantages:
- Stronger Performance: Slightly higher benchmark scores (AnTuTu) indicating marginally better processing power.
- Superior Camera System: Telephoto and Macro lenses for versatile photography, as well as a larger standard sensor. Higher DxOMark score indicates superior photo and video quality.
- Faster Charging: 65W charging allows for significantly faster battery replenishment.
- Better audio codecs: Bluetooth audio codecs such as APT-x, LDAC, SBC, AAC allow for higher-quality audio streaming
Motorola Razr 50 Advantages:
- Foldable Design: Offers a unique form factor, pocketability, and a large display when unfolded, making it a more flexible option for use cases.
- Significantly Brighter Display: Much higher brightness (3000 nits) for vastly improved outdoor visibility.
- Newer OS: Ships with Android 14, providing access to the latest features and security patches.
- Wi-Fi 6E: Supports Wi-Fi 6E for better performance on compatible networks.
- Wireless Charging: Includes 15W wireless charging for added convenience.
- eSIM Support: Offers eSIM support for easier digital carrier switching.
- Advanced screen protection: Corning Gorilla Glass Victus offers superior screen protection.
- Improved audio quality: Dolby Atmos enhances audio immersion, coupled with 3 microphones for clearer voice capture.
Trade-offs:
- The Oppo Find X3 Neo sacrifices the modern and unique form factor of the Razr 50 for a more traditional design.
- The Razr 50 sacrifices some camera versatility for its more modern features like wireless charging and a brighter display.
- The Razr 50 is marginally heavier, wider and taller than the X3 Neo, despite its foldability.
- The Oppo Find X3 Neo has a slightly smaller battery but can charge faster.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Oppo Find X3 Neo is Ideal For:
- Photography enthusiasts: Users who prioritize versatile camera capabilities (telephoto, macro, higher resolution on wide angle)
- Performance-focused users: Those who prioritize gaming and heavy multitasking, the higher AnTuTu score will provide smoother performance.
- Users who value charging speed: Prefer a device that can quickly regain battery power via 65W fast charging.
- Users who prefer high quality audio over wireless charging: Prioritizing high-resolution audio formats through bluetooth.
Motorola Razr 50 is Ideal For:
- Tech enthusiasts: Those who appreciate innovative foldable designs.
- Outdoor users: Those who need excellent screen visibility in bright sunlight.
- Users who prefer up-to-date software: Those who want the latest Android features and security.
- Users who value convenience: Those who prefer wireless charging and eSIM capabilities, better side mounted fingerprint sensor.
- Users who value audio quality: Those who seek better audio performance with Dolby Atmos and a dedicated 3 microphone setup.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- What is your priority, a traditional phone with strong cameras or an innovative foldable design?
- How important is outdoor screen visibility to you?
- Are you more concerned with a faster charging speed or wireless charging?
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Photography is Key: If you are a user that prioritizes high quality and versatility in photography, the Oppo Find X3 Neo with its telephoto lens, macro lens, larger sensor and better DxOMark scores.
- Scenario 2: Outdoor Visibility is Crucial: If you frequently use your phone in direct sunlight, the Motorola Razr 50's significantly brighter display makes it a better option.
- Scenario 3: Tech Innovator: If you are drawn to cutting edge technology and desire a foldable phone with modern features, choose the Motorola Razr 50.
- Scenario 4: Performance Gamer: If you desire the highest performance, and less concerned with the advantages of a foldable phone, the Oppo Find X3 Neo offers a higher Antutu benchmark.
My Choice
If I were to choose between these two phones, I would select the Motorola Razr 50. While the Oppo Find X3 Neo offers a robust camera system and stronger performance on paper, the Razr 50's innovative foldable design and practical upgrades in display technology and wireless charging are more appealing to me. My usage often involves outdoor scenarios where the higher brightness is crucial, and the convenience of wireless charging is a welcome addition. While I'd miss the Telephoto lens, the modern features and improved screen protection would outweigh the camera and performance trade-offs. The Razr 50 simply offers a more modern and versatile user experience.
