Oppo Find X3 Neo vs Motorola Moto G71 5G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 19, 2021 January 19, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 92.74 cm³ 101.26 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.56 "/g 3.58 "/g
Weight 184 g 179 g
Height 159.9 mm 161.2 mm
Width 72.5 mm 73.9 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Galactic Silver
  • Starlight Black
  • Neptune Green
  • Arctic Blue
  • Iron Black

Display

Screen Size 6.55 " 6.4 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.3 % 83 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 411 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1100 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.89 mAh/in² 122.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.52 mAh/cm³ 49.38 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)
GPU Adreno 650 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 11
Maximum OS Version 12 12

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoMotorola Moto G71 5GPractical Impact
Design
Launch Date2021-03-192022-01-19Motorola is newer by 10 months, potentially better long term software support
Dimensions159.9 × 72.5 × 8 mm161.2 × 73.9 × 8.5 mmMotorola is slightly taller, wider, and thicker, slightly less pocketable
Weight184g179gMotorola is slightly lighter (5g), not very noticeable
Display
Size6.55"6.4"Oppo has slightly larger screen, better for media consumption and multitasking
Resolution1080x24001080x2400Both are equally sharp, detail is similar
PPI402411Similar pixel density, indistinguishable sharpness to the human eye
TechnologyAMOLEDAMOLEDBoth have vibrant colors and deep blacks
Refresh Rate90Hz60HzOppo is smoother when navigating and gaming
Brightness1100 nits0 nitsOppo is much better in direct sunlight, more readable outdoors, Motorola's brightness spec is missing
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 865 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5GOppo has a much faster processor, noticeably better performance in apps and games
AnTuTu Score743,500396,564Oppo performs almost twice as fast, smoother experience with demanding tasks
GPUAdreno 650Adreno 619Oppo has better graphics, smoother gaming performance
Battery
Capacity4500mAh5000mAhMotorola will likely last longer on a single charge
Charging65W fast charging33W fast chargingOppo charges much faster, less time plugged into the wall
FeaturesReverse ChargingNoneOppo can charge other devices, potentially handy
Camera
Standard Camera50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56" sensor (Sony IMX766)50MP, f/1.8, 1/2.76" sensor (Samsung S5KJN1)Oppo has larger sensor, better low-light performance and image quality
Selfie Camera32MP, f/2.4, 1/2.74" sensor (Sony IMX615)16MP, f/2.2, 1.0µm pixelOppo has higher resolution, Motorola's wider aperture lets more light in
Telephoto Lens13MP, f/2.4NoneOppo has optical zoom, better for zoomed photos
Wide Angle Lens16MP, f/2.28MP, f/2.2Oppo has better wide-angle resolution for more detail
Macro Lens2MP, f/2.42MP, f/2.4Similar macro performance
VideoUp to 4K@60fps, HDR, EISUp to 1080p@60fpsOppo offers higher resolution and better stabilization
DXOMark106 (Mobile)Not TestedOppo's camera quality is rated as significantly better
Features4K Video, OIS, Quadruple Camera,Triple Camera, LAF, RAWOppo has better camera hardware, Motorola has RAW support for advanced editing
Software
OSAndroid 11 (upgradable to 12)Android 12Motorola has a slightly newer version of Android out of the box
Connectivity
WiFiWiFi 6802.11acOppo has faster WiFi, better performance in crowded networks
Bluetooth5.15.0Oppo has a slightly newer version, potentially better connection stability and power efficiency
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, SUPL, GalileoOppo has QZSS, Motorola has SUPL, both offer similar location accuracy
SIMDual SIMDual SIMBoth support Dual SIM functionality
Storage
Internal128GB or 256GB128GBOppo has optional higher storage, more space for files
RAM12GB6GB or 8GBOppo has more RAM, better for multitasking and heavy apps
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone allows for expandable storage
Audio
QualityHi-Res Audio, Stereo SpeakersDolby Atmos, 2 MicrophonesOppo offers better quality audio playback, Motorola offers richer audio output (from headphones) and potentially better voice input
Security
FeaturesIn-display fingerprint sensorRear-mounted fingerprint sensorBoth offer reliable biometric security
Build Quality
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5UnknownOppo's screen has better protection against scratches and cracks
Sensors
SensorsAccelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Proximity, FingerprintAccelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Fingerprint, Hall SensorOppo offers a compass, Motorola offers a hall sensor

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Find X3 Neo Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 865 chipset provides significantly faster processing speeds, making it better for demanding games and multitasking.
  • Enhanced Display: 90Hz refresh rate offers smoother animations and transitions, and 1100 nits of brightness make it much more usable outdoors.
  • Better Camera System: Larger sensor and more advanced lens setup leads to better photo and video quality, especially in low-light situations and when using the zoom function.
  • Faster Charging: 65W charging is significantly faster than 33W, reducing charging time.
  • Additional Features: Reverse charging, stereo speakers, Hi-Res Audio, WiFi 6, better screen protection, compass sensor.

Motorola Moto G71 5G Advantages:

  • Longer Battery Life: The 5000mAh battery will likely last longer on a single charge compared to the Oppo's 4500mAh.
  • Slightly Newer Software: The phone ships with a slightly newer version of Android.
  • Potentially Lower Price: Motorola phones are often priced more aggressively, potentially offering a better value for budget-conscious buyers.
  • Wider Aperture on Selfie Camera: The f/2.2 aperture captures more light, potentially resulting in better performance in low-light scenarios.
  • Dolby Atmos and 2 Microphones: The Dolby Atmos support offers richer audio output (from headphones) and the second mic helps with better voice input.

Trade-offs:

  • Oppo: While powerful, the battery life may be shorter than the Motorola, and it is an older device compared to the G71 5G, so the initial software version is older.
  • Motorola: Sacrifices performance, display quality and camera capabilities to achieve longer battery and a potentially lower price point.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Find X3 Neo is ideal for:

  • Power Users: Those who need a phone for demanding tasks such as gaming, video editing, or heavy multitasking.
  • Photography Enthusiasts: Users who prioritize camera quality and versatility for photos and videos, especially in low light.
  • Outdoor Users: Those who frequently use their phone in bright sunlight and need a highly visible screen.
  • Media Consumers: Those who watch a lot of videos and benefit from a higher refresh rate screen and better audio.

Motorola Moto G71 5G is ideal for:

  • Budget-Conscious Users: Those who are looking for a good value phone at a lower price point.
  • Battery Life Prioritizers: Users who prioritize long battery life and less frequent charging.
  • Basic Users: Those who primarily use their phone for basic tasks such as calling, texting, and social media.
  • Audio Focused Users: Those who value better quality audio output (from headphones) and voice input.

Specific Use Cases:

  • Oppo: Mobile gaming, capturing high-quality videos, editing photos/videos, outdoor navigation, intensive app usage, high fidelity audio listening through speakers.
  • Motorola: All day use without frequent charging, listening to music with headphones, voice calls, social media browsing.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is performance for you? (Gaming, multitasking)
  2. What is more important - camera quality or battery life? (Photography, all-day use)
  3. How much is the budget? (Price to value)

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: High Performance & Camera is a must: If you prioritize performance, higher refresh rate display, and camera quality above all else, then the Oppo Find X3 Neo is the better option.
  • Scenario 2: Battery Life is Critical: If you need all-day battery life and are comfortable with a less powerful processor and camera, the Motorola Moto G71 5G is the better choice.
  • Scenario 3: Budget-Conscious: If you want the best balance of price and basic features, the Motorola Moto G71 5G is likely the more budget-friendly option, but at the expense of performance and other features.

My Choice

If I were choosing between these two phones, I would personally opt for the Oppo Find X3 Neo. The significantly better performance, superior display quality with 90Hz refresh rate and higher brightness, and the much better camera system are factors that are more valuable to me. Although the battery life might be a bit less than the Moto G71, I am willing to compromise a bit on that front since the fast charging capability of the Oppo can easily make up for it. I also prefer the build quality and extra features such as stereo speakers and Hi-Res audio, making it a more suitable overall device for my needs.

While the Motorola Moto G71 5G offers a longer battery life and potentially lower price, I believe the Oppo Find X3 Neo's advantages in performance, display, and camera make it a worthwhile investment, especially if you're willing to spend the additional money. The benefits from those features will outweigh the lower battery life of the Oppo for my usage scenarios, thus making it my personal preference.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.