Smartphone Comparison: Oppo Find X3 Neo vs. Motorola Moto G51 5G
1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Oppo Find X3 Neo | Motorola Moto G51 5G | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 159.9 × 72.5 × 8 mm | 170.5 × 76.5 × 9.1 mm | Oppo is more compact and pocketable; Motorola is larger and may be less comfortable for small hands. |
| Weight | 184g | 208g | Oppo is significantly lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.55" | 6.8" | Motorola has a slightly larger screen, better for media consumption; Oppo is more compact. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | Both offer similar sharpness. |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 402 | 387 | Both have very similar pixel density, resulting in indistinguishable sharpness for most users. |
| Technology | AMOLED | IPS LCD | Oppo’s AMOLED has superior contrast, deeper blacks, vibrant colors, and better power efficiency with dark mode; Motorola has a more typical LCD screen. |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 120Hz | Motorola's 120Hz provides smoother scrolling and animations; Oppo's 90Hz is still smooth. |
| Brightness | 1100 nits | 0 nits | Oppo is much better for outdoor visibility; Motorola's brightness is not specified and likely lower, making outdoor use more difficult. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) | Oppo has a much faster flagship-level chipset; Motorola has a mid-range chipset. This affects app loading, multitasking, and gaming performance drastically. |
| AnTuTu Score | 743,500 | 381,000 | Oppo provides significantly better performance for demanding tasks like gaming. |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 619 | Oppo's GPU offers a smoother and better gaming experience than Motorola. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 4500mAh | 5000mAh | Motorola may have longer battery life due to larger capacity. |
| Charging | 65W Fast Charging | 10W Fast Charging | Oppo charges significantly faster, minimizing downtime; Motorola is much slower to charge. |
| Features | Reverse Charging, Non-removable | Non-removable | Oppo can charge other devices wirelessly; both have non-removable batteries. |
| Camera | |||
| Standard Lens | 50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56", Sony IMX766 | 50MP, f/1.8, 1/2.76", Samsung S5KJN1 | Oppo has a larger sensor (1/1.56" vs 1/2.76"), likely leading to better low-light performance. |
| Selfie Lens | 32MP, f/2.4, 1/2.74", Sony IMX615 | 13MP, f/2.2 | Oppo offers higher resolution selfies; Motorola has a slightly wider aperture. |
| Telephoto Lens | 13MP, f/2.4, 1/3.4", Samsung S5K3M5 | None | Oppo has a dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom; Motorola has no telephoto lens. |
| Wide Angle Lens | 16MP, f/2.2 | 8MP | Oppo has a higher resolution wide-angle lens. |
| Macro Lens | 2MP, f/2.4, 1/5" | 2MP | Both have basic macro lenses. |
| Video | 4K@60fps, EIS, HDR | 1080p@240fps | Oppo offers significantly higher video recording quality with 4K and HDR; Motorola is limited to 1080p. |
| DxOMark | 106 | N/A | Oppo has a solid DxOMark score, showing good camera performance; Motorola camera is not rated by DxOMark. |
| Features | OIS, Digital Zoom, Optical Zoom, HDR | PDAF, HDR, RAW, LAF | Oppo offers optical image stabilization (OIS) for better stability, more zoom options; Motorola has Laser Autofocus (LAF) and RAW capture. |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 11 (upgradeable to 12) | Android 12 | Motorola comes with the latest Android version; Both have similar software experience but with OEM customization. |
| Connectivity | |||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6, MIMO | Wi-Fi ac | Oppo has newer Wi-Fi standard with higher speeds, lower latency, and better multi-device performance. |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.1 LE, AptX, LDAC | Bluetooth 5.1 LE | Oppo offers higher quality audio codecs; Both have low-energy Bluetooth 5.1. |
| GPS | GPS, QZSS | GPS, SUPL | Oppo offers slightly better location accuracy due to QZSS; Motorola offers SUPL for quicker assisted location fixes. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal Storage | 128/256 GB | 64/128 GB | Oppo offers more storage in the higher tier option; both have non-expandable storage. |
| RAM | 12 GB | 4/8 GB | Oppo offers considerably more RAM for smooth multitasking. |
| Audio | |||
| Quality | Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers | Dolby Atmos, 2 Microphones | Oppo offers better audio playback; Motorola has enhanced surround and dual microphones for calls. |
| Security | |||
| Features | Basic Fingerprint | Side-mounted Fingerprint | Motorola has a slightly faster fingerprint sensor, while Oppo sensor performance may vary. |
| Build | |||
| Protection | Gorilla Glass 5 | Unknown | Oppo has a more resistant screen against scratches and bumps. |
| Sensors | |||
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, | Accelerometer, Gyroscope | Oppo has more advanced sensors for AR/VR, games, and fitness apps; Motorola has fewer. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Oppo Find X3 Neo Advantages:
- Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 865 chipset offers significantly faster processing, better multitasking, and smoother gaming experiences.
- Better Display: The AMOLED display with higher brightness, provides superior contrast, color vibrancy, and outdoor visibility.
- Advanced Camera System: The telephoto lens, higher resolution standard and wide-angle lenses, 4K video, OIS, and a high DxOMark score makes it a much better camera.
- Faster Charging: 65W fast charging drastically reduces charging times.
- More RAM & Storage Options: 12GB RAM and up to 256GB internal storage provide better multitasking and more space.
- Better Audio Playback: Features Stereo Speakers and Hi-Res Audio.
- Advanced Connectivity: Supports faster WiFi 6 and includes MIMO
- Build Quality: Corning Gorilla Glass 5 for superior screen protection
Motorola Moto G51 5G Advantages:
- Larger Battery: 5000 mAh battery might offer slightly longer battery life in some scenarios.
- Smoother Display: 120Hz refresh rate offers slightly smoother scrolling and animations.
- Latest Android Version: Ships with Android 12.
- Lower Price: Typically more budget-friendly, making it accessible to more price conscious buyers.
- Side Mounted Fingerprint Sensor: Potentially slightly better than the Oppo’s fingerprint sensor.
- Laser Autofocus: Provides faster focusing capabilities.
- Dolby Atmos and dual microphones: This is great for immersive audio and better call quality.
Trade-offs:
- The Oppo Find X3 Neo sacrifices some battery capacity and potentially slightly inferior refresh rate for significantly better performance and camera system.
- The Motorola Moto G51 5G trades raw performance, display quality, and camera capabilities for better battery and a slightly smoother refresh rate, at a lower price.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Oppo Find X3 Neo Ideal Users:
- Power Users: Individuals who need top-tier performance for demanding tasks such as gaming, video editing, and multitasking.
- Photography Enthusiasts: Users who prioritize a versatile camera system with high image and video quality.
- Multimedia Lovers: Users who appreciate high-quality displays with vibrant colors and deep blacks.
- Those needing fast charging: Individuals who need their devices charged fast to reduce downtime.
- Users who use their phones outside frequently: Due to the high brightness display.
Use Cases:
- Playing graphically intensive games at high settings.
- Capturing high-quality photos and videos in various conditions.
- Enjoying multimedia content with excellent display quality.
- Multi-tasking with multiple apps simultaneously without lag.
Motorola Moto G51 5G Ideal Users:
- Budget-Conscious Buyers: Users who need a reliable smartphone with a good battery life at a more accessible price.
- Casual Gamers: Individuals who play less demanding games and prioritize battery life.
- Everyday Users: People who need a phone for basic tasks like browsing, social media, and communication.
- Users who listen through their phone speakers: Due to Dolby Atmos.
Use Cases:
- Basic browsing, social media, and messaging.
- Playing casual mobile games.
- Watching videos and streaming content.
- Extended battery use.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- Performance Needs: Do you need top-tier performance for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, or are basic tasks and casual gaming sufficient?
- Camera Importance: How important is high-quality photography and videography? Do you need features like a telephoto lens and optical image stabilization?
- Budget: What's your price limit? Is it worth spending more for better performance and camera or is saving money more of a priority.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Performance & Camera Priority: If you prioritize top-tier performance and a great camera, the Oppo Find X3 Neo is the clear choice.
- Scenario 2: Budget-Conscious & Battery Priority: If you need a reliable phone with good battery life on a budget and a smooth display is a big bonus, the Motorola Moto G51 5G is the better option.
- Scenario 3: Balanced Use: If you need a good all around phone and do not need the fastest performance, the Motorola might be better, however if you want a better camera, and better overall user experience, the Oppo is still the better choice.
My Choice
I would choose the Oppo Find X3 Neo.
The primary reason for this is the vastly superior performance offered by the Snapdragon 865 chipset. As someone who regularly uses their phone for a variety of tasks, including mobile gaming, video editing, and general multitasking, the performance advantage of the Oppo Find X3 Neo is too substantial to ignore. While the Motorola Moto G51 5G does offer a smoother display refresh rate and a larger battery, these benefits are outweighed by the performance and camera improvements in the Oppo. The superior display quality of the AMOLED panel is also a significant factor for me, as I highly value picture quality, especially when consuming multimedia content. Moreover, the faster charging means less downtime.
While the price of the Oppo may be higher, the improvement in overall user experience is worth the investment. The Motorola Moto G51 5G would be fine for a user with a lower budget or simpler needs, but for me, the Oppo is a better overall phone.
