Oppo Find X3 Neo vs Motorola Moto G14 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 19, 2021 August 8, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 92.74 cm³ 95.35 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.56 "/g 3.67 "/g
Weight 184 g 177 g
Height 159.9 mm 161.5 mm
Width 72.5 mm 73.8 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Galactic Silver
  • Starlight Black
  • Sky Blue
  • Steel Gray
  • Butter Cream
  • Pale Lilac

Display

Screen Size 6.55 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.3 % 85.6 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 405 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1100 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.89 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.52 mAh/cm³ 52.44 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) Unisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 650 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 12

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoMotorola Moto G14Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions159.9 × 72.5 × 8 mm161.5 × 73.8 × 8 mmMotorola is slightly taller and wider, may feel less compact.
Weight184g177gMotorola is lighter, potentially more comfortable for long use.
Display
Size6.55"6.5"Virtually identical screen sizes.
Resolution1080x24001080x2400Both offer the same level of sharpness.
PPI402405Similar pixel density, comparable sharpness.
TechnologyAMOLEDIPS LCDOppo's AMOLED offers superior contrast, deeper blacks, and more vibrant colors, and better outdoor visibility due to brightness.
Refresh Rate90Hz60HzOppo's 90Hz provides smoother scrolling and animations.
Brightness1100 nits0 nitsOppo's higher brightness means significantly better outdoor visibility in sunlight. Motorola G14 brightness is not specified.
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+)Unisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm)Oppo has a much more powerful processor, leading to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming.
AnTuTu Score743,500220,000Oppo offers far better overall performance, feeling much snappier.
GPUAdreno 650Mali-G57 MP1Oppo's GPU offers significantly better graphics performance, especially for gaming.
Camera
Main Camera Resolution50MP50MPSimilar resolution, but sensor size is different.
Main Camera Sensor Size1/1.56"1/2.76"Oppo's larger sensor captures more light, resulting in better low-light photos.
Main Camera Sensor ModelSony IMX766Samsung S5KJN1Different sensors, Oppo's generally better in image quality
Selfie Camera Resolution32MP8MPOppo's selfie camera captures much more detail.
Selfie Camera Aperturef/2.4f/2.0Motorola's wider aperture allows more light in, potentially better low-light selfies.
Telephoto Lens13MP (f/2.4)NoneOppo can zoom in without significant loss in quality.
Wide Angle Lens16MP (f/2.2)NoneOppo offers wider field of view for landscape photography.
Macro Lens2MP (f/2.4)2MP (f/2.4)Similar macro capabilities on both devices
Video RecordingUp to 4K@60fps, EIS, HDR1080p@30fpsOppo can record much higher-quality video, with better stabilization.
Camera Features4K Video, Optical zoom, Quadruple camera, OIS, Continuous autofocus, CDAF, Dual shot, Night ModeDual camera, Laser autofocus (LAF)Oppo has a more versatile camera system with more advanced features.
DXoMark106 (Mobile), 104 (Photo), 106 (Video)Not testedOppo has a very good score, but Motorola doesn't have official ratings.
Battery
Capacity4500mAh5000mAhMotorola has slightly higher capacity, likely better battery life.
Charging65W Fast Charging15W Fast ChargingOppo charges much faster.
Battery FeaturesReverse chargingNoneOppo can be used to charge other devices.
Software
OSAndroid 11 (upgradeable to 12)Android 13Motorola has a newer OS out of the box.
Connectivity
WiFiWiFi 6 (802.11ax)802.11acOppo supports a faster and more efficient WiFi standard.
BluetoothBluetooth 5.1, aptX, LDACBluetooth 5.0Oppo supports a newer standard with better audio codecs.
GPSQZSSSUPLOppo supports more precise location tracking.
Storage
Internal128/256GB64/128/256GBBoth offer up to 256GB of storage.
RAM12GB4/8GBOppo offers much more RAM, better for multitasking.
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone offers expandable storage.
Audio
AudioHi-Res AudioDolby AtmosBoth have stereo speakers with different audio enhancements.
Security
FingerprintBasic in displaySide-mountedMotorola's side-mounted fingerprint is likely more convenient.
Build Quality
Screen ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5UnknownOppo has better screen protection
Sensors
SensorsCompass, Gyroscope, Accelerometer, Proximity, FingerprintAccelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, FingerprintOppo has a more complete sensor suite

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Find X3 Neo Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED with 90Hz refresh rate and much higher brightness.
    • Practical Impact: Vibrant, smooth, and clearly visible, even in bright sunlight, enhanced viewing experience.
  • Much Stronger Performance: Powerful Snapdragon 865 chipset.
    • Practical Impact: Faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming experience.
  • More Advanced Camera System: Versatile camera setup with telephoto and wide-angle lenses, larger sensor.
    • Practical Impact: Better image quality in various scenarios, more creative flexibility with zooming.
  • Faster Charging: 65W fast charging.
    • Practical Impact: Significantly reduces charging time.
  • More RAM: 12GB RAM for heavy multitasking.
    • Practical Impact: Smoother performance with multiple apps and background processes.
  • Better Connectivity: Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.1.
    • Practical Impact: Faster wireless speeds, and better audio codecs.

Motorola Moto G14 Advantages:

  • Newer OS: Comes with Android 13 out of the box.
    • Practical Impact: More modern features, potential for longer software support.
  • Larger Battery: 5000mAh battery.
    • Practical Impact: Potentially longer battery life, less frequent charging for moderate users.
  • Potentially Lower Price: Typically more budget-friendly.
    • Practical Impact: More affordable option.
  • Side-mounted fingerprint sensor:
    • Practical Impact: More convenient sensor placement.

Significant Trade-offs:

  • Oppo Find X3 Neo trades a large battery and newer OS for superior performance and display technology.
  • Motorola Moto G14 offers a larger battery and newer OS at the expense of performance, display quality, and camera versatility.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Find X3 Neo Ideal User:

  • Power Users: Demanding users who want smooth performance for gaming, multitasking, and resource-intensive apps.
  • Photography Enthusiasts: Users who prioritize camera quality, versatility, and advanced features.
  • Multimedia Consumers: Individuals who value a high-quality display for watching videos and enjoying visual content.
  • Users who prioritize fast charging: Those who need to quickly top up their phone on the go.

Use Cases for Oppo Find X3 Neo:

  • High-end mobile gaming.
  • Professional-grade photography and videography.
  • Extensive multitasking with many apps.
  • Viewing high-resolution content in bright environments.

Motorola Moto G14 Ideal User:

  • Budget-Conscious Buyers: Users looking for a reliable smartphone at an affordable price.
  • Casual Users: Individuals who primarily use their phone for basic tasks, browsing, and social media.
  • Users who prioritize battery life: Those who need a phone that can last through a full day without charging.
  • Users who prefer newer OS: Those that prioritize security and software.

Use Cases for Motorola Moto G14:

  • Everyday web browsing and social media.
  • Basic photography and casual video recording.
  • Long-lasting battery for full-day use.
  • Users needing a reliable device on a budget

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is performance? If you need a phone for gaming, intensive apps, or heavy multitasking, the Oppo is better. For basic usage, the Motorola will suffice.
  2. What is your budget? The Motorola is likely to be more affordable, making it a better choice for budget-conscious buyers.
  3. How important is display quality and camera capabilities? If a vibrant display and versatile camera are a must, the Oppo is superior. If these are not crucial, the Motorola is adequate.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: High Performance and Media Consumption: If your priority is speed, a high-quality display for media, and a versatile camera, choose the Oppo Find X3 Neo.
  • Scenario 2: Budget-Friendly and Long Battery: If your focus is on price and battery life for daily use, the Motorola Moto G14 is the better option.
  • Scenario 3: Balance of Features with budget in mind: If you are looking for a balance of features, including a newer operating system, while on a budget, the Motorola Moto G14 is suitable.

My Choice

Given the choice, I would choose the Oppo Find X3 Neo. While the Motorola Moto G14 offers a larger battery and newer OS, the Oppo’s advantages in performance, display quality, camera capabilities, and charging speed are simply too significant to ignore for my use cases. As a user who values smooth multitasking, high-quality media consumption, and photography, the Oppo Find X3 Neo’s superior specifications and performance enhancements provide a much better overall user experience that aligns with my needs. The trade-off in battery life is acceptable, given the fast charging and superior performance in other key areas.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.