Oppo Find X3 Neo vs Motorola Edge 50 Fusion - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 19, 2021 May 15, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 92.74 cm³ 93.5 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.56 "/g 3.83 "/g
Weight 184 g 174.9 g
Height 159.9 mm 161.9 mm
Width 72.5 mm 73.1 mm
Thickness 8 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Galactic Silver
  • Starlight Black
  • Forest Blue
  • Marshmallow Blue
  • Hot Pink

Display

Screen Size 6.55 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.3 % 91.6 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 393 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1100 nits 1600 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.89 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.52 mAh/cm³ 53.48 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) - International
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) - International
GPU Adreno 650 Adreno 710

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 12 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoMotorola Edge 50 FusionPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions159.9 × 72.5 × 8 mm161.9 × 73.1 × 7.9 mmMotorola is slightly taller and wider, and negligibly thinner. Might be noticeable for users with smaller hands or who prefer compact phones.
Weight184g174.9gMotorola is slightly lighter (9.1g), which might be more comfortable for long usage.
Display
Size6.55"6.7"Motorola has a slightly larger screen, which can be more immersive for media consumption and gaming.
Resolution1080x24001080x2400Both offer the same level of sharpness.
PPI402393Practically identical sharpness; differences will be nearly imperceptible.
TechnologyAMOLEDP-OLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks, with minor differences in color calibration that may be user-preference-dependent.
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzMotorola's display will appear smoother in animations and scrolling.
Brightness1100 nits1600 nitsMotorola will be much more visible in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+)Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm)Both are high-performance chipsets. The Motorola's newer 4nm chip may have better energy efficiency.
AnTuTu Score743,500776,541Both offer similar performance for demanding tasks, like gaming. Motorola is negligibly faster.
GPUAdreno 650Adreno 710Motorola might have slightly better gaming performance thanks to its newer GPU architecture
Camera
Standard Camera50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56", Sony IMX76650MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56", Sony LYT-700CBoth feature high-quality primary sensors. Differences may exist in low-light performance and image processing.
Selfie Camera32MP, f/2.4, 1/2.74", Sony IMX61532MP, f/2.45, 1/3.14", Samsung S5KJD1Oppo's selfie camera has a larger sensor for potentially better low-light and detail.
Telephoto Lens13MP, f/2.4NoneOppo offers 2x optical zoom for better portrait photos and zoomed shots. Motorola lacks a dedicated telephoto lens.
Wide Angle Lens16MP, f/2.2NoneOppo can capture wider scenes. Motorola lacks a dedicated wide-angle camera lens.
Macro Lens2MP, f/2.4NoneOppo has a dedicated macro lens for close-up shots. Motorola lacks a dedicated macro lens.
Wide Angle + MacroNone13MP, f/2.2, 1/3", Hynix Hi-1336Motorola has a combined wide-angle and macro camera. Oppo has dedicated macro and wide-angle lens.
VideoUp to 4K@60fps with HDR, EISUp to 4K@30fps with EISBoth are capable of shooting 4K video with stabilization. Motorola has a higher slow motion video capability. Oppo has HDR at higher framerates.
DXOMark106 (Mobile)Not testedOppo has been tested by DXOMark and scored well. Motorola doesn't have a DXOMark score.
Battery
Capacity4500mAh5000mAhMotorola has a larger battery, which means longer battery life.
Charging65W68WBoth offer fast charging; Motorola is slightly faster.
FeaturesReverse chargingReverse chargingBoth allow reverse charging.
Software
OSAndroid 11 (upgradable to 12)Android 14 (upgradable to 17)Motorola has a significantly newer and longer-supported operating system.
Connectivity
WiFiWiFi 6WiFi 6EMotorola supports a newer WiFi standard, which can provide faster speeds and lower latency if paired with a compatible router.
Bluetooth5.15.3Motorola has a newer Bluetooth version, potentially offering better energy efficiency and connection stability.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, SUPL, Galileo, GPS (L1+L5), Galileo (E1+E5a), NavIC SystemMotorola offers more accurate location tracking.
SIMDual SIM (Nano + Nano)Dual SIM (Nano + eSIM)Motorola offers an eSIM option, which is useful for travelers. Oppo uses two physical SIM cards.
Storage
Internal128/256 GB128/256/512 GBMotorola offers more storage options, up to 512 GB, ideal for users with large media libraries.
RAM12 GB8/12 GBBoth are good for multitasking.
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone allows for additional storage.
Audio
QualityHi-Res Audio, Stereo SpeakersDolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 2 microphonesBoth have stereo speakers. Motorola offers Dolby Atmos for enhanced audio and dedicated microphones. Oppo has Hi-Res Audio certification.
Security
FeaturesBasic fingerprint sensorBasic fingerprint sensorBoth offer basic fingerprint security.
Build Quality
ProtectionGorilla Glass 5Gorilla Glass 5Both have similar levels of screen protection.
Sensors
FeaturesFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, GyroscopeFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, GyroscopeBoth phones have a standard array of sensors. Oppo also has Gravity and Pedometer sensors.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Find X3 Neo Advantages:

  • More versatile camera system: Offers a dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom, a dedicated wide-angle lens, and a dedicated macro lens.
  • Potentially better selfie camera: Larger sensor for better low-light photos.
  • Hi-Res Audio: Appeals to audiophiles.
  • Higher framerate HDR video: The phone is capable of recording HDR videos at both 60 and 30fps compared to Motorola's 30fps limitation.

Motorola Edge 50 Fusion Advantages:

  • Newer Software: Comes with Android 14 and a promise of further updates for a longer period.
  • Larger, Brighter Display: More immersive with higher refresh rate and much brighter screen.
  • Newer WiFi Standard: WiFi 6E for faster, more reliable wireless connections.
  • Larger Battery: Longer battery life for users who are on the go.
  • More Storage Options: Up to 512 GB internal storage.
  • Better GPS: More accurate location tracking thanks to more satellite systems.
  • eSIM Support: Useful for traveling and managing multiple phone plans.
  • Better Audio System: Improved spatial audio via Dolby Atmos.

Trade-offs:

  • Oppo: Has an older OS and lacks some modern connectivity features but offers a more versatile camera setup for photography enthusiasts.
  • Motorola: Lacks the versatile camera setup including a dedicated telephoto, wide-angle and macro lenses and sacrifices some camera flexibility for better software, display, connectivity and battery life.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Find X3 Neo Ideal User:

  • Photography Enthusiasts: Those who want a versatile camera with dedicated telephoto, wide-angle, and macro lenses.
  • Users who prioritize Hi-Res Audio: Those who will enjoy the High-Resolution audio.
  • Users who don't mind older software: Those who don't mind having older software or are going to buy the phone with a low price.

Use Cases:

  • Detailed photography: Capturing diverse scenes with different focal lengths.
  • Zoom photography: Taking close up photos of subjects in the distance using the optical zoom.
  • Macro photography: Taking detailed shots of small objects such as flowers or insects.
  • HDR video: Recording HDR videos at 60 and 30fps.

Motorola Edge 50 Fusion Ideal User:

  • Power Users: Who need a larger battery, fast charging, and a smooth display.
  • Users who prioritize media consumption: Enjoy watching videos and playing games on a large, bright screen with a 120Hz refresh rate.
  • Frequent Travelers: Benefit from eSIM support and a more accurate GPS.
  • Users who prioritize longevity: Get the newest OS and will receive the most updates.

Use Cases:

  • Daily productivity: Enjoy a seamless experience with a faster refresh rate and responsive user interface.
  • Long days without charging: Benefit from the larger battery capacity and fast charging.
  • Outdoor Use: Highly visible display in bright sunlight.
  • Travel Navigation: Accurate location tracking via better GPS.
  • Immersive audio and video: Enjoy better spatial audio for music and movies.
  • eSIM usage: Having an option to have an extra line on the phone.

Price-to-Value:

  • The Motorola is newer and might have a higher price tag, but offers better value for those who want a modern device. The Oppo can be a budget option for a good quality phone. The value of each phone depends on user needs and whether price or features is the higher priority.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your priority between camera versatility and software support/future-proofing? If you love taking photos and want more zoom options, the Oppo will be better for you. But if software updates and longevity are key, Motorola's newer OS will win.
  2. Do you need a brighter display and longer battery life, or is Hi-Res Audio and more photographic flexibility important? If you spend a lot of time outside, the Motorola screen and battery are a must. However, if you're an audiophile or need more photographic options, the Oppo has better options.
  3. How important are modern connectivity features like WiFi 6E and eSIM to you? If you are going to make use of a 6E router or you would like to use an eSIM, then the Motorola is the only option. If these are not important to you, both phones will work perfectly fine.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Photography-Focused User: Choose the Oppo Find X3 Neo for its versatile camera system with telephoto, wide-angle, and macro lenses.
  • Scenario 2: Multimedia Consumption & Outdoor Use: Choose the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion for its larger, brighter display, smooth refresh rate, and bigger battery.
  • Scenario 3: Long-Term Use & Connectivity: Choose the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion for its newer OS, better GPS, WiFi 6E, and eSIM support.
  • Scenario 4: Budget-Conscious Buyer: The Oppo Find X3 Neo is likely to be more affordable, potentially offering a good value for those who do not need the latest specifications.

What I Would Choose and Why

Based on my analysis, I would choose the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion. Here's why:

  • Future-Proofing: The newer operating system (Android 14) and the promise of further updates (up to Android 17) make it a more sensible investment for long-term usage. The Oppo's older Android 11 (upgradable to 12) limits its lifespan.
  • Display Experience: The brighter screen with a 120Hz refresh rate significantly enhances the user experience, making it better for everyday use, media consumption, and gaming.
  • Battery and Charging: The larger 5000mAh battery and faster 68W charging mean I can use the phone more confidently without constantly worrying about battery life.
  • Modern Connectivity: The addition of WiFi 6E and eSIM support adds significant value by future-proofing my connectivity.
  • Performance and Efficiency: The newer 4nm chipset is more efficient which combined with the bigger battery translates to a much longer battery life.

While I value a versatile camera setup and high-resolution audio, the trade-offs in software longevity, display quality, and battery performance make the Motorola a better overall pick for my usage patterns and preferences. The Motorola's camera, while lacking a dedicated telephoto lens, is still a capable shooter for everyday photography.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.