Oppo Find X3 Neo vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 19, 2021 September 14, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 92.74 cm³ 90.78 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.56 "/g 3.85 "/g
Weight 184 g 170 g
Height 159.9 mm 159.6 mm
Width 72.5 mm 72 mm
Thickness 8 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Galactic Silver
  • Starlight Black
  • Black
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Soothing Sea
  • Caneel Bay

Display

Screen Size 6.55 " 6.55 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.3 % 90.1 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 402 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 144 Hz
Typical Brightness 500 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1100 nits 1300 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 104.89 mAh/in² 116.54 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.52 mAh/cm³ 55.08 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 650 Mali-G610 MC3

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 12 15

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Oppo Find X3 Neo vs. Motorola Edge 40 Neo

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureOppo Find X3 NeoMotorola Edge 40 NeoPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions159.9 × 72.5 × 8 mm159.6 × 72 × 7.9 mmVery similar size, the Motorola is negligibly smaller and thinner.
Weight184g170gMotorola Edge 40 Neo is lighter, making it more comfortable for prolonged use.
Display
Size6.55"6.55"Identical screen size for both phones.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2400Same sharpness and detail on both displays.
PPI402402Identical pixel density means the same level of clarity.
TechnologyAMOLEDP-OLEDBoth offer excellent colors and deep blacks; P-OLED is a variation of OLED.
Refresh Rate90Hz144HzMotorola Edge 40 Neo's 144Hz is noticeably smoother in animations, gaming, and scrolling.
Brightness1100 nits1300 nitsMotorola Edge 40 Neo will be more visible outdoors on sunny days.
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+)MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm)Snapdragon 865 is more powerful on paper and in benchmarks.
AnTuTu Score743,500527,666Oppo Find X3 Neo offers faster overall performance, app loading, and smoother operation.
GPUAdreno 650Mali-G610 MC3Oppo's Adreno GPU generally offers better gaming performance.
Battery
Capacity4500mAh5000mAhMotorola Edge 40 Neo likely provides longer battery life on a single charge.
Charging65W fast charging68W fast chargingSimilar fast charging speeds, negligible real-world difference.
FeaturesReverse ChargingNoneOppo can charge other devices wirelessly, a useful addition for some.
Camera
Main Camera50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56" Sony IMX76650MP, f/1.8, 1/1.55" Omnivision OV50AComparable main camera performance, slight difference in sensor size.
Selfie Camera32MP, f/2.4, 1/2.74" Sony IMX615, 0.8µm32MP, f/2.4, 0.7µmSimilar selfie capabilities.
Telephoto Lens13MP, f/2.4NoneOppo has an extra telephoto lens, for optical zoom.
Wide-Angle Lens16MP, f/2.2NoneOppo has an extra wide-angle lens, for group shots and landscapes.
Macro Lens2MP, f/2.4NoneOppo has a dedicated macro lens for close up shots.
Wide Angle + MacroNone13MP, f/2.2, 1.12µmMotorola combines the two functionalities in one sensor.
Video4K@60fps, HDR, EIS4K@30fps, EISOppo offers 4K video at 60fps.
DxOMark (Mobile)Main: 106, Photo: 104, Video: 106Main: 103, Photo: 102, Video: 116Motorola Edge 40 Neo performs better in video recording with 10 points difference
Camera FeaturesOIS, PDAF, CDAF, Optical Zoom, Quadruple CameraOIS, PDAF, LAF, Dual Camera, RAWOppo has optical zoom, and more cameras. Motorola has Laser autofocus and RAW image output
Software
OSAndroid 11 (upgradable to 12)Android 13 (upgradable to 15)Motorola Edge 40 Neo has the newer OS and will receive more updates.
Connectivity
WiFiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6Both phones use modern Wi-Fi technology.
Bluetooth5.15.4Motorola uses a newer version of Bluetooth.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, SUPL, Galileo, BeiDou (B1)Both phones have similar GPS features
SIMDual Nano SIMDual Nano SIM + eSIMMotorola supports eSIM, which allows switching between providers digitally, while Oppo uses two physical SIM slots.
Storage
Internal128GB/256GB256GBBoth provide ample storage space.
RAM12GB8GB/12GBBoth provide excellent multitasking capabilities, but the 12 GB RAM on both phones allows for better usage
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone offers expandable storage.
Audio
QualityHi-Res Audio, Stereo SpeakersDolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 2 microphonesMotorola provides slightly better sound quality.
Security
FeaturesFingerprint SensorFingerprint SensorStandard fingerprint scanners for security.
Build Quality
ProtectionGorilla Glass 5Gorilla Glass 3Oppo Find X3 Neo is more durable
Sensors
SensorsFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Gravity, PedometerFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, GyroscopeThe Oppo has more sensors for additional functionality.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Find X3 Neo Advantages:

  • Stronger Performance: The Snapdragon 865 offers a significant performance boost over the Dimensity 7030, resulting in smoother app loading and multitasking.
  • Better Gaming: The Adreno 650 GPU is known for better graphics performance, which provides a better gaming experience.
  • More Versatile Camera System: Dedicated telephoto, wide-angle, and macro lenses offer more flexibility in shooting different scenarios.
  • Reverse Charging: This is a useful feature to charge other devices on the go.
  • Better Screen Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass 5 provides a stronger protection than the Corning Gorilla Glass 3

Motorola Edge 40 Neo Advantages:

  • Smoother Display: The 144Hz refresh rate makes animations and scrolling noticeably smoother.
  • Brighter Display: The brighter screen is easier to see in direct sunlight.
  • Larger Battery: The 5000mAh battery gives a longer battery life per charge, which provides extended usage.
  • Newer Software: Android 13 and future updates ensure better support.
  • Better Video Recording: Motorola Edge 40 Neo performs better in video recording.
  • eSIM support: Allows more options when it comes to carriers.
  • Better Audio: Includes Dolby Atmos, dual microphones and stereo speakers, offering better sound quality.

Significant Trade-offs:

  • Oppo: Sacrifices battery life, display smoothness, and some camera features for better performance and more cameras.
  • Motorola: Sacrifices performance for better display and battery life.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Find X3 Neo is Ideal For:

  • Gamers: The powerful chipset and GPU provide a better gaming experience.
  • Power Users: Those who need to multitask, load apps, and require raw power.
  • Photography Enthusiasts: Users who want a versatile camera with multiple lenses for different photography scenarios.
  • Users who need reverse charging: Those who use wireless charging on the go to charge other devices.

Motorola Edge 40 Neo is Ideal For:

  • Media Consumers: Users who value a smooth display and long battery life for watching videos, browsing, and social media.
  • Casual Gamers: Those who do not need the best performance in games, but prioritize a smoother screen.
  • Frequent Travelers: Those who would like to be able to use an eSIM while on the go.
  • Users who prioritize a newer software: Will receive more updates.
  • Users who value great audio quality: The combination of Dolby Atmos and dual microphones makes it the better audio experience.

Use Cases:

  • Oppo: Mobile gaming, heavy multitasking, versatile photography, and charging other devices on the go.
  • Motorola: Streaming movies/TV, browsing social media, long trips (where battery life is essential), better audio for calls and media consumption.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • Both phones are likely in the same price range, but the Oppo Find X3 Neo may be slightly cheaper due to its age.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is performance for your daily usage? If you play high-end games or run demanding apps, the Oppo is likely a better choice.
  2. How important is a smooth display and longer battery life? If you value those features, the Motorola is a better option.
  3. How important is the camera system? If you prefer a more versatile camera system, the Oppo may be a better fit; if video quality is crucial, consider the Motorola.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Mobile Gamer: If gaming is the primary focus, the Oppo Find X3 Neo is recommended due to its superior performance.
  • Scenario 2: Content Consumer: If watching videos, streaming media, and social media is your priority, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo with its smoother display and long battery life is preferred.
  • Scenario 3: Photography Enthusiast: If you want the most versatile camera and multiple lenses, the Oppo Find X3 Neo is the better option, but if video is a priority, consider the Motorola.
  • Scenario 4: Everyday User: The Motorola Edge 40 Neo is better for general use with a smoother display and longer battery.

My Choice

I would choose the Motorola Edge 40 Neo. While the Oppo Find X3 Neo offers better performance, the Edge 40 Neo provides a more well-rounded experience for my typical usage. I value a smooth 144Hz display and longer battery life for browsing, watching videos, and general daily use. Although I sometimes play mobile games, I am not a hardcore gamer that would benefit from the extra performance of the Oppo. Furthermore, I value the better audio quality and a newer operating system that the Motorola offers, while the main camera is still very good for everyday photography. For me, the trade-off in performance is acceptable for the benefits in display quality, battery life, software and audio.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.