Oppo Find N3 Flip vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date September 8, 2023 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 98.38 cm³ 90.05 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.43 "/g 3.65 "/g
Weight 198 g 189 g
Height 166.4 mm 171.4 mm
Width 75.8 mm 74 mm
Thickness 7.8 mm 7.1 mm
Foldable Design Yes Yes
Available Colors
  • Cream Gold
  • Misty Pink
  • Sleek Black
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Spring Green (Dill)
  • Midnight Blue (Navy Blazer)

Display

Screen Size 6.8 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2520 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 21:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.6 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 403 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 165 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1200 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1600 nits 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 92.99 mAh/in² 84.02 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.71 mAh/cm³ 44.42 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4300 mAh 4000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 9200 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Immortalis-G715 MC11 Adreno 735

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureOppo Find N3 FlipMotorola Razr 50 UltraPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions166.4 x 75.8 x 7.8 mm171.4 x 74 x 7.1 mmRazr 50 Ultra is slightly taller and thinner when unfolded, but the N3 Flip is narrower. Impact on one-handed usability depends on individual hand size.
Weight198g189gRazr 50 Ultra is noticeably lighter, improving portability and reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
FoldableYesYesBoth are foldable, offering compact portability. No information on specific hinge mechanism durability for comparison.
Display
Size6.8"6.9"Negligible difference in main screen size.
TypeFoldable LTPO AMOLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLEDBoth offer excellent color accuracy, power efficiency, and smooth scrolling. Durability of the folding screen is not compared as specifications are missing.
Resolution1080 x 25201080 x 2640Razr 50 Ultra has a slightly higher resolution, resulting in marginally sharper text and images. The difference is unlikely to be noticeable in everyday use.
Refresh Rate120Hz165HzRazr 50 Ultra offers a higher refresh rate, leading to smoother animations and transitions, especially noticeable in gaming and fast-scrolling.
Peak Brightness1600 nits3000 nitsRazr 50 Ultra's significantly higher peak brightness ensures superior outdoor visibility in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 9200 (4 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)Both are high-end chipsets offering excellent performance. Benchmarking comparisons would be needed for definitive performance ranking.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)Both CPUs offer high performance. Architectural differences might lead to variations in specific tasks. Real-world performance differences would require benchmark comparisons.
GPUImmortalis-G715 MC11Adreno 735Both GPUs are capable of handling demanding games and applications. Direct comparison requires benchmark data.
RAM12GB12GBBoth phones have ample RAM for multitasking and smooth performance.
Storage512GB256GBThe N3 Flip offers double the storage, allowing for more apps, photos, and videos to be stored locally.
Battery
Capacity4300 mAh4000 mAhThe N3 Flip has a larger battery, potentially offering longer battery life. Real-world usage will vary.
Camera
Video Capabilities4K@30fps, 1080p at various fpsUp to 4K@60fps, 1080p at various fps including 960fps slow-moRazr 50 Ultra offers more comprehensive video recording options, including higher resolution and frame rate, and slow-motion capture. Detailed camera sensor specifications are missing for in-depth comparison.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Find N3 Flip Advantages:

  • Larger battery capacity potentially leading to longer usage time.
  • Double the storage capacity.

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Advantages:

  • Lighter and thinner design, improving portability.
  • Brighter display for better outdoor visibility.
  • Higher refresh rate screen for smoother visuals.
  • More comprehensive video recording capabilities.
  • Newer Android OS at launch (Android 14 vs Android 13).

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Find N3 Flip: Users who prioritize longer battery life and ample storage.

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra: Users who value a lightweight and portable design, a bright and smooth display, and advanced video recording features.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. How important is battery life and storage? If these are top priorities, the N3 Flip is a strong contender.
  2. Do you prioritize portability and a premium display? If so, the Razr 50 Ultra is the better choice.
  3. Is video recording a key factor? The Razr 50 Ultra offers significantly better video features.

My Choice: Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

While the Oppo Find N3 Flip offers a larger battery and more storage, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra's superior display, lighter design, and more advanced video capabilities are more compelling to me. The brighter screen and higher refresh rate significantly enhance daily usage, and the weight difference makes it more comfortable for extended use. While storage is important, cloud services mitigate the difference to some extent, and the improved portability and user experience outweigh the storage advantage for my personal needs. The newer Android version at launch is also a plus.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.