Oppo Find N3 Flip vs Motorola Edge 50 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date September 8, 2023 April 8, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 98.38 cm³ 95.7 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.43 "/g 3.6 "/g
Weight 198 g 186 g
Height 166.4 mm 161.2 mm
Width 75.8 mm 72.4 mm
Thickness 7.8 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design Yes No
Available Colors
  • Cream Gold
  • Misty Pink
  • Sleek Black
  • Vanilla Cream
  • Luxe Lavender
  • Black Beauty
  • Moonlight Pearl

Display

Screen Size 6.8 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2520 1220 x 2712
Aspect Ratio 21:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.6 % 92.8 %
Pixel Density 403 PPI 446 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1200 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1600 nits 2000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 92.99 mAh/in² 100.25 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.71 mAh/cm³ 47.02 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4300 mAh 4500 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 9200 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Immortalis-G715 MC11 Adreno 720

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.1
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version N/A 1.4
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureOppo Find N3 FlipMotorola Edge 50 ProPractical Impact
Design
Form FactorFoldableStandard SlabFoldable design offers portability and a unique form factor, but may compromise durability. Slab design is more traditional and potentially more robust.
Dimensions (mm)166.4 x 75.8 x 7.8161.2 x 72.4 x 8.2The Oppo is slightly taller and thicker when unfolded but significantly more compact when folded. The Motorola is thinner overall when unfolded.
Weight (g)198186The Motorola is slightly lighter.
Display
Display TypeFoldable LTPO AMOLEDP-OLEDOppo uses a more advanced LTPO panel allowing for dynamic refresh rate adjustment for better battery life.
Size (inches)6.86.7Negligible size difference in practical usage.
Resolution1080 x 25201220 x 2712Motorola has a slightly sharper display due to the higher resolution.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120144Motorola offers a higher refresh rate leading to smoother animations and scrolling. However, the difference between 120Hz and 144Hz is less noticeable than the jump from 60Hz to 120Hz.
Peak Brightness (nits)16002000Motorola's display can get brighter, improving outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 9200 (4 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm)Both are powerful chipsets, but benchmarks suggest the Dimensity 9200 performs slightly better in demanding tasks.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)Dimensity 9200 has a higher clock speed on the prime core, potentially offering faster single-core performance.
GPUImmortalis-G715 MC11Adreno 720Dimensity 9200's GPU generally offers better gaming performance.
RAM12GB12GBBoth phones have ample RAM for multitasking.
Storage512GB256GB/512GBBoth offer ample storage; Motorola offers a 256GB option for potentially lower cost.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)43004500Motorola offers a slightly larger battery capacity.
Camera
Video Capabilities4K@30fps, 1080p at various fps4K@30fps (HDR, EIS), 1080p at various fpsMotorola includes HDR in its video recording, potentially resulting in better dynamic range. Specific camera sensor details are missing, preventing a comprehensive camera comparison.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo Find N3 Flip Advantages:

  • Foldable Form Factor: Offers greater portability and a unique user experience.
  • More Powerful Chipset: The Dimensity 9200 generally outperforms the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3.
  • LTPO Display: More power efficient due to dynamic refresh rate.

Motorola Edge 50 Pro Advantages:

  • Higher Resolution and Brighter Display:Sharper visuals and better outdoor visibility.
  • Slightly Larger Battery: Potentially longer battery life.
  • HDR Video Recording: Captures videos with wider dynamic range.
  • Potentially Lower Price: Availability of a 256GB model.
  • Standard Slab Design: More durable and familiar form factor for many users.

Trade-offs:

  • Oppo: Durability concerns associated with foldable phones, potentially higher price.
  • Motorola: Less powerful chipset, less portable due to traditional form factor.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo Find N3 Flip: Ideal for users who prioritize portability and a cutting-edge design and are willing to pay a premium for it. Suitable for those who value a powerful device for multitasking and demanding applications.

Motorola Edge 50 Pro: Suitable for users who prefer a traditional smartphone design with a focus on a great display and potentially longer battery life. Good for users who prioritize media consumption and casual gaming. A more budget-conscious choice without significantly compromising performance.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Form Factor Preference: Do you prioritize portability and a novel design (foldable) or a more traditional, potentially more robust design?
  2. Performance Needs: Do you require top-tier processing power for demanding tasks and gaming, or is a good balance of performance and battery life sufficient?
  3. Budget: Which phone offers the best value for your budget considering its features and your specific needs?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Frequent Traveler: Oppo Find N3 Flip for its compact folded size.
  • Heavy Gamer: Oppo Find N3 Flip for its more powerful chipset.
  • Budget-Conscious User: Motorola Edge 50 Pro for its potential lower price with the 256GB option.
  • Outdoor Enthusiast: Motorola Edge 50 Pro for its brighter display.

My Choice: Motorola Edge 50 Pro

While the Oppo Find N3 Flip boasts a more powerful chipset and the appealing novelty of a foldable design, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro better suits my personal needs and priorities. I value a bright, sharp display for media consumption and a robust, reliable device for everyday use. The slightly larger battery and potential for longer battery life are also appealing. While I appreciate the innovation of foldable phones, I am not convinced the trade-offs in durability and price are worthwhile for my usage patterns. The Motorola offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price, making it the more compelling choice for me. The availability of HDR video recording is a bonus for capturing memories. Ultimately, the Motorola feels like a more practical and well-rounded device for my needs.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.