Oppo Find N2 Flip vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date December 23, 2022 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 93.74 cm³ 90.05 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.56 "/g 3.65 "/g
Weight 191 g 189 g
Height 166.2 mm 171.4 mm
Width 75.2 mm 74 mm
Thickness 7.5 mm 7.1 mm
Foldable Design Yes Yes
Available Colors
  • Gold
  • Astral Black
  • Moonlit Purple
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Spring Green (Dill)
  • Midnight Blue (Navy Blazer)

Display

Screen Size 6.8 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2520 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 21:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 86.4 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 403 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 165 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness 1200 nits N/A
Peak Brightness 1600 nits 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 92.99 mAh/in² 84.02 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.87 mAh/cm³ 44.42 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4300 mAh 4000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.20 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Mali-G710 MC10 Adreno 735

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17 17

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Oppo Find N2 Flip and the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra, dissecting their technical specifications and translating them into real-world implications for you.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureOppo Find N2 FlipMotorola Razr 50 UltraReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)166.2 x 75.2 x 7.5171.4 x 74 x 7.1Razr 50 Ultra is slightly taller and narrower when unfolded. Both are pocketable when folded.
Weight (g)191189Negligible weight difference; both feel substantial in hand.
Display
Main Display Size6.8"6.9"Razr offers a marginally larger screen real estate.
Resolution1080 x 25201080 x 2640Similar pixel density, resulting in sharp visuals on both. Razr's taller aspect ratio might be preferable.
Refresh Rate120Hz165HzRazr's higher refresh rate delivers smoother animations and scrolling, especially noticeable in gaming.
Peak Brightness1600 nits3000 nitsRazr's significantly higher peak brightness ensures superior outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetDimensity 9000+ (4nm)Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm)Both chipsets offer flagship-level performance, but Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 generally benchmarks slightly higher.
CPUOcta-core (Cortex-X2, A710, A510)Octa-core (Cortex-X4, A720, A520)Both are powerful CPUs; real-world performance differences will be minimal for average users.
RAM8GB12GBRazr's extra RAM could provide better multitasking performance in demanding scenarios.
Camera
Main Camera50MP (Sony IMX890)50MP (Samsung GN8)Both feature high-resolution sensors, but image quality will depend on processing and software tuning.
Secondary Camera8MP Wide Angle50MP Wide Angle + 2X ZoomRazr offers a significantly more versatile camera system with a high-resolution ultrawide and telephoto lens.
Battery Life
Capacity4300 mAh4000 mAhFind N2 Flip has a larger battery, potentially leading to longer usage time.

2. Key Insights

  • Display: The Razr 50 Ultra boasts a brighter, smoother display thanks to its higher peak brightness and 165Hz refresh rate. This translates to a more enjoyable experience in bright sunlight and with fast-paced content. The Find N2 Flip's display is no slouch, but the Razr edges out in this category.
  • Performance: While both phones pack powerful processors, the Razr 50 Ultra, with its Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 and larger RAM, likely offers a slight performance advantage in demanding tasks and heavy multitasking. However, for everyday use, both phones should provide a smooth and responsive experience.
  • Camera: The Razr 50 Ultra's triple camera system clearly surpasses the Find N2 Flip's dual camera setup. The inclusion of a high-resolution ultrawide and a dedicated telephoto lens provides significantly greater flexibility for capturing various scenes.
  • Battery Life: The Find N2 Flip's larger battery capacity suggests it might offer longer usage on a single charge. However, real-world battery life is influenced by numerous factors, including software optimization and usage patterns.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Oppo Find N2 Flip: This phone is a good choice for users who prioritize a compact foldable design, a solid main camera, and potentially longer battery life. It's a great option for those seeking a balance between functionality and portability without breaking the bank.
  • Motorola Razr 50 Ultra: Ideal for users who value a top-tier display, cutting-edge performance, and a versatile camera system. The larger external display could be a significant draw for those who frequently interact with notifications and widgets without unfolding the phone.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? The Razr 50 Ultra is generally more expensive. If price is a primary concern, the Find N2 Flip offers excellent value.
  2. Are camera capabilities a priority? If you frequently take photos and videos, the Razr 50 Ultra's superior camera system is the clear winner.
  3. How important is display quality? If you consume a lot of media or game frequently, the Razr's brighter and smoother display will be more appealing.

My Choice: Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

While the Oppo Find N2 Flip is a compelling device, I would choose the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra. The deciding factors for me are the significantly more versatile camera system, the stunning display with its high refresh rate and brightness, and the slight edge in performance offered by the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3. The larger external display also provides a more functional experience when the phone is closed. While the battery capacity is slightly smaller, I'm willing to make that trade-off for the superior overall user experience. The Razr 50 Ultra feels like a more future-proof device, ready to handle demanding tasks and evolving user needs.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.