Oppo A96 vs Xiaomi Poco M4 5G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Oppo A96
Oppo A96
Oppo

General

Launch Date March 16, 2022 October 7, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 104.54 cm³ 111.08 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.45 "/g 3.29 "/g
Weight 191 g 200 g
Height 164.4 mm 164 mm
Width 75.7 mm 76.1 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Starry Black
  • Sunset Blue
  • Cool Blue
  • Poco Yellow
  • Power Black

Display

Screen Size 6.59 " 6.58 "
Resolution 1080 x 2412 1080 x 2408
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84 % 83.6 %
Pixel Density 401 PPI 401 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 480 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 600 nits 500 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 115.13 mAh/in² 115.48 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.83 mAh/cm³ 45.01 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 610 Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Oppo A96 vs. Xiaomi Poco M4 5G: A User-Centered Comparison

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones through the lens of user experience, not just specs. Let's delve into a narrative-driven comparison of the Oppo A96 and Xiaomi Poco M4 5G.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureOppo A96Xiaomi Poco M4 5GUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignColorOS 11.1 (based on Android 11)MIUI 13 (based on Android 12)MIUI offers potentially more customization options, while ColorOS focuses on a clean aesthetic.
Interaction Flow90Hz refresh rate90Hz refresh rateBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations, enhancing visual fluidity.
AccessibilityStandard Android accessibility featuresStandard Android accessibility featuresSimilar accessibility features likely present in both.
Ergonomics8.4mm thin, 191g8.9mm thin, 200gOppo A96 is slightly thinner and lighter, potentially more comfortable for extended use.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a busy professional who needs a phone for both work and leisure.

  • Oppo A96's Story: The A96 offers a sleek design and a vibrant display for enjoying multimedia content during downtime. The 90Hz refresh rate ensures a smooth experience whether you're scrolling through social media or browsing the web. Its slightly slimmer profile makes it comfortable to hold during long calls.

  • Xiaomi Poco M4 5G's Story: The Poco M4 5G boasts 5G connectivity, ensuring faster download and streaming speeds – crucial for downloading large work files or enjoying high-definition video calls. The MIUI 13 interface provides ample customization options, allowing the user to personalize their phone to match their workflow and preferences.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

Both phones cater to a broad audience. However, users prioritizing the latest Android features and extensive customization might prefer the Poco M4 5G with its Android 12 base and MIUI 13. Users valuing a sleek, lightweight design for comfortable everyday use might lean towards the Oppo A96.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The choice boils down to personal preferences and priorities:

  • Prioritize Design and Comfort: Oppo A96
  • Prioritize 5G and Customization: Xiaomi Poco M4 5G

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco M4 5G

While the Oppo A96 offers a slightly more refined design, I would choose the Xiaomi Poco M4 5G. The deciding factor is the future-proofing offered by 5G connectivity. In today's fast-paced digital landscape, access to high-speed internet is crucial. Furthermore, the Poco M4 5G's newer Android version and MIUI's customization options provide a more flexible and personalized user experience, allowing me to tailor the phone to my specific needs and preferences. Although marginal, the slightly more powerful processor in the Poco M4 5G, indicated by the Cortex-A76 cores compared to the Kryo 265 Gold (which are based on older A73 designs), would likely provide a better experience in the long run.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.