Oppo A96 vs Samsung Galaxy M35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Oppo A96
Oppo A96
Oppo

General

Launch Date March 16, 2022 May 24, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 104.54 cm³ 116.09 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.45 "/g 2.97 "/g
Weight 191 g 222 g
Height 164.4 mm 162.3 mm
Width 75.7 mm 78.6 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Starry Black
  • Sunset Blue
  • Gray
  • Light Blue
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.59 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2412 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84 % 83.8 %
Pixel Density 401 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 480 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 600 nits 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 115.13 mAh/in² 137.74 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.83 mAh/cm³ 51.69 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 610 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Oppo A96 vs. Samsung Galaxy M35: A User-Centered Comparison

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Oppo A96 and Samsung Galaxy M35, focusing on the user experience rather than just raw specifications. We'll use storytelling and a design-centric approach to understand what each phone offers.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureOppo A96Samsung Galaxy M35User Experience Impact
Interface DesignColorOS 11.1 (based on Android 11)One UI Core 5 (based on Android 14)Samsung offers a more modern and updated OS, likely with improved UI elements and features.
Display6.59" IPS LCD (90Hz)6.6" Super AMOLED (120Hz)Samsung's AMOLED display delivers richer colors, deeper blacks, and smoother scrolling due to the higher refresh rate.
Interaction FlowStandard Android navigation with Oppo customizationsSamsung's One UI Core navigationBoth offer familiar Android experiences, but One UI Core is known for its streamlined design.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android accessibility featuresStandard Android accessibility features + One UI enhancementsSamsung potentially provides a more accessible experience due to One UI's focus on usability.
Design Ergonomics191g, 8.4mm thick222g, 9.1mm thickOppo A96 is lighter and thinner, potentially offering a more comfortable one-handed experience.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a college student, Sarah, who needs a phone for everyday tasks, social media, and occasional gaming.

  • Oppo A96: Sarah appreciates the Oppo A96's lightweight design, making it easy to carry around campus all day. The 90Hz display offers smooth scrolling through her Instagram feed. However, she might find the IPS LCD screen less vibrant compared to her friend's AMOLED phone. The battery life is decent for a day's use.

  • Samsung Galaxy M35: Sarah's friend, using the Galaxy M35, enjoys the vibrant Super AMOLED display while watching videos. The 120Hz refresh rate makes gaming feel more responsive. The longer battery life ensures she doesn't have to worry about charging during long study sessions. However, she notices the phone is a bit heavier in her pocket.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • For users who prioritize portability and comfortable handling: The Oppo A96's lighter and slimmer design makes it a winner.
  • For users who value a visually immersive experience with smooth performance: The Samsung Galaxy M35, with its Super AMOLED display and 120Hz refresh rate, is the preferred choice.
  • For budget-conscious users: Both phones fall in the medium price range, but specific pricing should be compared based on region and storage options.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Choosing between these two phones depends on individual priorities:

  • Visual Experience: Samsung Galaxy M35
  • Portability and Comfort: Oppo A96
  • Latest Software: Samsung Galaxy M35
  • Battery Life: Samsung Galaxy M35

My Choice:

I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M35. While the Oppo A96 offers a lighter design, the Galaxy M35's Super AMOLED display, higher refresh rate, more powerful processor, longer battery life, and newer Android version create a significantly better overall user experience. The advantages in screen quality, performance, and software updates outweigh the slight difference in weight and thickness for me. The M35's superior camera features, including optical image stabilization and 4K video recording, further solidify its position as the more compelling device for a user focused on content creation and consumption. It represents a more future-proof investment due to its newer technology and longer software support lifecycle.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.