Oppo A77 vs Xiaomi Redmi 12C - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Oppo A77
Oppo A77
Oppo

General

Launch Date June 10, 2022 January 1, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 98.41 cm³ 113.49 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.45 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 190 g 192 g
Height 163.8 mm 168.8 mm
Width 75.1 mm 76.4 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Black
  • Ocean Blue
  • Mint Green
  • Graphite Gray
  • Ocean Blue
  • Lavender Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.56 " 6.71 "
Resolution 720 x 1612 720 x 1650
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84 % 82.6 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 268 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness 480 nits 500 nits
HBM Brightness 600 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 116.19 mAh/in² 111.05 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.81 mAh/cm³ 44.06 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG microUSB 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 12
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

Oppo A77 vs. Xiaomi Redmi 12C: A Detailed Comparison

Let's dive deep into a comparative analysis of the Oppo A77 and the Xiaomi Redmi 12C, dissecting their specifications and uncovering what they truly offer in terms of real-world performance and user experience.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureOppo A77Xiaomi Redmi 12CReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)163.8 x 75.1 x 8168.8 x 76.4 x 8.8Redmi 12C is slightly larger and thicker.
Weight (g)190192Negligible weight difference.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedDurability and premium feel are unknown.
Display
Size (inches)6.566.71Redmi 12C offers a larger screen for media consumption.
Resolution (px)720 x 1612720 x 1650Similar sharpness; Redmi 12C slightly taller due to aspect ratio.
Display TypeIPS LCD, 90HzIPS LCDA77's 90Hz refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations.
Brightness (nits)480 (typ), 600 (HBM)500 (typ)A77 potentially brighter, especially in HDR content (HBM).
Performance
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 810 (6nm)MediaTek Helio G85 (12nm)A77's Dimensity 810 offers better performance and efficiency due to smaller process node.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.4 GHz A76 & 6x2.0 GHz A55)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz A75 & 6x1.8 GHz A55)A77 likely faster in demanding tasks due to higher clock speeds and more powerful cores.
GPUMali-G57 MC2Mali-G52 MC2A77 should handle graphics-intensive applications better.
RAM6GB (specified variant)Variable (3/4/6GB)More RAM in the A77 improves multitasking and app loading times.
Storage128 GB (specified variant)Variable (32/64/128GB)Storage options vary for both; choose based on your needs.
Camera
Rear Camera50MP (Unspecified secondary)50MP Main, 2MP MacroA77's overall camera setup needs clarification. Redmi 12C's macro lens offers specialized close-up shots.
Front CameraUnspecified5MPA77's front camera resolution needs clarification.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsSimilar video recording capabilities.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery capacities suggest comparable endurance.
ChargingUSB Type-C 2.0microUSB 2.0A77's USB-C offers faster data transfer and potentially faster charging (specs not detailed).
Other
OSAndroid 12 (up to 14)Android 12A77 benefits from longer software updates.
NFCYesYesBoth support contactless payments.
Price RangeMediumLowRedmi 12C is significantly more affordable.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The Oppo A77 significantly outperforms the Redmi 12C thanks to its more powerful Dimensity 810 chipset, superior GPU, and higher RAM configuration. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming performance.
  • Display: While both phones have similar resolutions, the A77's 90Hz refresh rate provides a noticeable advantage in fluidity for everyday tasks like scrolling and animations. This contributes to a more premium user experience.
  • Future-Proofing: The A77's confirmed Android 14 update ensures longer software support and access to the latest features, enhancing its longevity compared to the Redmi 12C.
  • Connectivity: The A77's USB-C port offers a modern standard for faster data transfer and potentially faster charging, though specific charging speeds are not provided for either device. The Redmi 12C's microUSB feels dated.
  • Price: The Redmi 12C's main advantage lies in its affordability. It offers a compelling value proposition for budget-conscious users who prioritize essential features over top-tier performance.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Oppo A77: Suitable for users who value smooth performance, a fluid display, and longer software support. Ideal for gaming, multitasking, and demanding applications.
  • Xiaomi Redmi 12C: Best choice for budget-conscious users who prioritize affordability and essential smartphone functionality. Suitable for light usage, social media, and basic tasks.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? If price is a primary concern, the Redmi 12C offers excellent value.
  2. How important is performance? If you need a phone for demanding tasks or gaming, the A77's superior hardware is crucial.
  3. How long do you plan to keep your phone? The A77's longer software update cycle makes it a better long-term investment.

My Choice: The Oppo A77

While the Redmi 12C is undeniably attractive for its price, I would choose the Oppo A77. The superior performance offered by the Dimensity 810, coupled with the smoother 90Hz display and the promise of Android 14, makes it a more compelling device for my needs. I prioritize a fluid user experience and longevity in a smartphone, and the A77 delivers on these fronts. The difference in price is justifiable for the tangible benefits in daily usage. While specific charging details aren't available for the A77, the modern USB-C port offers advantages over microUSB in the long run. Ultimately, the A77 provides a more well-rounded and future-proof package.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.