Oppo A77 vs Tecno Spark Go 2024 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Oppo A77
Oppo A77
Oppo

General

Launch Date June 10, 2022 December 7, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 98.41 cm³ 106.43 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.45 "/g N/A
Weight 190 g 0 g
Height 163.8 mm 163.7 mm
Width 75.1 mm 75.6 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Black
  • Ocean Blue
  • Mystery White
  • Alpenglow Gold
  • Magic Skin
  • Gravity Black

Display

Screen Size 6.56 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1612 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84 % 84.6 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 480 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 600 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 116.19 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.81 mAh/cm³ 46.98 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

Oppo A77 vs. Tecno Spark Go 2024: A Comparative Analysis

Choosing the right smartphone involves understanding how raw specifications translate into real-world performance. In this head-to-head comparison of the Oppo A77 and Tecno Spark Go 2024, we'll dissect the technical details and uncover what each device offers for different user needs.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureOppo A77Tecno Spark Go 2024Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)163.8 x 75.1 x 8163.7 x 75.6 x 8.6Spark Go 2024 slightly taller and thicker
Weight (g)1900A77's weight is known; Spark Go's missing data hinders comparison
Display
Size (inches)6.566.6Negligible difference in screen real estate
Resolution (px)720 x 1612720 x 1612Identical resolution; sharpness comparable on both
Refresh Rate (Hz)9090Smooth scrolling and animations on both devices
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDSimilar color accuracy and viewing angles expected
Performance
ChipsetDimensity 810 (6nm)Unisoc T606 (12nm)A77 likely offers better performance and efficiency due to smaller node
CPUOcta-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)A77 boasts faster and more powerful cores, potentially translating to smoother multitasking
GPUMali-G57 MC2Mali-G57 MP1A77's GPU likely offers a slight edge in graphics performance
RAM6GB4GBA77's larger RAM enables better multitasking and app switching
Camera
Rear Camera13MP13MP + 0.1MPSimilar primary sensor resolution; Spark Go's secondary sensor's purpose unclear
Selfie Camera16MP8MPA77 boasts a higher resolution front camera
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Comparable battery capacities suggest similar longevity

2. Key Insights

The Oppo A77 emerges as the likely winner in terms of performance, thanks to its more powerful Dimensity 810 chipset, faster CPU cores, and slightly better GPU. The 6GB RAM in the A77 also provides a significant advantage for multitasking compared to the 4GB in the Spark Go 2024. While both phones feature similar display sizes and refresh rates, the A77's superior processing power should translate to a smoother overall user experience, especially when running demanding apps or games.

The Tecno Spark Go 2024, however, positions itself as a more budget-conscious option with the same large battery capacity as the A77. Tecno has added faster charging to this model which can be a huge selling point. While its Unisoc processor might not match the A77's performance, it should still handle everyday tasks adequately. The dual rear camera setup on the Spark Go 2024, while including a seemingly insignificant 0.1MP secondary lens, suggests a potential focus on specific camera features that require further investigation.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Oppo A77: Suitable for users who prioritize performance, smoother multitasking, and a slightly better camera experience. Gamers, content creators, and those who frequently use demanding applications would appreciate the A77's extra power.

Tecno Spark Go 2024: Ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize battery life and value basic functionality. Casual users who primarily use their phones for social media, browsing, and communication would find the Spark Go 2024 sufficient.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • What is your budget? The Tecno Spark Go 2024 is likely the more affordable option.
  • What are your primary phone usage patterns? Heavy users will appreciate the A77's performance, while light users might find the Spark Go adequate.
  • Which features matter most to you? Prioritize performance and a better overall user experience with the A77, or choose the Spark Go 2024 if battery life and affordability are paramount.

My Choice: I would choose the Oppo A77. While the Tecno Spark Go 2024 offers a compelling value proposition for its price, I prioritize the smoother performance and superior multitasking capabilities offered by the A77's Dimensity 810 processor and larger RAM. The enhanced graphics performance of the Mali-G57 MC2 also appeals to me. For my usage, which includes content creation, gaming, and demanding productivity tasks, the A77's performance edge is a deciding factor. The slightly higher price is a worthwhile investment for the long-term benefits of a more responsive and future-proof device.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.