Oppo A77 vs Samsung Galaxy A04e - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Oppo A77
Oppo A77
Oppo

General

Launch Date June 10, 2022 November 7, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 98.41 cm³ 113.41 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.45 "/g 3.46 "/g
Weight 190 g 188 g
Height 163.8 mm 164.2 mm
Width 75.1 mm 75.9 mm
Thickness 8 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Midnight Black
  • Ocean Blue
  • Black
  • Light Blue
  • Copper

Display

Screen Size 6.56 " 6.5 "
Resolution 720 x 1612 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84 % 81.8 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness 480 nits N/A
HBM Brightness 600 nits N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 116.19 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.81 mAh/cm³ 44.09 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)
GPU Mali-G57 MC2 PowerVR GE8320

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 12
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

Oppo A77 vs. Samsung Galaxy A04e: A Comparative Analysis

Let's dive into a detailed comparison of the Oppo A77 and Samsung Galaxy A04e, dissecting their specifications and uncovering what they truly offer in real-world usage.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureOppo A77Samsung Galaxy A04eReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)163.8 x 75.1 x 8164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1A04e slightly larger, thicker. Negligible difference in hand feel for most users.
Weight (g)190188Virtually identical weight; both feel comfortable for extended use.
Display
Size (inches)6.566.5Both offer large screens suitable for media consumption and multitasking.
Resolution (px)720 x 1612720 x 1600Nearly identical; expect similar sharpness. A77's slightly taller aspect ratio might offer marginally more vertical content.
TypeIPS LCD, 90HzPLS LCDA77's 90Hz refresh rate delivers smoother scrolling and animations, a noticeable advantage for a more responsive feel.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 810 (6nm)Mediatek Helio P35 (12nm)A77's Dimensity 810 offers significantly better performance and efficiency due to its superior architecture and smaller manufacturing process.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.4 GHz A76 & 6x2.0 GHz A55)Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz A53 & 4x1.8 GHz A53)A77's CPU boasts faster, more powerful cores, translating to smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming performance.
GPUMali-G57 MC2PowerVR GE8320A77's GPU provides a significant advantage in graphics performance, important for gaming and graphically demanding applications.
RAM6GB3/4GBMore RAM in the A77 allows for smoother multitasking and less frequent app reloading.
Camera
Rear Camera50MP + 2MP13MP + 2MPA77 boasts higher resolution main sensor potentially capturing more detailed photos. Real-world image quality depends on software processing.
Front Camera8MP5MPA77's front camera offers higher resolution for selfies.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery capacity suggests comparable longevity. A77's more efficient chipset might provide slightly better battery life.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The Oppo A77 significantly outperforms the Galaxy A04e due to its more powerful chipset, faster CPU and GPU, and greater RAM. This translates to a smoother, more responsive user experience across the board.
  • Display: While both phones have similar screen sizes and resolutions, the A77's 90Hz refresh rate makes a noticeable difference in fluidity. Scrolling, animations, and gaming feel noticeably smoother on the A77.
  • Camera: The A77's higher-resolution main and front cameras suggest a potential advantage in image quality, but real-world results can vary.
  • Price: The A77 is positioned in the "medium price" range, while the A04e falls into the "low price" category. The price difference reflects the A77's superior hardware.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Oppo A77: Suited for users who prioritize performance, a smooth display, and good camera capabilities. Ideal for moderate to heavy multitasking, gaming, and media consumption.
  • Samsung Galaxy A04e: Best for budget-conscious users who primarily use their phones for basic tasks like calling, texting, browsing, and social media. Performance limitations might be noticeable for demanding applications or heavy multitasking.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? If price is the primary concern, the A04e is the more affordable option.
  2. How important is performance? For a smooth, lag-free experience, especially with multitasking and gaming, the A77 is the clear winner.
  3. What is your primary phone usage? For basic tasks, the A04e suffices. For demanding applications and a more enjoyable user experience, the A77 is recommended.

My Choice: I would choose the Oppo A77. While it's more expensive, the significantly improved performance, smoother display, and better camera potential make it a much more compelling device for my needs. I value a responsive and enjoyable user experience, and the A77's hardware delivers that. The price difference is justifiable for the long-term satisfaction of a smoother, more capable device. The 90Hz refresh rate alone significantly enhances daily interactions. As someone who appreciates the nuances of well-engineered technology, the A77 aligns better with my preferences.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.