Oppo A57 4G vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 6, 2022 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 98.22 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.51 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 187 g 189 g
Height 163.7 mm 164.1 mm
Width 75 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Glowing Black
  • Glowing Green
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.56 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1612 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.2 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 116.19 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.91 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

Alright, let's dive deep into the Oppo A57 4G and the ZTE Blade A75 4G. These two phones are battling it out in the budget-friendly arena, and while they might seem similar on the surface, some crucial differences will sway your decision. Let's break it down, shall we?

1. Specifications Breakdown

Here's a detailed look at how these two stack up, focusing on what really matters to you:

FeatureOppo A57 4GZTE Blade A75 4GReal-World Implications
Design
Size163.7 x 75 x 8 mm164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6 mmVery similar in size, but the ZTE is slightly thicker and may feel a bit bulkier.
Weight187g189gEssentially identical weight - you likely wouldn't notice the difference.
Display
Size6.56"6.6"Both offer similar viewing experiences, the ZTE's 0.04" larger size is barely noticeable.
Resolution720x1612720x1612Both offer a 720p experience, fine for basic usage but may not be very sharp, especially when compared to FHD displays.
Pixel Density269 ppi267 ppiVirtually the same pixel density; very similar viewing clarity.
TechnologyIPS LCDIPS LCDSimilar color reproduction and viewing angles.
Refresh Rate60Hz90HzZTE A75 has an edge: Smoother scrolling, animations. A more fluid user experience.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBoth have similar screen brightness. In practice, they will likely be good for indoor use but not so good in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetMediaTek Helio G35 (12nm)Unisoc T606 (12nm)Different processors. ZTE A75 pulls ahead: On paper, the Unisoc T606 is faster than the Helio G35, offering better app loading and general use.
AnTuTu Score110,000240,000ZTE A75 wins here: Significantly better benchmark score; faster performance overall and better for multitasking.
GPUPowerVR GE8320Mali-G57 MP1Different graphics processors. The Mali G57 MP1 is generally faster than the PowerVR GE8320 so the ZTE A75 is better for gaming.
Camera
Main Camera13MP, f/2.250MP, f/1.8ZTE A75 has a clear advantage Higher resolution and wider aperture, enabling better low-light performance and sharper images.
Selfie Camera8MP, f/2.08MPComparable front-facing camera performance.
Portrait Camera2MP, f/2.4NoneOppo has a dedicated depth sensor for portrait mode.
Macro Lens2MP, f/2.4NoneOppo has a dedicated macro lens.
Video1080p@30fps, Slow-mo 120fps1080p@30fps, No Slow-moSimilar main video quality. Oppo has a big advantage with slow-motion.
FeaturesTriple cam, PDAF, HDR, panorama, etcDual cam, PDAF, HDR, panorama, etcBoth are comparable and share similar camera feature sets.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth offer similar battery life, enough to get through a full day of moderate use.
Charging33W Fast Charging22.5W Fast ChargingOppo A57 charges faster: Faster charging, less time plugged in.
Software
OSAndroid 12, max Android 14Android 13, no maximum version specifiedZTE A75 is slightly better: Comes with a newer Android version out of the box. The Oppo A57 will be upgradeable to Android 14, though.
Connectivity
Wi-Fi802.11ac, dual-band802.11ac, dual-bandComparable Wi-Fi performance.
Bluetooth5.1 with aptX, LDAC5.0Oppo A57 is a bit better Newer Bluetooth with better audio codecs.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoOppo A57 is a bit better supports more satellite systems for potentially better GPS accuracy.
SIMDual SIM, Dual StandbyDual SIM, Dual StandbySimilar dual-SIM functionality.
Storage
Internal64/128 GB128/256 GBZTE has an advantage here. More storage is always better.
RAM3/4 GB4/8 GBZTE has an advantage here. More ram allows for better multitasking.
ExpandableNo expandable storageNo expandable storageNeither have expandable storage.
Audio
QualityStereo SpeakersDTS/DTS XOppo has an advantage here. Stereo speakers are better.
Security
Featuresside-mounted fingerprint sensorside-mounted fingerprint sensorboth are good enough for basic security needs.
Sensors
SensorsAccelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, FingerprintAccelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Fingerprintsimilar configurations with Oppo having Gravity Sensor added.
## 2. Key Insights

Oppo A57 4G:

  • Strengths: Faster charging, a dedicated portrait and macro camera lenses, a more recent bluetooth version, more precise GPS and a great audio system with stereo speakers.
  • Competitive Advantages: A faster charge is a major plus, especially for those always on the go. The portrait and macro cameras and the great audio quality are a bonus.
  • Trade-offs: The Helio G35 chipset is noticeably less powerful. The slightly older Android version.

ZTE Blade A75 4G:

  • Strengths: More powerful performance thanks to the Unisoc T606, higher resolution main camera, and higher refresh rate screen. Has better storage and RAM options.
  • Competitive Advantages: The superior performance makes the A75 feel more responsive. More storage and RAM are also very helpful.
  • Trade-offs: Slower charging and an older Bluetooth version. Lacks dedicated macro and portrait lenses.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Oppo A57 4G:
    • Best for: Users who prioritize fast charging and great audio quality, take a lot of photos and are happy with decent performance.
    • Use Cases: Great for social media browsing, multimedia consumption, capturing quick snaps, and calls.
  • ZTE Blade A75 4G:
    • Best for: Users who need a more responsive experience and extra storage.
    • Use Cases: Ideal for multitasking, moderate gaming, and day-to-day tasks.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three questions to help you make the right choice:

  1. How important is performance to you? If you need a faster, more responsive phone for games or heavy apps, the ZTE Blade A75 4G is the better choice.
  2. Do you want fast charging and great audio? If you want to spend less time plugged in and listen to music or podcasts a lot, the Oppo A57 4G is better suited.
  3. How much storage do you really need? If you take a lot of photos, videos, and install a lot of apps, the ZTE Blade A75 4G is better.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • The Social Media Savvy: ZTE Blade A75 4G because it provides faster performance for quick edits and multitasking.
  • The Mobile Gamer: ZTE Blade A75 4G for a better overall gaming experience and faster performance.
  • The On-the-Go User: Oppo A57 4G for the faster charging time and great audio.
  • The Photography Lover: Oppo A57 4G because of the added portrait and macro camera lenses, alongside great audio quality to enjoy recorded videos.
  • The Budget Conscious: ZTE Blade A75 4G for the higher value proposition due to its better performance and storage.

My Choice

If I had to choose, I'd go for the ZTE Blade A75 4G. While the Oppo A57 4G’s fast charging and great audio quality are tempting, the significant performance boost you get with the A75, coupled with more storage and RAM, make it the more practical choice overall. For a phone that is meant to do more than just the basic tasks, this phone is a great performer. The higher refresh rate display is also a big plus for everyday use, making the phone feel more premium. While the slower charging speed and lack of a portrait lens are trade-offs, the general speed and storage upgrade is a worthy compromise for everyday life.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.