Oppo A57 4G vs Xiaomi Poco M5s - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 6, 2022 September 6, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 98.22 cm³ 99.25 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.51 "/g 3.6 "/g
Weight 187 g 178.8 g
Height 163.7 mm 160.5 mm
Width 75 mm 74.5 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Glowing Black
  • Glowing Green
  • Blue
  • White
  • Gray

Display

Screen Size 6.56 " 6.43 "
Resolution 720 x 1612 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.2 % 83.5 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 409 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A N/A
Typical Brightness N/A 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 700 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 1100 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 116.19 mAh/in² 120.93 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.91 mAh/cm³ 50.38 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G76 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 12
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

Okay, let's dive deep into this comparison between the Oppo A57 4G and the Xiaomi Poco M5s. As a tech journalist, I'm all about translating the specs into real-world experiences, so let's get started!

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureOppo A57 4GXiaomi Poco M5sReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions163.7 × 75 × 8 mm160.5 × 74.5 × 8.3 mmOppo is slightly taller, while Poco is a bit thicker. The difference is negligible, it won't impact your daily use much.
Weight187g178.8gPoco is marginally lighter, better for extended use.
Display
Size6.56"6.43"Oppo’s screen is slightly larger, better for media consumption.
Resolution720x16121080x2400Poco’s display is much sharper, resulting in significantly clearer images and texts.
Pixel Density (PPI)269409Poco’s higher PPI means a noticeably crisper and more detailed visual experience.
TechnologyIPS LCDAMOLEDPoco offers deeper blacks, superior contrast, more vibrant colors, and better power efficiency for dark themes.
Refresh Rate60Hz60HzBoth offer standard 60Hz refresh rates, resulting in the same level of smoothness.
Brightness0 nits1100 nitsPoco has much better outdoor visibility, very important when using your phone in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G35Mediatek Helio G95Poco has a much faster processor, delivering a smoother experience for all tasks including gaming.
AnTuTu Score110,000418,627Poco is significantly faster in benchmarks, translating to a very noticeable difference in real world performance.
GPUPowerVR GE8320Mali-G76 MC4Poco has a substantially better GPU, making it much better for gaming.
Camera
Main Camera13MP, f/2.264MP, f/1.9Poco’s main camera is significantly better in terms of resolution and aperture, resulting in superior photos.
Selfie Camera8MP, f/2.013MP, f/2.4Poco's selfie camera has a higher resolution but a slightly narrower aperture.
Wide Angle CameraN/A8MP, f/2.2Poco offers a versatile wide-angle lens which the Oppo A57 4G lacks, useful for landscape and group photos.
Portrait Camera2MP, f/2.42MP, f/2.4Both have very similar portrait cameras, though Poco may offer slightly better depth-of-field due to sensor size.
Macro Camera2MP, f/2.42MP, f/2.4Both feature a similar macro camera, mostly a marketing feature rather than a must-have camera.
Video Recording1080p@30fpsUp to 4K@30fpsPoco supports much higher resolution video recording, a critical advantage for content creators.
Additional FeaturesTriple camera, PDAFQuad camera, 4K video, Night ModePoco has 4K video, quad camera and a night mode for superior nighttime pictures.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth phones have the same battery capacity, meaning similar battery life.
Charging33W fast charging33W fast chargingBoth devices support 33W fast charging, offering comparable charging speeds.
FeaturesNon-removableReverse charging, Non-removablePoco offers the option to reverse-charge other devices, a useful but not vital feature.
Software
OSAndroid 12 (upgradable to 14)Android 12The Oppo can be upgraded to a newer Android version and will get system updates longer.
Connectivity
WiFi802.11ac, Dual Band802.11ac, Dual BandBoth have similar WiFi capabilities.
Bluetooth5.1, LE, AptX, LDAC, SBC, AAC5.0, LE, EDR, HIDOppo offers a newer Bluetooth version, which can have a better range and also better codecs for audio.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoOppo supports more satellite systems for a higher accuracy location tracking.
SIMDual SIM Dual StandbyDual SIM Dual StandbyBoth offer dual SIM support, which is vital for people who travel or need two numbers.
Storage
Internal64/128GB64/128/256GBPoco offers more storage at the top end.
RAM3/4 GB4/6/8GBPoco offers more RAM options.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone offers expandable storage.
Audio
QualityStereo SpeakersHi-Res Audio, Stereo SpeakersPoco offers superior audio quality with Hi-Res certification, also has stereo speakers.
Security
FeaturesSide-mounted FingerprintSide-mounted FingerprintBoth have a side-mounted fingerprint sensor, a convenient feature for unlocking your phone.
Build Quality
ProtectionUnknownGorilla Glass 3The Xiaomi Poco M5s is more resistant to scratches and impacts.
Sensors
SensorsFingerprint, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, ProximityFingerprint, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Ultrasonic ProximityBoth phones have most sensors, each having unique sensors, both useful for certain features.

2. Key Insights

  • Oppo A57 4G: Its main strength is a slightly larger display and a more recent Bluetooth version. It also offers a wider array of satellite navigation systems and promises more software updates. It focuses on basic functionality with a decent, if not amazing, camera and user experience.
  • Xiaomi Poco M5s: This phone is a powerhouse in comparison. It boasts a superior AMOLED display, a significantly more powerful processor, a much better main camera, and 4K video recording. It also provides Hi-Res audio, a wide-angle camera, reverse charging, and a higher storage capacity option. It gives a much better user experience.

User Experience: The Poco M5s will feel much more responsive and fluid, particularly with its higher refresh rate and processor performance. The AMOLED screen provides a much better viewing experience for media and gaming. The camera capabilities on the Poco M5s are notably better, especially in low light and for video recording.

Trade-offs: The Oppo's trade-offs include a lower-resolution IPS screen, a less powerful chipset, and a significantly weaker camera system. On the other hand, the Poco only offers Bluetooth 5.0, compared to Oppo's 5.1 and has an ultrasonic virtual proximity sensor instead of a standard one.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Oppo A57 4G:

    • Ideal User: Someone looking for a basic smartphone for everyday tasks like browsing, texting, and calls, with a preference for a larger screen and basic camera needs.
    • Use Cases: Suitable for older adults or those who are not tech-savvy, requiring a straightforward phone with dependable battery life and basic photo capabilities.
    • Value: Good for those on a strict budget that just needs the basics and will keep the phone for a long time due to the software updates.
  • Xiaomi Poco M5s:

    • Ideal User: Tech enthusiasts who enjoy media consumption, mobile gaming, and high-quality photography and videography. Users that will use the phone more regularly will also appreciate the better performance and screen.
    • Use Cases: Ideal for active social media users, gamers, and anyone who wants a versatile device capable of handling more demanding tasks. It's also suitable for content creators who value 4K video.
    • Value: Provides a lot more performance and features for its price, making it excellent value for those that will use the added power and features.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Here are three practical questions to help users decide:

  1. How important is display quality to you?

    • If you prioritize vibrant colors, deep blacks, and sharp visuals, the Poco M5s’ AMOLED screen is the better choice.
    • If you are ok with a standard display, the Oppo’s IPS LCD is sufficient.
  2. How intensive is your usage?

    • If you engage in mobile gaming or require smooth multitasking, the Poco M5s's faster chipset is essential.
    • If your use is light, the Oppo may suffice.
  3. How critical are camera capabilities?

    • If you want high-resolution images, versatile video capabilities and overall a better camera, then the Poco M5s is vastly superior.
    • If your camera needs are very basic, you will be fine with the Oppo A57.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Budget User (Limited to Basic Functionality): If your budget is very constrained and you only need calls, texting and basic social media, and prefer a larger screen, then the Oppo A57 4G will be a sufficient choice.
  • Value Seeker (Balance of Features and Performance): If you want a better overall experience with a better screen and much faster performance, the Poco M5s will be the better choice by far.
  • Content Creator (High-Quality Photo and Video): For content creation, the Xiaomi Poco M5s is the only viable option between the two, due to its 4K video capabilities and the better camera sensors.

My Choice

If I were choosing between these two devices, I would choose the Xiaomi Poco M5s. Here’s why:

As a tech journalist, I value performance, display quality, and camera capabilities, all of which the Poco M5s provides in abundance. The AMOLED display and faster processor would make my day-to-day use much more enjoyable, and the camera system would allow me to capture and create high-quality content. While the Oppo A57 4G has its merits, the overall user experience offered by the Poco M5s is superior. The trade-offs with Bluetooth and a less common proximity sensor would not be worth saving the cost and would feel underperforming in real life, and the added benefits of the Poco are significant.

I hope this comprehensive comparison has been helpful! Let me know if you have any other questions!

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.