Oppo A57 4G vs Samsung Galaxy A04 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 6, 2022 October 10, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 98.22 cm³ 114.15 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.51 "/g 3.39 "/g
Weight 187 g 192 g
Height 163.7 mm 164.4 mm
Width 75 mm 76.3 mm
Thickness 8 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Glowing Black
  • Glowing Green
  • Black
  • White
  • Green
  • Copper

Display

Screen Size 6.56 " 6.5 "
Resolution 720 x 1612 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.2 % 81.3 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A N/A
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 116.19 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.91 mAh/cm³ 43.8 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No No
Chipset Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 PowerVR GE8320

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 12
Maximum OS Version 14 13

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Oppo A57 4G and the Samsung Galaxy A04, dissecting their specifications and uncovering what they truly offer the everyday user.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureOppo A57 4GSamsung Galaxy A04Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)163.7 x 75 x 8164.4 x 76.3 x 9.1A04 slightly larger, thicker. Negligible in daily use.
Weight (g)187192A57 slightly lighter, but both are generally lightweight.
Display
Size (inches)6.566.5Virtually identical screen real estate.
Resolution (px)720 x 1612720 x 1600Minimal difference in sharpness; both are HD+ displays.
TypeIPS LCDPLS LCDSimilar visual quality; expect vibrant colors and decent viewing angles. PLS LCD generally offers slightly better outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetHelio G35Helio P35Nearly identical performance; expect smooth basic tasks, but limitations in demanding games or multitasking.
CPUOcta-coreOcta-coreSame core configuration; performance differences will be negligible.
GPUPowerVR GE8320PowerVR GE8320Same GPU; comparable graphics performance.
RAM (GB)44Sufficient for basic tasks and moderate multitasking.
OSAndroid 12Android 12Both launch with the same OS version, though update longevity may vary. A57 has a higher maximum OS version, suggesting potentially longer software support.
Camera
Rear Camera13MP + 2MP50MP + 2MPA04 boasts higher megapixel count on the main sensor, potentially capturing more detail. Real-world image quality depends on processing and other factors.
Front Camera8MP5MPA57 likely offers better selfie quality.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Both offer excellent battery life, likely lasting a full day on a single charge.
Fast Charging33WNoneSignificant advantage for A57; much faster charging speeds.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance Parity: Both phones offer comparable performance for everyday tasks. Don't expect flagship-level speed, but they should handle web browsing, social media, and light gaming adequately.
  • Display Dilemma: Screen sizes and resolutions are nearly identical. The A57 uses IPS LCD while the A04 uses PLS LCD (Samsung's variant of IPS). Expect minor differences in color reproduction and brightness.
  • Camera Conundrum: The A04's 50MP main camera sensor might seem impressive, but megapixels don't tell the whole story. Image processing, lens quality, and software features play a crucial role. The A57's 8MP front camera is likely superior for selfies.
  • Charging Champion: The A57's 33W fast charging is a clear winner. This feature significantly reduces downtime, a major advantage in today's fast-paced world. The A04 lacks fast charging, a noticeable drawback.
  • Software Support: While both launch with Android 12, the A57 is stated to be upgradeable to Android 14, while the A04 only goes up to Android 13. This suggests Oppo might offer longer-term software updates for the A57.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Oppo A57 4G: Best suited for users who prioritize fast charging, potentially longer software updates, and a slightly lighter phone.
  • Samsung Galaxy A04: Appeals to budget-conscious users who value a reputable brand and can compromise on charging speed. The potentially superior main camera might also be a deciding factor for some.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • How important is fast charging? If quick top-ups are essential, the A57 is the clear choice.
  • Are you a heavy camera user? If photography is a priority, carefully consider real-world image comparisons beyond megapixel counts. The A04 might offer better detail in some scenarios, while the A57 potentially better selfies.
  • What's your budget? Compare prices in your region, as this could be a deciding factor given the similar performance and features.

My Choice: I would choose the Oppo A57 4G. The 33W fast charging is a game-changer for me, significantly impacting daily usability. While the A04's 50MP camera is intriguing, I prioritize the convenience of fast charging and the potential for longer software support indicated by the higher maximum OS version. The slightly lighter weight is a bonus. For me, the A57 offers a better balance of features and practicality.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.