Oppo A57 4G vs Realme C65 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C65
Realme C65
Realme

General

Launch Date June 6, 2022 April 1, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 98.22 cm³ 95.2 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.51 "/g 3.61 "/g
Weight 187 g 185 g
Height 163.7 mm 164.6 mm
Width 75 mm 76.1 mm
Thickness 8 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Glowing Black
  • Glowing Green
  • Purple Nebula
  • Black Milky Way

Display

Screen Size 6.56 " 6.67 "
Resolution 720 x 1612 720 x 1604
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.2 % 85.6 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 264 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 625 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 116.19 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.91 mAh/cm³ 52.52 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Oppo A57 4G and the Realme C65, dissecting their specifications and uncovering what they truly offer the everyday user.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureOppo A57 4GRealme C65Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)163.7 x 75 x 8164.6 x 76.1 x 7.6C65 slightly larger, but both are generally compact.
Weight (g)187185Negligible weight difference; both feel light in hand.
Display
Size (inches)6.566.67C65 offers a slightly larger screen for more immersive content.
Resolution720 x 1612720 x 1604Virtually identical; expect similar sharpness.
Refresh Rate (Hz)-90C65's 90Hz delivers smoother scrolling and animations. A noticeable advantage for daily use.
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth offer decent color reproduction but lack the deep blacks of AMOLED.
Performance
ChipsetHelio G35Helio G85G85 is more powerful, enabling faster app loading, multitasking, and potentially better gaming.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.3 GHz & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)C65's CPU architecture provides a performance edge.
GPUPowerVR GE8320Mali-G52 MC2G85's GPU offers improved graphics performance for gaming and demanding apps.
RAM4GB8GBC65's larger RAM enables smoother multitasking and handles more apps in the background.
Camera
Main Camera13MP50MPC65 boasts significantly higher resolution, potentially capturing more detail.
Front Camera8MP8MPSimilar front camera resolution; expect comparable selfie quality.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhIdentical battery capacity; expected similar longevity. Real-world usage will vary.
Fast Charging33W45WC65 charges faster, minimizing downtime.
Other
NFCNoYesC65 allows for contactless payments and data transfer. A significant advantage for some users.
OSAndroid 12Android 14C65 comes with a newer OS, offering potential feature and security updates for longer.

2. Key Insights

The Realme C65 offers a noticeable performance advantage thanks to its more powerful Helio G85 chipset, coupled with double the RAM (8GB) compared to the Oppo A57 4G. The C65 also shines with its 90Hz display refresh rate, delivering a smoother and more responsive user experience. In the camera department, the 50MP main sensor on the C65 has the potential to capture significantly more detail than the 13MP sensor on the A57 4G. Furthermore, the inclusion of NFC in the C65 and its more modern Android 14 OS provide additional functionality and future-proofing.

The Oppo A57 4G's strengths lie primarily in its affordability. While it might not boast the same raw power or feature set as the C65, it still offers a solid foundation for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and casual photography.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Oppo A57 4G: Best suited for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic smartphone functionality and reliability. Ideal for light users who primarily use their phones for calling, texting, and occasional web browsing.

  • Realme C65: A great option for users who value performance, a smooth display, and modern features like NFC. Suitable for gamers, multitaskers, and those who capture a lot of photos and videos.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • What is your budget? The A57 4G is the more budget-friendly option.
  • What are your primary phone usage patterns? Light users might find the A57 4G sufficient, while power users would appreciate the C65's performance.
  • Which features are essential to you? If NFC and a high refresh rate display are must-haves, the C65 is the clear winner.

My Choice: Realme C65

While the Oppo A57 4G offers a respectable entry-level experience, I would choose the Realme C65. The performance boost from the Helio G85 processor, coupled with the smoother 90Hz display and the inclusion of NFC, significantly enhances the daily user experience. These advantages, along with the more modern Android OS and faster charging, outweigh the slight price difference for me. As someone who values a responsive and feature-rich device, the C65 aligns better with my personal preferences and usage patterns. The 50MP camera, while not the sole deciding factor, also offers the potential for significantly improved image quality. In the long run, I believe the C65 represents a better value proposition due to its superior performance, features, and longevity.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.