Oppo A55 vs TCL 40 SE - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Oppo A55
Oppo A55
Oppo
TCL 40 SE
TCL 40 SE
Tcl

General

Launch Date October 1, 2021 April 4, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 104.03 cm³ 109.18 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.37 "/g 3.55 "/g
Weight 193 g 190 g
Height 163.6 mm 167.9 mm
Width 75.7 mm 76.5 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Green
  • Starry Black
  • Rainbow Blue
  • Dark grey
  • Twilight purple

Display

Screen Size 6.51 " 6.75 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.6 % 85.6 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 480 nits 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 550 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.98 mAh/in² 109.96 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.06 mAh/cm³ 45.89 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5010 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) Mediatek MT6765 Helio G37 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 PowerVR GE8320

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a user-centered comparison of the Oppo A55 and the TCL 40 SE, moving beyond the raw specifications to understand how these devices translate into real-world experiences.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureOppo A55TCL 40 SEUser Experience Impact
Display6.51" IPS LCD (270 ppi)6.75" IPS LCD (260 ppi), 90HzTCL 40 SE offers a larger, smoother display, potentially enhancing media consumption and gaming.
OS & UIAndroid 11Android 13TCL 40 SE benefits from newer OS features, security updates, and potential UI/UX improvements.
Battery5000 mAh, 10W Charging5010 mAh, 18W ChargingTCL 40 SE provides faster charging, reducing downtime and increasing convenience for users.
ProcessorMediaTek Helio G35MediaTek Helio G37Negligible performance difference in everyday tasks.
Design Ergonomics193g, 8.4mm thick190g, 8.5mm thickSimilar feel in hand, though TCL 40 SE's larger screen might impact one-handed use for some.
PriceMediumLowTCL 40 SE offers greater value for its features, especially considering the larger display and newer OS.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a student using their phone for online classes, social media, and casual gaming.

  • Oppo A55: Provides a decent experience but might feel sluggish during multitasking or graphically demanding games. The smaller screen might also be less immersive for video content. Battery life is good, but slower charging can be inconvenient.

  • TCL 40 SE: The larger, 90Hz display makes online lectures easier to follow and enhances the gaming experience. Faster charging minimizes interruptions. Android 13 provides a more up-to-date software experience.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

Both devices cater to users seeking a balance of functionality and affordability. However:

  • Budget-conscious users: The TCL 40 SE provides exceptional value with its larger display, faster charging, and newer OS for a lower price.

  • Users prioritizing software updates: The TCL 40 SE with Android 13 offers a longer software support lifespan.

  • One-handed usability: Users with smaller hands might find the Oppo A55 slightly more comfortable due to its smaller form factor.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

While both phones offer decent specifications, the TCL 40 SE provides a more compelling user experience due to its:

  • Immersive Display: Larger screen size and higher refresh rate significantly enhance media consumption and gaming.
  • Future-Proof Software: Android 13 ensures longer software support and access to newer features.
  • Faster Charging: Reduces downtime, a crucial factor in today's fast-paced world.
  • Value Proposition: Delivers a superior user experience at a lower price point.

My Choice: TCL 40 SE

As a technology communications specialist focused on user experience, I would choose the TCL 40 SE. It provides a more compelling overall package for the average user. The combination of a larger, smoother display, faster charging, newer Android OS, and lower price makes it a clear winner from a user-centric perspective. While minor differences in processing power exist, the noticeable improvements in daily usability offered by the TCL 40 SE outweigh the marginal performance gains of the Oppo A55. The TCL 40 SE better embodies the principles of intuitive and inclusive technology design, making it a more accessible and enjoyable device for a wider range of users. It's not just about specs; it's about how those specs translate into a meaningful user experience, and the TCL 40 SE excels in that regard.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.