Oppo A55 vs Samsung Galaxy A04e - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Oppo A55
Oppo A55
Oppo

General

Launch Date October 1, 2021 November 7, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 104.03 cm³ 113.41 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.37 "/g 3.46 "/g
Weight 193 g 188 g
Height 163.6 mm 164.2 mm
Width 75.7 mm 75.9 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Green
  • Starry Black
  • Rainbow Blue
  • Black
  • Light Blue
  • Copper

Display

Screen Size 6.51 " 6.5 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.6 % 81.8 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A N/A
Typical Brightness 480 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 550 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.98 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.06 mAh/cm³ 44.09 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 PowerVR GE8320

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Oppo A55 vs. Samsung Galaxy A04e: A User-Centered Comparison

Let's move beyond the numbers and delve into the real-world experience of using the Oppo A55 and Samsung Galaxy A04e. My analysis prioritizes how design choices translate into meaningful interactions for you, the user.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureOppo A55Samsung Galaxy A04eUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignColorOS 11 (based on Android 11)One UI Core 4.1 (based on Android 12)A04e offers a potentially more modern interface with updated Android features.
Display6.51" IPS LCD, 270 ppi6.5" PLS LCD, 270 ppiVirtually identical display quality; minimal difference in user experience.
BiometricsSide-mounted Fingerprint SensorNo fingerprint sensorA55 provides significantly enhanced security and convenient unlocking.
ConnectivityNFC EnabledNo NFCA55 allows for contactless payments and data transfer, expanding usability in daily life.
Design Ergonomics193g, 8.4mm thick188g, 9.1mm thickA04e is slightly lighter, but A55 is thinner; subjective preference will determine comfort.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine you're at a bustling farmer's market. With the Oppo A55's NFC, you can quickly tap your phone to pay for fresh produce, leaving your wallet tucked away safely. The A04e lacks NFC, requiring you to fumble for cash or cards, potentially slowing down the line and disrupting the flow. This small feature significantly impacts the ease and speed of your transaction.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • Tech-Savvy User: The A55's NFC and slightly faster processor might appeal to users who prioritize seamless transactions and quick app loading.
  • Budget-Conscious User: The A04e's lower price point makes it an attractive option for those seeking basic smartphone functionality.
  • Accessibility Needs: Both devices offer standard accessibility features within their respective Android versions. However, the A55's fingerprint sensor could be advantageous for users with dexterity challenges.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The Oppo A55 demonstrates a design philosophy that prioritizes practical features and modern conveniences, such as NFC for contactless payments. The Samsung Galaxy A04e, on the other hand, focuses on delivering essential smartphone capabilities at an extremely affordable price point, potentially sacrificing some convenient features.

My Choice: The Oppo A55

While the Samsung Galaxy A04e offers excellent value for its price, the Oppo A55's inclusion of NFC, a fingerprint sensor, and a slightly more powerful processor significantly enhances the overall user experience. These features contribute to a more seamless, secure, and convenient daily interaction with the device. For me, these usability advantages outweigh the marginal price difference. The A55 better embodies my philosophy of user-centered design, making technology more accessible and enjoyable for a wider range of users.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.