Oppo A55 vs Samsung Galaxy A03 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Oppo A55
Oppo A55
Oppo

General

Launch Date October 1, 2021 January 21, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 104.03 cm³ 113.41 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.37 "/g 3.32 "/g
Weight 193 g 196 g
Height 163.6 mm 164.2 mm
Width 75.7 mm 75.9 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Green
  • Starry Black
  • Rainbow Blue
  • Black
  • Red
  • Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.51 " 6.5 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.6 % 81.8 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A N/A
Typical Brightness 480 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 550 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.98 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.06 mAh/cm³ 44.09 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG microUSB 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 11
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Oppo A55 vs. Samsung Galaxy A03: A User-Centered Comparison

Let's dive beyond the spec sheet and explore the Oppo A55 and Samsung Galaxy A03 as complete user experiences, focusing on how design choices translate into real-world usability for diverse individuals.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureOppo A55Samsung Galaxy A03User Experience Impact
Interface DesignColorOS 11.1 (based on Android 11)One UI Core 3.1 (based on Android 11)Both offer customizable interfaces, but One UI Core is known for its simplicity and ease of use, especially for novice users.
Interaction FlowSmooth, thanks to the Helio G35 chipsetCan feel sluggish due to the Unisoc T606A smoother interaction flow contributes significantly to a more enjoyable and frustration-free user experience.
AccessibilitySide-mounted fingerprint sensor, NFCRear-mounted fingerprint sensor, No NFCSide-mounted fingerprint sensors are often more ergonomically accessible. NFC enables convenient contactless transactions.
Design ErgonomicsSlimmer (8.4mm) and lighter (193g)Thicker (9.1mm) and slightly heavier (196g)A slimmer and lighter phone generally provides a more comfortable and portable user experience.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a student using their phone for note-taking, mobile payments, and staying connected with friends.

  • Oppo A55: The student effortlessly unlocks their phone with a touch of the side-mounted fingerprint sensor while rushing between classes. They quickly tap their phone to pay for lunch using NFC, saving precious time. The slim design easily slips into their pocket.
  • Samsung Galaxy A03: The student fumbles to reach the rear-mounted fingerprint sensor. They need to pull out their wallet to pay, adding extra steps. The slightly bulkier phone feels less comfortable in their pocket.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • For tech-savvy users: The Oppo A55's NFC capability and slightly faster processor might be appealing.
  • For less tech-savvy users: The Samsung Galaxy A03's simplified One UI Core might offer a gentler learning curve. The lack of NFC might not be a deal breaker for all users.
  • For users with accessibility needs: The side-mounted fingerprint sensor on the Oppo A55 provides easier access compared to the rear-mounted sensor on the A03.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

While both phones offer comparable features at a similar price point, the design choices significantly impact the overall user experience. The Oppo A55 prioritizes a smoother performance, convenient features like NFC, and a more ergonomic design. The Samsung Galaxy A03 emphasizes software simplicity with One UI Core.

My Choice: The Oppo A55

As a technology communications specialist prioritizing user-centered design, I would choose the Oppo A55. While the Samsung A03 offers a simplified interface, the A55 provides a more holistic and enjoyable user experience. The smoother performance, NFC for contactless payments, the more accessible fingerprint sensor location, and slimmer design contribute to a more convenient and enjoyable daily interaction. These design elements align better with a user-centered approach, creating a device that seamlessly integrates into diverse lifestyles. The slightly faster processor contributes to a smoother user experience which, in my opinion, outweighs the software simplicity offered by the Samsung Galaxy A03.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.