Oppo A55 vs Realme C31 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Oppo A55
Oppo A55
Oppo
Realme C31
Realme C31
Realme

General

Launch Date October 1, 2021 March 31, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 104.03 cm³ 105.28 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.37 "/g 3.3 "/g
Weight 193 g 197 g
Height 163.6 mm 164.7 mm
Width 75.7 mm 76.1 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Green
  • Starry Black
  • Rainbow Blue
  • Light Silver
  • Dark Green

Display

Screen Size 6.51 " 6.5 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.6 % 81.4 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A N/A
Typical Brightness 480 nits 400 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 550 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.98 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.06 mAh/cm³ 47.49 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G57

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG microUSB 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 11
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a user-centered comparison of the Oppo A55 and Realme C31, moving beyond the raw specifications to understand how these devices translate into real-world experiences.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureOppo A55Realme C31User Experience Impact
Interface DesignColorOS 11.1 (based on Android 11)Realme UI R Edition (Android 11)Oppo potentially offers a more feature-rich, albeit potentially more complex, software experience.
Interaction FlowPotentially smoother due to slightly better GPUPotentially less smoothImpacts app responsiveness, gaming performance, and overall feeling of fluidity.
AccessibilityNFC enabledNo NFCOppo allows for contactless payments and data transfer, expanding usability.
Design ErgonomicsSlightly lighter (193g)Slightly heavier (197g)Noticeable difference in hand feel, especially during prolonged use.
Charging PortUSB Type-CmicroUSBOppo offers faster data transfer and more versatile charging cable compatibility.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a busy student, Sarah, who relies on her phone for everything from note-taking to mobile payments.

  • Oppo A55: Sarah effortlessly taps her phone to pay for her coffee using NFC, then quickly transfers lecture notes to her laptop via the USB Type-C port. The smoother interface ensures a fluid note-taking experience during fast-paced lectures.

  • Realme C31: Sarah fumbles for her wallet, as her phone lacks NFC. Transferring files to her laptop is slower due to the microUSB port. The slightly less powerful processor occasionally leads to lag when switching between multiple apps.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • Tech-Savvy User: May prefer the Oppo A55 for its NFC, USB Type-C, and potentially smoother performance due to a slightly better GPU..
  • Budget-Conscious User: Might lean towards the Realme C31 if price is the primary concern, accepting compromises on certain features.
  • User with Accessibility Needs: NFC on the Oppo A55 could be crucial for individuals relying on contactless transactions for ease of use.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Beyond specifications, the choice boils down to prioritizing seamless user experience versus budget constraints. The Oppo A55 invests in modern conveniences like NFC and USB Type-C, contributing to a more fluid and versatile user experience. The Realme C31 offers a more basic experience, potentially appealing to users seeking affordability over feature richness.

My Choice: As Sophia Rodriguez, I would choose the Oppo A55. While the Realme C31 offers a competitive price point, the Oppo A55's inclusion of NFC, a more modern USB Type-C port, and potentially smoother performance aligns better with my focus on user-centered design and a seamless, versatile mobile experience. These features, in my view, significantly enhance daily usability and contribute to a more future-proof device, outweighing the slight price difference. The seemingly minor details like charging port and NFC contribute significantly to the overall user experience in the long run, aligning with my philosophy of advocating for intuitive and inclusive technology design.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.