Oppo A55 vs OnePlus Nord N20 SE - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Oppo A55
Oppo A55
Oppo

General

Launch Date October 1, 2021 August 8, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 104.03 cm³ 98.28 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.37 "/g 3.51 "/g
Weight 193 g 187 g
Height 163.6 mm 163.8 mm
Width 75.7 mm 75 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Green
  • Starry Black
  • Rainbow Blue
  • Blue Oasis
  • Celestial Black

Display

Screen Size 6.51 " 6.56 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.6 % 84.2 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 269 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A N/A
Typical Brightness 480 nits 480 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 600 nits
Peak Brightness 550 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.98 mAh/in² 116.19 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.06 mAh/cm³ 50.88 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 PowerVR GE8320

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Oppo A55 vs. OnePlus Nord N20 SE: A User-Centered Comparison

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones beyond the raw numbers. Let's delve into a narrative-driven analysis, focusing on how design choices translate into real-world user experiences.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureOppo A55OnePlus Nord N20 SEUser Experience Impact
Interface DesignColorOS 11.1 (Based on Android 11)OxygenOS 12 (Based on Android 12)OxygenOS generally offers a cleaner, closer-to-stock Android experience. ColorOS has improved but can feel more customized.
Display6.51" IPS LCD (720 x 1600)6.56" IPS LCD (720 x 1612)Negligible difference in screen size and resolution. Both offer decent displays for everyday use.
Ergonomics193g, 8.4mm thick187g, 8.0mm thickNord N20 SE is slightly lighter and thinner, potentially offering a more comfortable grip.
AccessibilityStandard Android 11 Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android 12 Accessibility FeaturesAndroid 12 offers slightly more refined accessibility options.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a student using their phone for note-taking, social media, and casual gaming.

  • Oppo A55: Offers a large battery (5000mAh) ensuring all-day usage without constant charging. The side-mounted fingerprint sensor provides quick and convenient unlocking. NFC enables contactless payments for quick cafeteria purchases.
  • OnePlus Nord N20 SE: While sharing the same large battery, the faster 33W charging means less downtime plugged in. The slightly improved Bluetooth 5.3 ensures better connectivity with wireless earbuds for studying or listening to music on the go.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

Both phones cater to budget-conscious users seeking essential smartphone features. However:

  • For users prioritizing software updates: The Nord N20 SE, launching with Android 12, potentially offers a longer software support lifespan, crucial for security and new features.
  • For users relying on NFC: The Oppo A55's inclusion of NFC makes it a more versatile option for contactless transactions.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

While specifications are similar, subtle design differences influence the overall user experience. The Nord N20 SE's slightly refined design, newer Android version, and faster charging might appeal to users prioritizing modern features and a cleaner software experience. The Oppo A55's NFC capability and comparable performance make it a strong contender for users seeking practical functionality.

My Choice:

I would choose the OnePlus Nord N20 SE. While the Oppo A55 offers NFC, a feature I value, the Nord N20 SE's advantages in software (Android 12 and potentially longer updates), faster charging (33W vs 10W – a significant difference in daily use), and slightly more refined design make it a more compelling overall package for me. The marginally lighter and thinner build enhances the in-hand feel, contributing to a more enjoyable user experience. In my user-centric analysis, these factors outweigh the benefit of NFC in this particular comparison, as mobile payment alternatives are readily available. The Nord N20 SE offers a better long-term value proposition due to the software advantage, and the faster charging significantly improves the daily usability and reduces downtime.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.