Oppo A55 vs Nokia C31 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Oppo A55
Oppo A55
Oppo
Nokia C31
Nokia C31
Nokia

General

Launch Date October 1, 2021 September 1, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 104.03 cm³ 113.5 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.37 "/g 3.38 "/g
Weight 193 g 200 g
Height 163.6 mm 169.2 mm
Width 75.7 mm 78 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Green
  • Starry Black
  • Rainbow Blue
  • Mint
  • Charcoal
  • Cyan

Display

Screen Size 6.51 " 6.75 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.6 % 83.4 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A N/A
Typical Brightness 480 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 550 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.98 mAh/in² 110.84 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.06 mAh/cm³ 44.49 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5050 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 IMG8322

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG microUSB 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a user-centered comparison of the Oppo A55 and Nokia C31, moving beyond mere specs to understand their impact on everyday experiences.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureOppo A55Nokia C31User Experience Impact
Interface DesignColorOS 11.1 (based on Android 11)Stock Android 12Oppo's skin offers customization, but Stock Android might feel cleaner and faster.
Interaction FlowPotentially smoother due to slightly better CPUPotentially less smooth due to older chipsetImpacts app loading times, multitasking, and overall responsiveness.
AccessibilityStandard Android 11 accessibility featuresStandard Android 12 accessibility featuresBoth offer basic accessibility, but Android 12 may have newer, more robust options.
Design ErgonomicsLighter (193g)Heavier (200g), LargerOppo A55 might be more comfortable for one-handed use.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a student using their phone for online classes, social media, and casual gaming.

  • Oppo A55: The student appreciates the slightly faster processor for smoother transitions between apps and less lag during video calls. The vibrant colors and customization options of ColorOS add a personal touch. However, the smaller battery might require more frequent charging throughout the day.

  • Nokia C31: The larger screen of the Nokia C31 provides a more immersive experience for watching lectures and browsing social media. The stock Android experience ensures a clean interface with fewer pre-installed apps. The slightly larger battery offers a bit more longevity, but the less powerful processor might result in occasional sluggishness.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • For a Tech-Savvy User: The Oppo A55's NFC capability for contactless payments and potentially faster performance might be appealing.

  • For a Senior Citizen: The Nokia C31's larger display and simpler stock Android interface could be easier to navigate. The longer battery life also reduces charging anxiety.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Prioritize:

  • Performance and Features: Oppo A55
  • Simplicity and Battery Life: Nokia C31

Intuitive Comparison:

  • Think "Fast and Customizable" for Oppo A55.
  • Think "Simple and Long-Lasting" for Nokia C31.

My Choice: Oppo A55

While the Nokia C31 offers a larger display and slightly longer battery life, I would choose the Oppo A55. As a technology communicator focused on user experience, I value the smoother performance offered by the slightly more powerful processor and the added convenience of NFC for mobile payments. The weight difference, while subtle, also contributes to a more comfortable handheld experience, which is crucial for extended use. Though ColorOS adds a layer of customization, I find that it generally doesn't hinder the user experience significantly and can even enhance it for users who enjoy personalization. The faster processor translates to a more responsive and enjoyable interaction with the device, aligning better with my need for seamless multitasking and quick access to information.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.