Oppo A55 vs Motorola Moto E22 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Oppo A55
Oppo A55
Oppo

General

Launch Date October 1, 2021 October 11, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 104.03 cm³ 97.77 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.37 "/g 3.85 "/g
Weight 193 g 169 g
Height 163.6 mm 163.6 mm
Width 75.7 mm 74.7 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Green
  • Starry Black
  • Rainbow Blue
  • Crystal Blue
  • Astro Black

Display

Screen Size 6.51 " 6.5 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.6 % 83.5 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 480 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 550 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.98 mAh/in² 95.15 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.06 mAh/cm³ 41.12 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4020 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) Mediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 PowerVR GE8320

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a user-centered comparison of the Oppo A55 and the Motorola Moto E22, transforming technical specifications into meaningful user experiences.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureOppo A55Motorola Moto E22User Experience Impact
Interface DesignColorOS 11.1 (based on Android 11)My UX (based on Android 12)Moto E22 offers a potentially cleaner, more modern Android experience.
Interaction FlowStandard Android navigationStandard Android navigation with 90Hz refresh rateMoto E22's 90Hz display provides a smoother, more responsive feel.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android accessibility optionsStandard Android accessibility optionsBoth devices offer similar accessibility features.
Design Ergonomics193g, 8.4mm thick169g, 8.0mm thickMoto E22 is slightly lighter and thinner, potentially more comfortable for extended use.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a student using their phone for online classes, social media, and casual gaming.

  • Oppo A55: The larger 5000mAh battery ensures they can attend a full day of online lectures without worrying about charging. The triple rear camera system, while not groundbreaking, allows for decent everyday photos.
  • Moto E22: The 90Hz refresh rate makes scrolling through social media feeds and playing casual games feel noticeably smoother. The lighter weight makes it easier to hold during long study sessions. However, the smaller battery might require charging during the day.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • For a budget-conscious user: Both phones offer decent value, but the Moto E22's lower price point might be more appealing.
  • For a power user: Neither phone excels in performance-intensive tasks, but the Oppo A55's larger battery offers an advantage for extended use.
  • For an older adult: Both phones have simple interfaces, but the Moto E22's lighter weight might be preferable for those with dexterity issues.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

While both phones offer similar functionality, the design choices cater to different user priorities:

  • Choose Oppo A55 if: Battery life is paramount.
  • Choose Moto E22 if: A smoother display and lighter weight are more important. A more updated Android OS is preferred.

My Choice: As Sophia Rodriguez, prioritizing user experience, I would choose the Motorola Moto E22.

Why? While the Oppo A55 boasts a larger battery, the Moto E22's 90Hz refresh rate significantly impacts daily interaction, making the overall experience feel more fluid and responsive. This aligns with my focus on design choices that enhance user engagement. The lighter weight and slimmer profile contribute to improved ergonomics, crucial for comfortable extended use. Furthermore, the more recent Android OS on the Moto E22 suggests a potentially longer software support lifecycle, a key factor in the overall user experience over time. Although the battery is smaller, portable chargers are readily available and, for me, the smoother display and more updated OS outweigh the battery size difference. This decision reflects a holistic view of user experience, prioritizing features that create a more enjoyable and engaging interaction with the device.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.