Oppo A54s vs Samsung Galaxy M35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Oppo A54s
Oppo A54s
Oppo

General

Launch Date November 18, 2021 May 24, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 104.02 cm³ 116.09 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.43 "/g 2.97 "/g
Weight 190 g 222 g
Height 163.8 mm 162.3 mm
Width 75.6 mm 78.6 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Space Silver
  • Pearl Blue
  • Crystal Black
  • Gray
  • Light Blue
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.52 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 83.8 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 480 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.62 mAh/in² 137.74 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.07 mAh/cm³ 51.69 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

The Tale of Two Phones: Oppo A54s vs. Samsung Galaxy M35

Let's embark on a journey to explore two mobile devices, not just as collections of specs, but as gateways to experiences. We'll delve into the Oppo A54s and Samsung Galaxy M35, unraveling their design philosophies and how they translate into real-world use.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureOppo A54sSamsung Galaxy M35User Experience Impact
Interface DesignColorOS 11 (Android 11)One UI 5.1 (Android 14)M35 offers a more modern, feature-rich interface with likely better long-term support.
Display6.52" IPS LCD (720x1600)6.6" Super AMOLED (1080x2340), 120HzM35 boasts a significantly sharper, brighter, and smoother display for a more immersive visual experience.
Interaction FlowStandard Android experience with Oppo customizationsSamsung's refined One UI experienceM35 likely offers a more intuitive and customized user experience.
Accessibility FeaturesBasic Android accessibility optionsEnhanced One UI accessibility featuresM35 potentially provides a more inclusive experience for users with diverse needs.
Design Ergonomics190g, 8.4mm thick222g, 9.1mm thickA54s is lighter and slimmer, potentially more comfortable for extended use. However, the M35's larger battery might be worth the extra weight for some users.
PerformanceHelio G35, 4GB RAMExynos 1380, 8GB RAMM35 provides significantly more powerful performance for demanding tasks and smoother multitasking.
Camera50MP Main, Triple Camera50MP Main with OIS, Triple CameraM35's inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) will result in clearer photos and videos, especially in low-light conditions. Its more advanced video recording capabilities offer greater creative flexibility.
Battery5000mAh6000mAh, 25W Fast ChargingM35 offers longer battery life and significantly faster charging, minimizing downtime.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Imagine a student using the A54s. They appreciate the lightweight design for carrying it around campus all day. However, when trying to capture a quick video of a guest lecturer, the lack of image stabilization results in shaky footage. Now, picture a content creator using the M35. The vibrant AMOLED screen brings their edits to life, and the powerful processor handles demanding video editing software with ease. The OIS ensures smooth, professional-looking footage, even while filming on the go.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

For a user prioritizing affordability and basic functionality, the A54s might suffice. However, for users with visual impairments, the M35's brighter and more customizable display could be crucial. Power users engaging in demanding tasks will appreciate the M35's superior performance and features.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The choice hinges on individual priorities. If budget and portability are paramount, the A54s presents a viable option. However, if a richer, more powerful, and future-proof experience is desired, the Samsung Galaxy M35 emerges as the clear winner. Its superior display, performance, camera capabilities, and larger battery provide a compelling user experience advantage.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy M35

As a technology communications specialist focusing on user experience, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M35. While the Oppo A54s offers a decent entry-level experience, the M35's overall package resonates more deeply with my principles. Its superior display, powerful performance, advanced camera features (especially OIS), larger battery with faster charging, and more modern software contribute to a significantly more satisfying and versatile user experience. These features translate into tangible benefits for a wider range of users and usage scenarios, making the M35 a more compelling and future-proof choice.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.