Oppo A54s vs Samsung Galaxy M13 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Oppo A54s
Oppo A54s
Oppo

General

Launch Date November 18, 2021 July 1, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 104.02 cm³ 106.84 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.43 "/g 3.44 "/g
Weight 190 g 192 g
Height 163.8 mm 165.4 mm
Width 75.6 mm 76.9 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Space Silver
  • Pearl Blue
  • Crystal Black
  • Light Blue
  • Deep Green
  • Orange Copper

Display

Screen Size 6.52 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2408
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 82.5 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 400 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A N/A
Typical Brightness 480 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.62 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.07 mAh/cm³ 46.8 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) Exynos 850 (8 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G52

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Oppo A54s vs. Samsung Galaxy M13: A User-Centered Comparison

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones through the lens of user experience, not just specs. Let's embark on a comparative journey!

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureOppo A54sSamsung Galaxy M13User Experience Impact
Interface DesignColorOS 11.1 (Android 11)One UI Core 4.1 (Android 12)Samsung offers a more modern OS with potential for longer software support.
Display6.52" IPS LCD (720x1600)6.6" PLS TFT (1080x2408)Galaxy M13 boasts a sharper, larger display, enhancing media consumption and overall clarity.
Interaction FlowStandard Android navigationSamsung's customized navigation optionsPotentially more personalized navigation on the M13.
AccessibilityStandard Android accessibility featuresOne UI accessibility featuresBoth offer basic accessibility, but Samsung might provide more advanced options.
Design Ergonomics190g, 8.4mm thick192g, 8.4mm thickNegligible difference in weight and thickness; both feel comfortable in hand.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a student using their phone for online classes and entertainment.

  • Oppo A54s: The large 5000 mAh battery ensures all-day learning without worrying about charging. The triple camera system, while basic, allows for decent photo documentation.
  • Samsung Galaxy M13: The higher resolution display brings lectures to life with sharper visuals. The Exynos 850 chipset offers better performance for multitasking between apps. The updated Android OS provides access to newer features and potentially better security.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • For budget-conscious users: Both phones offer excellent value. However, the M13's superior display and performance make it a more future-proof choice.
  • For older adults: Both phones have large screens and simple interfaces, but Samsung's One UI might be slightly easier to navigate due to its customization options.
  • For students: The M13's sharper display and better performance are advantageous for academic tasks and entertainment.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

While both phones cater to budget-conscious users, the Samsung Galaxy M13 exhibits a more refined design philosophy. Its higher-resolution display significantly impacts the user experience, making media consumption and daily tasks more enjoyable. The updated OS offers potential advantages in performance, features, and long-term software support.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy M13

The Galaxy M13's superior display, coupled with its more recent processor and software, makes it a more compelling device for the long term. Although the Oppo A54s boasts a solid battery and decent features, the M13 offers a noticeable upgrade in crucial aspects of daily use. The sharper visuals and smoother performance contribute to a more engaging and enjoyable user experience, aligning with my design-centric approach to mobile technology. Furthermore, the potential for longer software updates ensures a more future-proof investment. While the price difference might exist, the value proposition of the M13, in terms of user experience, makes it the winner in this comparison.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.