Oppo A54s vs Samsung Galaxy A35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Oppo A54s
Oppo A54s
Oppo

General

Launch Date November 18, 2021 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 104.02 cm³ 103.42 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.43 "/g 3.16 "/g
Weight 190 g 209 g
Height 163.8 mm 161.7 mm
Width 75.6 mm 78 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Space Silver
  • Pearl Blue
  • Crystal Black
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.52 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 84.8 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 480 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.62 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.07 mAh/cm³ 48.34 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

Oppo A54s vs. Samsung Galaxy A35: A User-Centered Comparison

Let's dive beyond the spec sheet and explore the Oppo A54s and Samsung Galaxy A35 as complete user experiences, focusing on how their design and features translate into real-world usability for diverse individuals.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureOppo A54sSamsung Galaxy A35User Experience Impact
Interface DesignIPS LCD, 720 x 1600 pxSuper AMOLED, 1080 x 2340 px, 120HzThe Galaxy A35 boasts a significantly sharper, more vibrant display with smoother scrolling thanks to the higher refresh rate.
Interaction FlowAndroid 11Android 14A35 offers the latest Android version with potential performance and feature enhancements.
Accessibility FeaturesFingerprint (side-mounted)Fingerprint (under display)Both offer biometric security; under-display fingerprint scanners often feel more modern and integrated into the overall design.
Design Ergonomics190g, 8.4mm thick209g, 8.2mm thickWhile slightly heavier, the A35 is marginally thinner. Weight difference might be noticeable for some users during prolonged use.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a student using their phone for online classes, social media, and casual photography.

  • Oppo A54s: The large 5000 mAh battery ensures all-day use without constant charging anxiety. The triple camera system, while basic, allows for capturing everyday moments. However, the lower resolution display might hinder the clarity of online learning materials.

  • Samsung Galaxy A35: The vibrant Super AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate brings online lectures and social media feeds to life. The smoother scrolling enhances the overall experience. The improved camera system with optical stabilization enables capturing clearer, more stable photos and videos.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • For a budget-conscious user: The Oppo A54s offers excellent battery life and essential features at a more affordable price point.

  • For a user prioritizing visual experience: The Galaxy A35's superior display and camera make it a compelling choice for media consumption and content creation.

  • For a user who values the latest software: The A35's newer Android version ensures access to the latest features and security updates.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

The Oppo A54s prioritizes practicality with its long-lasting battery and affordability. The Samsung Galaxy A35, on the other hand, emphasizes a richer, more engaging user experience through its superior display, performance, and camera.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A35

While the Oppo A54s offers great value, the Samsung Galaxy A35 provides a more compelling overall user experience. The vibrant Super AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, the more powerful processor and newer Android OS, and the enhanced camera capabilities significantly elevate daily interactions. The slightly higher price is justified by the noticeable improvements in visual quality, performance, and user experience. In the long run, these factors contribute to a more enjoyable and productive mobile experience. This aligns with my philosophy of prioritizing user-centered design and long-term value.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.