Oppo A54s vs Huawei Mate X3 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Oppo A54s
Oppo A54s
Oppo

General

Launch Date November 18, 2021 April 8, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 104.02 cm³ 117.67 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.43 "/g 3.28 "/g
Weight 190 g 239 g
Height 163.8 mm 156.9 mm
Width 75.6 mm 141.5 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 5.3 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Space Silver
  • Pearl Blue
  • Crystal Black
  • Gold
  • Black
  • White
  • Violet
  • Dark Green

Display

Screen Size 6.52 " 7.85 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 2224 x 2496
Aspect Ratio 20:9 16:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 88.9 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 426 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 480 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 117.62 mAh/in² 77.89 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.07 mAh/cm³ 40.79 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4800 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 4G (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.1
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version N/A 1.2
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, DisplayPort 1.2

Software

Operating System Android N/A
Initial OS Version 11 N/A
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Oppo A54s vs. Huawei Mate X3: A Tale of Two Technologies

As a technology communications specialist, my goal isn't just to compare specs, but to weave a narrative that reveals the soul of each device and how it resonates with the user. Let's embark on this journey with the Oppo A54s and the Huawei Mate X3.

1. Design and Usability Assessment

FeatureOppo A54sHuawei Mate X3User Experience Impact
Interface DesignStandard Android skin, likely with customizationsCustomizable.Mate X3 offers potential for personalization, catering to individual preferences.
Interaction FlowTraditional smartphone navigationFoldable design introduces new interaction paradigms, split-screen multitasking, flex mode.Mate X3's foldable design drastically alters workflow, enabling innovative multitasking and content consumption.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android accessibility optionsLikely includes advanced accessibility features leveraging foldable design.Mate X3 may offer enhanced accessibility due to its form factor, potentially benefiting users with specific needs.
Design ErgonomicsClassic smartphone form factor, familiar and comfortable for most users.Slim and lightweight when folded, larger screen when unfolded; requires careful handling due to foldable design.A54s offers familiarity; Mate X3 offers expanded screen real estate but with added fragility concerns.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration

Scenario: Imagine a student using both phones. With the A54s, they efficiently manage daily tasks – emails, social media, note-taking. It's a reliable companion for everyday communication. The Mate X3 transforms their learning experience. Unfolded, it becomes a mini-tablet for immersive research and reading. Split-screen multitasking allows simultaneous note-taking and video lectures.

Design Choice Impact: The A54s prioritizes simplicity and affordability. The Mate X3 embraces innovation, pushing the boundaries of mobile technology with its foldable design. This choice directly impacts how users interact with information and perform tasks.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation

Diverse User Needs:

  • Budget-conscious user: The A54s provides excellent value for its price, offering essential features without breaking the bank.
  • Power user: The Mate X3 caters to those who demand cutting-edge technology and innovative functionalities, prioritizing performance and multitasking capabilities.
  • User with accessibility needs: Both devices likely offer standard accessibility features. However, the Mate X3's foldable design might present unique advantages for certain users, such as those with limited mobility who benefit from a larger screen.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework

Beyond Specifications: Choosing between these devices goes beyond comparing numbers. It's about understanding your individual needs and priorities. Do you value affordability and simplicity or innovation and cutting-edge technology?

My Choice:

While I appreciate the innovative design of the Huawei Mate X3, I would choose the Oppo A54s. My decision is grounded in the principles of user-centered design and practicality.

Reasons:

  • Affordability: The A54s offers excellent value, making technology accessible to a wider audience. As a technology communicator, I believe in democratizing access to quality devices.
  • Reliability: The classic smartphone design is proven and reliable. While foldable technology is exciting, it introduces potential points of failure and requires more careful handling. I prioritize robustness for everyday use.
  • Simplicity: The A54s focuses on core functionalities, providing a user-friendly experience without unnecessary complexity. I believe in technology that simplifies life, not complicates it.
  • Sustainability: Choosing a more affordable device often translates to a longer usage cycle, contributing to a more sustainable approach to technology consumption. I advocate for conscious technology choices.

The Mate X3 is undoubtedly a technological marvel, but for my personal needs and values, the Oppo A54s strikes a more harmonious balance between functionality, affordability, and user experience. It embodies the spirit of inclusive technology – accessible, reliable, and designed for real-world use.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.