1. Specifications Comparison
Feature | Oppo A54 5G | ZTE Blade A75 4G | Practical Impact |
---|---|---|---|
Design | |||
Dimensions | 162.9 × 74.7 × 8.4 mm | 164.1 × 75.8 × 8.6 mm | The ZTE is slightly taller and wider, but the difference in size is minimal and probably won't be noticeable. |
Weight | 190g | 189g | Negligible difference; both phones will feel similar in hand. |
Display | |||
Size | 6.5" | 6.6" | Both offer similar screen real-estate, a slight difference of 0.1 inches is not noticeable. |
Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1612 | The Oppo has a significantly sharper display; text and images will appear much clearer. |
PPI | 405 | 267 | The Oppo will have noticeably sharper text and images than the ZTE due to higher pixel density. |
Technology | IPS LCD | IPS LCD | Both offer similar color accuracy and viewing angles. |
Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 90Hz | Both provide smoother scrolling and animations compared to 60Hz displays. |
Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Brightness is unknown and is not suitable for comparison. |
Performance | |||
Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | The Snapdragon chip is generally more efficient. Although the Antutu scores suggest that ZTE has a slight advantage, the real world use might prove otherwise. |
Antutu Score | 216,504 | 240,000 | ZTE has a higher benchmark score, but the real world implications are unknown. |
GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MP1 | The Adreno GPU is generally better for gaming, but we can't say for certain which will provide better gaming performance without real-world tests. |
Battery | |||
Capacity | 5000mAh | 5000mAh | Both will likely offer similar battery life, which should last a full day of moderate use. |
Charging | 18W fast charging, Li-Ion | 22.5W fast charging, Li-Polymer | The ZTE should charge slightly faster. |
Charging Features | Inbox charger 10W | Non-removable | Oppo A54 5G comes with a 10W inbox charger. |
Camera | |||
Standard Camera | 48MP, f/1.7, 1/2" sensor, 0.8µm pixels (Oppo) | 50MP, f/1.8 (ZTE) | Oppo has a wider aperture and larger sensor, and should offer superior low-light performance even though it has 2MP less than ZTE. |
Selfie Camera | 16MP, f/2.0, 1/3.13" sensor, 1.0µm pixels | 8MP | Oppo should produce clearer, more detailed selfies. |
Wide Angle Lens | 8MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm pixels (Oppo) | None | The Oppo offers a wide-angle lens, allowing for more versatile photos. |
Macro Lens | 2MP, f/2.4, 1.75µm pixels (Oppo) | None | The Oppo has a macro lens for close-up photography. |
Black & White Lens | 2MP, f/2.4, 1.75µm pixels (Oppo) | None | The Oppo has a monochrome sensor for better black-and-white photos. |
Video | 1080p@30fps with EIS, Slow-motion: Yes, 120 fps (Oppo) | 1080p@30fps, Slow-motion: No, 30 fps (ZTE) | Oppo allows for smoother, slower slow-motion videos. |
Features | Quadruple camera, more features (Oppo) | Dual camera, fewer features (ZTE) | Oppo offers more flexibility due to the additional cameras. |
Software | |||
OS | Android 11 | Android 13 | The ZTE runs a newer version of Android, providing access to the latest features and security updates. |
Connectivity | |||
WiFi | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi MiMO (Oppo) | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac (ZTE) | Both support dual-band WiFi. Oppo additionally supports Wi-Fi MiMO. |
Bluetooth | 5.1 LE, APT-x, LDAC, SBC, AAC (Oppo) | 5.0 LE (ZTE) | Oppo has a newer Bluetooth version with more audio codecs. |
GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo (Oppo) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo (ZTE) | Oppo has more satellite support, which could mean faster and more accurate location tracking. |
SIM | Dual SIM, Dual Standby | Dual SIM, Dual Standby | Both can use two SIM cards and remain on standby, but not simultaneously on calls. |
Storage | |||
Internal | 64/128/256 GB (Oppo) | 128/256 GB (ZTE) | Both are available with sufficient storage. |
RAM | 4/8 GB | 4/8 GB | Both are available with sufficient RAM. |
Expandable Storage | No | No | Neither supports microSD card expansion. |
Audio | |||
Quality | Basic audio features | DTS/DTS X | The ZTE offers more advanced audio features, providing a more immersive experience. |
Security | |||
Features | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor | Both have basic biometric security. |
Sensors | |||
Sensors | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope (Oppo) | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Gyroscope (ZTE) | Oppo has more features, suitable for gaming and advanced features. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Oppo A54 5G Advantages:
- Sharper Display: Higher resolution (1080x2400) and pixel density (405 PPI) provide a noticeably clearer and more detailed viewing experience.
- Versatile Camera System: Features a wide-angle, macro, and black & white lens, along with a better standard and selfie camera and more features.
- Superior Connectivity: Newer Bluetooth version (5.1) with advanced codecs and more comprehensive satellite GPS support.
- More sensors: The gyroscope, accelerometer, and compass, allows more versatile functionality in the phone
Practical Implications:
- The Oppo is better for users who prioritize a crisp display for media consumption and content creation.
- The Oppo's versatile camera is ideal for those who need more flexibility and options when taking photos.
- Better connectivity means better audio quality over bluetooth and more accurate GPS
- Better sensors means better functionality with other applications
ZTE Blade A75 4G Advantages:
- Newer Android OS: Runs Android 13, providing access to the latest features and security patches.
- Slightly Faster Charging: 22.5W charging should result in marginally faster charging times.
- DTS/DTS X Audio: Provides enhanced audio experience, improving sound quality for media consumption.
- Slightly Better Benchmark Score: Though, real world applications and their performance might prove otherwise.
Practical Implications:
- The ZTE is better for users who want the latest software and faster charging capabilities.
- Enhanced audio makes it a better option for immersive media consumption.
- The antutu score does not suggest a big difference in performance and shouldn't be a deciding factor.
Trade-offs:
- Oppo: Offers a better display, camera, and connectivity, but runs an older OS.
- ZTE: Provides a newer OS and faster charging but falls behind in display and camera quality.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Oppo A54 5G Ideal User:
- Users who prioritize display quality and want sharp and clear visuals for media consumption, browsing, and gaming.
- Users who value a flexible camera system with multiple lenses for various photo scenarios.
- Users who frequently use Bluetooth audio devices and need advanced audio codecs.
- Users who need more accurate location tracking via GPS and use it often
Use Cases:
- Watching videos and movies with a crisp and clear display.
- Taking diverse photos with different lenses and effects.
- Listening to music and podcasts with better audio quality via Bluetooth.
- Accurate GPS tracking for navigation, fitness, or geocaching.
- Gaming that requires accelerometer or gyroscope sensors for gameplay
ZTE Blade A75 4G Ideal User:
- Users who want the latest Android version with its features and security updates.
- Users who value slightly faster charging and battery optimization.
- Users who are heavy audio consumers that enjoy quality sound on their phone.
Use Cases:
- Staying up-to-date with the newest features and security on Android.
- Quickly charging their phone between activities.
- Listening to music, podcasts and videos with enhanced audio experience.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- How important is display quality for my usage (media, text, gaming)? If you prioritize a crisp display for media consumption, the Oppo A54 5G is the better choice.
- What camera capabilities do I need for my photography? The Oppo A54 5G offers a more flexible camera system with a wide-angle lens and macro lens and better photo quality, especially in low light.
- Do I need the latest Android version or are older versions acceptable? The ZTE Blade A75 4G provides the latest Android version, while the Oppo uses an older Android version.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Media Enthusiast: If you primarily watch videos, browse social media and play games, the Oppo A54 5G is better due to its superior display, camera and a more comprehensive sensor suite for gaming.
- Scenario 2: Everyday User: If you primarily use your phone for daily tasks like browsing, calls, and some social media, the ZTE Blade A75 4G provides a balance between features and a slightly more recent Android version.
- Scenario 3: Photography Enthusiast: If taking photos is a priority and you need different cameras and flexibility, the Oppo A54 5G is the better choice for it's better quality cameras and more options and modes to choose from.
My Choice and Why
I would choose the Oppo A54 5G.
While the ZTE Blade A75 4G offers a newer Android version and slightly faster charging, the Oppo A54 5G presents a more compelling package for my needs. Here's why:
- Superior Display: The significantly higher resolution and pixel density of the Oppo's screen would make a noticeable difference in my daily use, especially for media consumption, reading and browsing.
- Versatile Camera: I value a good and versatile camera system for taking photos in different scenarios. The inclusion of wide-angle, macro, and black and white lens on the Oppo gives me the extra flexibility that I need to take quality photos.
- Enhanced Connectivity: The more advanced Bluetooth version and better GPS support on the Oppo are important for a better audio experience when listening to music on bluetooth and precise GPS location tracking.
- Better performance: While the antutu score suggest that ZTE has better performance, real world performance can vary and the Oppo comes equipped with better chipset and GPU.
- More features: The Oppo's additional sensors like compass and gravity also contribute to my choice, allowing for more advanced and diverse applications.
Although the ZTE's newer Android OS is a plus, the overall user experience is better with the Oppo due to its superior display and camera quality as well as better performance, making it a more compelling option.