Oppo A54 5G vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 14, 2021 May 13, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 102.22 cm³ 100.96 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.33 "/g
Weight 190 g 204 g
Height 162.9 mm 163.3 mm
Width 74.7 mm 73.6 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Fluid Black
  • Fantastic Purple
  • Space Silver
  • Silver
  • Gold
  • Black

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.8 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1116 x 2480
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.8 % 92.9 %
Pixel Density 405 PPI 400 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness 480 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1500 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 108.13 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.92 mAh/cm³ 49.53 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 619 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.1
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.1, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Here's a detailed comparison of the Oppo A54 5G and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra, focusing on their real-world implications:

Design

FeatureOppo A54 5GZTE Axon 40 UltraPractical Impact
Dimensions162.9 × 74.7 × 8.4 mm163.3 × 73.6 × 8.4 mmZTE is slightly taller and narrower; negligible real-world difference.
Weight190g204gOppo is lighter, potentially more comfortable for extended use.
BuildStandardStandardBoth are standard smartphones, not foldable or ruggedized.

Display

FeatureOppo A54 5GZTE Axon 40 UltraPractical Impact
Size6.5"6.8"ZTE provides a slightly larger viewing area, better for media consumption.
Resolution1080x24001116x2480ZTE offers moderately sharper visuals.
Pixel Density405 PPI400 PPINearly identical sharpness, difference is not noticeable
TechnologyIPS LCDAMOLEDZTE has superior blacks, contrast, and color vibrancy. Significantly better for dark themes and media viewing.
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzZTE provides smoother scrolling and animations.
Brightness0 nits1500 nitsZTE offers significantly better outdoor visibility in bright sunlight.

Performance

FeatureOppo A54 5GZTE Axon 40 UltraPractical Impact
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm)ZTE is significantly faster, smoother for all tasks, including demanding games.
AnTuTu Score216,5041,061,300ZTE is significantly more powerful; smoother multitasking, faster app loading, better gaming performance.
GPUAdreno 619Adreno 730ZTE has much stronger graphical capabilities suitable for gaming.

Camera

FeatureOppo A54 5GZTE Axon 40 UltraPractical Impact
Standard Camera48MP, f/1.7, 1/2", OV48B64MP, f/1.6, 1/1.72", Sony IMX787ZTE offers higher resolution and better low-light performance.
Selfie Camera16MP, f/2.0, 1/3.13", IMX47116MP, f/2.0, Omnivision, 1.22 µmSimilar performance, though the Axon's larger pixel size may help in low light.
Telephoto LensNone64MP, f/3.5, 1/2", OV64BZTE provides zoom capabilities, great for distant subjects.
Wide Angle Lens8MP, f/2.2NoneOppo can capture a wider field of view.
ToF 3D sensorNone0.3MPZTE offers depth sensing for enhanced portrait shots
Macro Lens2MP, f/2.4NoneOppo allows for close up photography.
Wide Angle + MacroNone64MP, f/2.3, 1/1.72", Sony IMX787ZTE provides a high-resolution wide and macro combination.
Black & White2MP, f/2.4NoneOppo provides dedicated monochrome shots.
Video1080p@30fps, EISUp to 8K@30fps, HDR, EISZTE offers much higher quality video recording, including HDR options.

Battery

FeatureOppo A54 5GZTE Axon 40 UltraPractical Impact
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhSimilar battery life expected.
Charging18W Fast, Li-Ion65W Fast, Li-PolymerZTE charges much faster, reduces downtime significantly.
ChargerInbox 10WNot specifiedOppo comes with a charger, which may be more convenient.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo A54 5G Advantages

  • Lighter Weight: At 190g, it's slightly more comfortable to hold for extended periods.
  • Dedicated Wide-Angle and Macro Lens: Offers more versatile photography options, allowing users to capture wide landscapes or close-up details.
  • Slightly Better Pixel Density: Offers slightly sharper visuals though the practical difference is negligible.
  • Lower Price Point: Typically much more affordable than high-end phones like the Axon 40 Ultra, making it a budget-friendly option.
  • Inbox charger: Comes with a charger in the box, offering more convenience.

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Advantages

  • Superior Display: The AMOLED screen with 120Hz refresh rate and high brightness provides a dramatically better viewing experience.
  • Much Faster Performance: The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset offers significantly smoother and faster performance, better for heavy apps and gaming.
  • Advanced Camera System: Higher resolution main sensor, telephoto lens, and superior video capabilities.
  • Much Faster Charging: 65W fast charging significantly reduces charging time.
  • More RAM and Storage Options: Provides more options for power users, with up to 18GB of RAM and 1TB storage.
  • Better Audio Features: Enhanced surround sound, better audio separation, and better voice capture thanks to DTS / DTS X, stereo speakers, and three microphones.

Significant Trade-offs

  • Oppo A54 5G: Sacrifices performance, display quality, and camera capabilities for a lower price point.
  • ZTE Axon 40 Ultra: Significantly more expensive, larger size and heavier build may be less comfortable for some users, lacks a dedicated wide-angle and macro lens.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo A54 5G

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users who prioritize affordability and battery life over performance and advanced features.
  • Use Cases: Everyday tasks, social media, web browsing, basic gaming, casual photography, users who prioritize a lighter phone and need long battery life.
  • Price-to-Value: Offers good value for the price, especially for users on a tight budget.

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra

  • Ideal User: Power users, gamers, and photography enthusiasts who want the best performance and features, and are willing to pay for it.
  • Use Cases: High-end gaming, demanding applications, professional-grade photography, and videography, media consumption.
  • Price-to-Value: Priced as a premium phone; offers top-tier features, thus justifying the high price.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions

  1. Budget: How much are you willing to spend on a phone?
  2. Primary Use Case: What will you use your phone for most often? (gaming, media, photography, basic tasks)
  3. Feature Priority: Do you prioritize performance and display or camera versatility and battery life, or price?

Scenario-Based Recommendations

  • Scenario 1: Budget-Conscious User - If budget is the primary concern and you need a phone for basic tasks, the Oppo A54 5G is the better choice.
  • Scenario 2: Performance Enthusiast - If you want top-tier performance, a stunning display, and a great camera, and budget is not a limiting factor, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is the superior option.
  • Scenario 3: Photography Lover - If you value a versatile camera, and dont mind sacrificing high end performance, the Oppo A54 5G may be better as it offers dedicated wide angle and macro lenses. However, if you need the highest video quality with telephoto zoom, then the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra will be preferable.

My Choice

If I had to choose, I would pick the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra. While the Oppo A54 5G has its merits in being budget-friendly and lightweight, the Axon 40 Ultra provides a vastly superior user experience, especially in display quality and performance. The AMOLED screen with a 120Hz refresh rate is a game-changer for media consumption, and the high-end chipset ensures that the phone can handle demanding tasks without breaking a sweat. Although it is more expensive, the investment is worth it for the improved performance, faster charging, and overall smoother experience. The camera system is also much more capable if that is a concern, but if budget was not a concern, I would be swayed by the screen quality and overall speed.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.