Oppo A54 5G vs Samsung Galaxy M32 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 14, 2021 June 28, 2021
Release Year 2021 2021

Physical

Volume 102.22 cm³ 99.02 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.56 "/g
Weight 190 g 180 g
Height 162.9 mm 159.3 mm
Width 74.7 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Fluid Black
  • Fantastic Purple
  • Space Silver
  • Black
  • Light Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.4 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.8 % 83.9 %
Pixel Density 405 PPI 411 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 480 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 800 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 122.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.92 mAh/cm³ 50.49 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 11
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Oppo A54 5G vs. Samsung Galaxy M32

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureOppo A54 5GSamsung Galaxy M32Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions162.9 x 74.7 x 8.4 mm159.3 x 74 x 8.4 mmOppo is slightly taller, but both are the same width and thickness. The size difference is minor, and both will feel similar in hand.
Weight190g180gSamsung is 10g lighter, which might make it slightly more comfortable to hold for extended periods.
Display
Size6.5"6.4"Minimal difference in screen size, unlikely to be noticeable.
Resolution1080x24001080x2400Identical resolutions provide similar sharpness.
PPI405411Virtually identical pixel densities, resulting in nearly indistinguishable visual clarity.
TechnologyIPS LCDAMOLEDAMOLED offers deeper blacks, higher contrast, and more vibrant colors. Better viewing experience, especially for media consumption. AMOLED is more power-efficient with dark themes.
Refresh Rate90Hz90HzBoth provide smoother scrolling and animations compared to standard 60Hz displays.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBoth phones have unknown peak brightness levels, which makes it impossible to compare outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (8nm)Mediatek Helio G80 (12nm)Snapdragon 480 is newer and more efficient, offering slightly better performance. The 8nm process also implies better battery efficiency under load compared to 12nm.
AnTuTu Score216,504204,000Oppo A54 5G has a 6% higher score, indicating slightly better overall performance in benchmarks.
GPUAdreno 619Mali-G52 MC2Adreno 619 is generally a bit more powerful and provides better gaming performance.
Camera
Main Camera48MP, f/1.7, 1/2", 0.8µm64MP, f/1.8, Unknown, UnknownSamsung has higher resolution for more detailed shots in good light. Oppo has a slightly wider aperture for better low-light performance.
Selfie Camera16MP, f/2.0, 1/3.13", 1.0µm20MP, f/2.2, Unknown, UnknownSamsung has a higher resolution for more detailed selfies. Oppo has a wider aperture for potentially better low-light selfies.
Wide Angle8MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm8MP, f/2.2, UnknownBoth offer similar wide-angle camera performance.
Portrait (Depth)None2MP, f/2.4, UnknownSamsung has a dedicated depth sensor for better portrait mode.
Macro2MP, f/2.4, 1.75µm2MP, f/2.4, UnknownBoth have a 2MP macro camera, likely of similar quality.
Black & White2MP, f/2.4, 1.75µmNoneOppo has a dedicated black and white sensor which will help with monochrome picture quality.
Video1080p@30fps with EIS1080p@30fpsBoth record similar quality video. Oppo offers EIS for better video stabilization.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth have large batteries offering similar battery life for typical use.
Charging18W Fast Charging25W Fast ChargingSamsung charges faster, reducing waiting times.
Inbox Charger10W15WSamsung includes a faster inbox charger
Software
OSAndroid 11Android 11, Upgradeable to 13Samsung will receive longer software support for Android updates.
Connectivity
Wi-FiWi-Fi MiMOWi-FiOppo A54 5G additionally supports Wi-Fi MiMO
Bluetooth5.1 LE5.0Oppo A54 5G has a newer Bluetooth version with aptX support.
GPSQZSSNoneOppo A54 5G supports more satellite systems, better accuracy
Storage
Internal64GB/128GB/256GB64GB/128GBOppo provides options for more storage space if needed.
RAM4GB/8GB4GB/6GB/8GBBoth offer up to 8GB of RAM, providing options for more demanding users.
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone supports external storage via microSD cards.
Sensors
SensorsGravity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Fingerprint, ProximityAccelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Fingerprint, ProximityOppo A54 5G additionally has a Gravity Sensor

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo A54 5G Advantages:

  • Slightly Better Performance: The Snapdragon 480 offers a 6% better benchmark performance than the Helio G80.
  • More Storage Options: Offers a 256GB internal storage configuration compared to the 128GB maximum of the Samsung.
  • Better Bluetooth: Features Bluetooth 5.1 with aptX support.
  • More accurate GPS: Supports QZSS satellite system.
  • Black & White Camera: Additional B&W sensor offers creative photography options.
  • EIS Video Stabilisation: Provides electronic image stabilisation which might be useful for video recordings.
  • More sensors Has Gravity Sensor in addition to all the others.

Samsung Galaxy M32 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED display offers significantly better color and contrast than the IPS LCD.
  • Faster Charging: 25W fast charging is noticeably faster than the 18W charging of the Oppo.
  • Higher Resolution Main Camera: 64MP main camera allows for more detailed photos.
  • Higher Resolution Selfie Camera: 20MP front camera for sharper selfies.
  • Dedicated Depth Sensor: Offers better portrait mode performance.
  • Software Upgrade: Android 13 upgrade available unlike the Oppo phone.

Practical Implications:

  • Display: The AMOLED display is a clear win for the Samsung, making it better for media consumption, gaming, and everyday use, especially in bright environments.
  • Performance: The difference in performance is not that noticeable and both phones will handle most tasks smoothly.
  • Cameras: The Samsung has higher resolution main and selfie cameras, while the Oppo has more features like wider aperture and black & white camera, meaning it's hard to say which one takes better photos.
  • Battery: The Samsung charges faster, which is more convenient.
  • Software: Samsung offers longer software support with its Android 13 upgrade option.
  • Storage: Oppo offers the option for users to purchase higher 256 GB storage, while the maximum storage available in the Samsung phone is 128 GB.

Trade-offs:

  • Oppo A54 5G users gain a little performance and more storage options, but sacrifice the better AMOLED screen and fast charging.
  • Samsung Galaxy M32 users gain a vastly superior screen, faster charging, and longer software support, but lose in performance and storage options.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Ideal User for Oppo A54 5G:

  • Budget-conscious gamers or power users: Who need slightly better performance from their mobile gaming.
  • Users who prioritize storage: Who need a lot of local storage for photos, videos or games.
  • Users who prefer more GPS accuracy Those who may depend on the GPS capabilities of their phones for navigation will see more accuracy from Oppo A54 5G.

Use Cases for Oppo A54 5G:

  • Gaming at medium settings.
  • Storing a lot of media locally.
  • General day-to-day use with a focus on battery life.
  • Outdoor activities where GPS accuracy is paramount.

Ideal User for Samsung Galaxy M32:

  • Media Consumers: Who watch a lot of videos or movies on their phones.
  • Everyday users: Who want a vibrant display and fast charging.
  • Selfie Enthusiasts: Who take a lot of front-facing pictures.
  • Users who want to future-proof their software: With an available android 13 upgrade.

Use Cases for Samsung Galaxy M32:

  • Enjoying high-quality media.
  • Taking detailed photos and selfies.
  • Quick daily charging.
  • Users who want to keep their device up to date with software.

Price-to-Value:

  • The Samsung Galaxy M32 likely offers better value for most users due to the superior display and faster charging.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is display quality to you? (AMOLED vs. IPS LCD)
  2. Do you prioritize performance or media experience? (Snapdragon vs. AMOLED Display)
  3. How much storage do you need? (256GB vs 128 GB max).

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Multimedia Junkie - Choose Samsung Galaxy M32 for its superior AMOLED display, fast charging and quality front facing camera.
  • Scenario 2: Power User/Gamer on a budget - Choose Oppo A54 5G for slightly better performance, extra storage, and better GPS accuracy.
  • Scenario 3: Balanced Usage - Choose Samsung Galaxy M32 for the well-rounded experience with a great display, faster charging, and good overall performance.

My Choice

I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M32.

Here's why:

While the Oppo A54 5G has some advantages, the AMOLED display of the Samsung Galaxy M32 is a game changer for me. The enhanced contrast and vibrancy significantly improve the overall user experience, whether I'm browsing social media, watching videos, or playing games. Faster charging is also a big plus.

The marginal difference in performance between the two phones is not a deal breaker in my use cases, and while the storage difference is considerable, I can make do with 128GB. I also like the fact that the Samsung device will be upgradable to Android 13.

The Samsung Galaxy M32 offers a more refined and enjoyable experience for my daily usage habits.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.