Oppo A54 5G vs Motorola Moto G24 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 14, 2021 February 6, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 102.22 cm³ 97.45 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.42 "/g 3.62 "/g
Weight 190 g 181 g
Height 162.9 mm 163.5 mm
Width 74.7 mm 74.5 mm
Thickness 8.4 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Fluid Black
  • Fantastic Purple
  • Space Silver
  • Matte Charcoal
  • Ice Green
  • Blueberry
  • Pink Lavender

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.56 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.8 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 405 PPI 269 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness 480 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 537 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 116.19 mAh/in²
Battery Density 48.92 mAh/cm³ 51.31 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureOppo A54 5GMotorola Moto G24Practical Impact
Design
Launch Date2021-04-142024-02-06Motorola is newer by ~2 years, potentially offering better software support
Dimensions162.9 × 74.7 × 8.4 mm163.5 × 74.5 × 8 mmMotorola is slightly thinner and a tad taller, minimal real-world difference in handling
Weight190g181gMotorola is slightly lighter, may feel more comfortable for longer use
Display
Size6.5"6.56"Virtually identical screen size; negligible difference in user experience
Resolution1080x2400720x1612Oppo provides much sharper text and images due to higher pixel density
PPI405269Oppo offers visibly crisper display, leading to more enjoyable media consumption
TechnologyIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth provide similar color reproduction and viewing angles
Refresh Rate90Hz90HzBoth offer smoother scrolling and animations
Brightness0 nits500 nitsMotorola offers significantly better outdoor visibility in bright sunlight
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm)Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm)Motorola's chipset offers better benchmark performance, potentially leading to smoother app loading and multitasking
AnTuTu Score216,504266,894Motorola has better benchmark scores, suggesting smoother day-to-day performance
GPUAdreno 619Mali-G52 MC2Different GPUs; Motorola’s may be slightly more capable in gaming scenarios
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth offer similar all-day battery life
Charging18W fast charging (Li-Ion)15W fast charging (Li-Polymer)Oppo charges slightly faster
Inbox charger10WNot specifiedOppo includes a charger, while it's not specified if Motorola includes one
Camera
Standard Camera48MP (f/1.7, 1/2", 0.8µm)50MP (f/1.8, 0.64µm)Motorola has higher resolution, Oppo has slightly better aperture; real-world image quality could be comparable
Selfie Camera16MP (f/2.0, 1/3.13", 1.0µm)8MP (f/2.0, 1.12µm)Oppo takes sharper selfies due to much higher resolution
Wide Angle8MP (f/2.2, 1.12µm)2MP (f/2.4)Oppo’s wide-angle camera should offer significantly higher image quality
Macro Lens2MP (f/2.4, 1.75µm)2MP (f/2.4)Similar Macro Lens capability
Black & White2MP (f/2.4, 1.75µm)Not AvailableOppo has an extra B&W sensor, potentially enhancing monochrome photos
Video1080p@30fps with EIS1080p@30fpsBoth capture standard FHD video with video stabilization
FeaturesQuadruple camera, PDAF, CDAF, Laser AF, continuous autofocus, HDR, Night mode, etcTriple camera, PDAF, HDR, Exposure compensation, RAWOppo offers more advanced focusing options; Motorola has raw image support
Software
OSAndroid 11Android 14Motorola offers a newer Android version, providing improved features and security
Connectivity
Wi-Fi802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectBoth offer similar Wi-Fi capabilities, Oppo additionally supports WiFi Display and MiMO
Bluetooth5.1 LE (A2DP, LE, aptX, LDAC, SBC, AAC)5.0 LE (A2DP, EDR, HID, LE)Oppo has slightly newer Bluetooth with more codecs for better audio quality
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, SUPL, GalileoBoth offer accurate positioning; Oppo supports QZSS, Motorola supports SUPL
SIMDual SIM Dual Standby (Nano SIM)Dual SIM Dual Standby (Nano SIM)Both support Dual SIM functionality
Storage
Internal64/128/256GB128/256GBBoth phones have a 256 GB max storage, Motorola has no 64 GB option
RAM4/8 GB4/8 GBBoth offer similar RAM options
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone supports microSD cards
Audio
QualityBasic audio featuresDolby Atmos, Stereo SpeakersMotorola offers significantly better audio immersion with stereo speakers and Dolby Atmos support
Security
FeaturesSide-mounted fingerprint sensorSide-mounted fingerprint sensorBoth phones offer the same basic fingerprint security
Build Quality
ProtectionUnknownUnknownScreen protection specifics unknown for both
Sensors
SensorsFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, GyroscopeFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, GyroscopeBoth have standard set of sensors for everyday use, Oppo additionally features: Gravity

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo A54 5G Advantages:

  • Sharper Display: Higher resolution and pixel density provide a crisper, more detailed viewing experience.
  • Better Selfie Camera: Higher resolution sensor for sharper self-portraits.
  • Wider Angle Lens: higher resolution and wider aperture provide better quality images.
  • More Camera Features: Includes additional camera features such as laser AF, contrast detection autofocus, and continuous shooting.
  • Slightly Faster Charging: 18W charging compared to 15W on the Motorola.
  • Slightly better Bluetooth: Bluetooth 5.1
  • Additional Sensor: Gravity sensor
  • Inbox Charger: Comes with a 10W charger

Motorola Moto G24 Advantages:

  • Newer OS: Comes with Android 14 out of the box providing better features and security updates
  • Brighter Display: Significantly higher brightness improves outdoor visibility in sunlight.
  • Better Overall Performance: Superior AnTuTu benchmark score means a snappier experience
  • Better Audio: Stereo speakers and Dolby Atmos provide an enhanced audio experience.
  • Raw Image Support: Useful for more advanced photo editing

Trade-offs:

  • Oppo: Older OS, lower screen brightness, potentially less audio immersion.
  • Motorola: Lower screen resolution and less detail on the selfie and wide-angle camera.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo A54 5G Ideal User:

  • Users who prioritize display sharpness: Individuals who consume a lot of text-based content, videos, and photos will appreciate the higher resolution screen.
  • Selfie Enthusiasts: Those who take frequent selfies will benefit from the higher resolution front camera.
  • Users needing better camera focusing options: users who need more advanced focus options will enjoy the features of the Oppo.
  • Users looking for a basic set with a slightly better charging and bluetooth: good option for a basic smartphone that covers the essentials.

  • Use Cases:

    • Reading e-books, articles, and browsing websites.
    • Viewing social media content with detailed images and videos.
    • Taking and sharing high-resolution selfies.
    • Basic mobile gaming and general app usage.

Motorola Moto G24 Ideal User:

  • Users who prioritize outdoor visibility: People who frequently use their phones in bright sunlight.
  • Multimedia Consumers: Those who enjoy watching videos, movies, and listening to music will appreciate the enhanced audio.
  • Users who value Performance: Those that require better app loading and responsiveness.
  • Users who need the latest software: Individuals who need access to the most recent features and security upgrades on android.
  • Users that prefer RAW: Those that value flexibility in photo editing.

  • Use Cases:

    • Navigating outdoors, using maps in daylight.
    • Watching movies and videos with immersive audio.
    • Listening to music through the phone's stereo speakers.
    • Playing games and browsing the web.
    • Basic photo editing.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How often do you use your phone in bright sunlight? (Motorola excels in this area)
  2. Do you prioritize display sharpness or overall performance? (Oppo has a better display, Motorola has a better overall score)
  3. Is audio quality important for media consumption? (Motorola has superior audio with stereo speakers)

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Outdoor Use & Multimedia Consumption Choose the Motorola Moto G24 for its brighter screen and superior audio.
  • Scenario 2: Sharp Display & Selfie Focus Choose the Oppo A54 5G for its crisper display and high-resolution selfie camera.
  • Scenario 3: General Daily Use With Balanced Needs Consider Motorola Moto G24 for slightly superior performance, audio, and a newer operating system.

My Choice

If I were choosing between these two phones, I would pick the Motorola Moto G24. While the Oppo A54 5G has a sharper display and better selfie camera, the Motorola G24 offers a more compelling overall package for my needs. The significantly brighter screen makes it much more practical for outdoor use, and the enhanced audio experience with stereo speakers and Dolby Atmos is a big plus for multimedia consumption. Moreover, the newer Android version means I'll get updated security features and the overall performance is snappier. While I appreciate a crisp display, the benefits of the Motorola's screen brightness, audio, performance, and software outweigh the slightly sharper resolution of the Oppo in my daily usage.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.