Oppo A15 vs Samsung Galaxy A03 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Oppo A15
Oppo A15
Oppo

General

Launch Date October 27, 2020 January 21, 2022
Release Year 2020 2022

Physical

Volume 97.69 cm³ 113.41 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.73 "/g 3.32 "/g
Weight 175 g 196 g
Height 164 mm 164.2 mm
Width 75.4 mm 75.9 mm
Thickness 7.9 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Dynamic Black
  • Mystery Blue
  • Black
  • Red
  • Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.52 " 6.5 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83 % 81.8 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A N/A
Typical Brightness 480 nits N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 99.51 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.3 mAh/cm³ 44.09 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4230 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No No
Chipset Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features microUSB 2.0, OTG microUSB 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 11
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Design

FeatureOppo A15Samsung Galaxy A03Practical Impact
Dimensions164 × 75.4 × 7.9 mm164.2 × 75.9 × 9.1 mmGalaxy A03 is slightly thicker and has larger volume, potentially feeling bulkier in hand.
Weight175g196gOppo A15 is lighter, which may be more comfortable for extended use.
Build Quality (Screen Protection)Corning Gorilla Glass 3UnknownOppo A15's screen is more likely to resist scratches and minor impacts.

Display

FeatureOppo A15Samsung Galaxy A03Practical Impact
Size6.52"6.5"Negligible difference in screen size.
Resolution720x1600720x1600Both have the same level of sharpness, adequate for basic viewing but not ideal for detailed content.
PPI269270Practically identical pixel density, resulting in similar perceived sharpness.
TechnologyIPS LCDPLS LCDIPS typically offers better viewing angles and color reproduction compared to PLS.
Refresh Rate60Hz60HzStandard refresh rate; animations and scrolling will appear similar on both.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsImpossible to make a judgement on brightness.

Performance

FeatureOppo A15Samsung Galaxy A03Practical Impact
ChipsetMediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm)Unisoc T606 (12 nm)Unisoc T606 is more powerful, leading to snappier performance in apps and games.
AnTuTu Score113,000174,932Galaxy A03 will feel noticeably faster and more responsive.
GPUPowerVR GE8320Mali-G57 MP1Galaxy A03 has a better GPU, leading to smoother graphics in games and demanding apps.
RAM2GB/3GB/4GB3GB/4GBGalaxy A03 may handle multitasking slightly better, especially with the 4GB option, assuming similar software optimization.

Camera

FeatureOppo A15Samsung Galaxy A03Practical Impact
Main Camera13MP, f/2.248MP, f/1.8Galaxy A03 captures more detailed photos, especially in good lighting, and performs better in low light due to the wider aperture.
Selfie Camera5MP, f/2.45MP, f/2.2Galaxy A03's selfie camera might perform slightly better in low light.
Macro Lens2MPNoneOppo A15 can take close-up shots of small objects.
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsBoth offer similar video quality for basic use.

Battery

FeatureOppo A15Samsung Galaxy A03Practical Impact
Capacity4230mAh5000mAhGalaxy A03 offers longer battery life, reducing the need for frequent charging.
Charging10W7.5WOppo A15 charges slightly faster, but the larger battery of the A03 means it will still take longer to charge fully.

Storage

FeatureOppo A15Samsung Galaxy A03Practical Impact
Internal32GB/128GB32GB/64GB/128GBBoth phones have the same maximum storage capacity of 128GB. Oppo A15 comes in 128 GB and 32 GB variants while Samsung Galaxy A03 comes in 128 GB, 32 GB and 64 GB variants
Expandable StorageNoNoNo expandable storage available for either device

2. Key Differences Analysis

Oppo A15 Advantages:

  • Lighter Weight: More comfortable for prolonged use.
  • Macro Lens: Offers more camera versatility.
  • Gyroscope and Compass: Enables more advanced motion-based features and navigation.
  • Screen Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass 3 provides better scratch and impact resistance.
  • GPS: Supports more satellite systems for better location accuracy

Practical Implications: The Oppo A15 is better for users who prioritize comfort, camera versatility and durability and navigation.

Samsung Galaxy A03 Advantages:

  • Significantly Faster Performance: Better chipset and GPU for smoother app usage and gaming.
  • Larger Battery: Longer battery life for all-day usage.
  • Higher Resolution Main Camera: Captures more detailed photos.
  • Dolby Atmos: Enhanced audio experience for compatible content.
  • Newer Android Version: Longer software support and access to newer features.

Practical Implications: The Galaxy A03 is better for users who prioritize performance, battery life, and camera quality.

Trade-offs:

  • Oppo A15 trades performance and battery life for a lighter design, a macro lens, and a more comprehensive sensor suite.
  • Samsung Galaxy A03 sacrifices comfort, the macro lens and a comprehensive sensor suite for better performance, battery life, and camera quality.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Oppo A15 Ideal User:

  • Users who primarily use their phone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and browsing.
  • Individuals who value a lighter and more comfortable phone.
  • Users who enjoy taking close-up photos of small objects.
  • Users who require accurate location tracking.

Use Cases:

  • Casual social media browsing.
  • Basic photography of everyday objects.
  • Navigation using GPS in urban environments.

Samsung Galaxy A03 Ideal User:

  • Users who want a smooth and responsive experience for everyday tasks and gaming.
  • Individuals who need all-day battery life.
  • Users who prioritize camera quality for capturing memories.
  • Individuals who enjoy watching videos and listening to music with enhanced audio.

Use Cases:

  • Playing mobile games.
  • Taking photos and videos for social media.
  • Streaming videos and music.
  • Multitasking between apps.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is performance to you? If you need a fast and responsive phone, the Galaxy A03 is the better choice.
  2. How much do you value battery life? The Galaxy A03 offers significantly longer battery life.
  3. Do you need a macro lens or enhanced navigation features? If so, the Oppo A15 is the better option.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Mobile Gamer on a Budget: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A03 for its better gaming performance and longer battery life.
  • Scenario 2: Casual User Prioritizing Comfort: Choose the Oppo A15 for its lighter weight and comfortable design.
  • Scenario 3: Photography Enthusiast on a Budget: The Samsung Galaxy A03 has the superior camera.

Which one would I choose and why?

I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A03. While the Oppo A15 has some advantages like a slightly lighter weight and a macro camera, the Galaxy A03 offers a significantly better overall experience. The performance difference is considerable, making everyday tasks and gaming much smoother. The larger battery is also a major plus, ensuring that the phone lasts through a full day of moderate to heavy use. Although the Oppo A15's screen has Corning Gorilla Glass and GPS supports more satellites, the A03 compensates with superior performance and longer battery life. For my usage patterns, the Galaxy A03 offers a better balance of features and performance.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.